Thread: SWR meter
View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 08, 03:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Stray Dog Stray Dog is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2008
Posts: 30
Default SWR meter


On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, exray wrote:

Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:13:37 -0400
From: exray
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Subject: SWR meter

I've got a cheapo CB swr meter which I thought might be suitable for some HF
QRP work. Problem is that it is very insensitive on the HF freqs. Can't
even get more than about 20% of the scale with 5 watts on 40 meters.


I've used those cheapo CB SWR meters, too, and yes at low HF they are not
so sensitive even with the sensitivity turne as high as it can go.

What is more important is the meter reading on "reflected" compared to
"forward". As long as the reflected is much lower (roughly 1/4 or less)
than forward, you should be OK. Most scales I've seen will have a
calibration such that reflected at about half the scale as forward means
an SWR of about three to one. One of my meters has this point at 2/3 of
full scale. I have always felt satisfied if I can get reflected down to
one tenth, or less, of forward by manipulating the antenna tuner.

If you want to be a purist, then you might also consider locating a more
sensitive meter, say 20-50 microamps DC and using that. Most of those
internal meters are 100-200 microamps DC. Or, make the modification you
describe below.

It uses a stripline for pickup and I'm wondering if maybe I should replace
that with a broadband toroid configuration. Any specific recommendations?
How about adding some gimmick capacitance across the stripline to increase
coupling?


I'm not sure it is worth the work to try this, but I don't have a good
recommendation or preference to emphasize.

TIA,
Bill WX4A