View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Old December 17th 08, 08:02 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.scanner
D. Stussy D. Stussy is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 50
Default Palmdale California To Pass Anti Ham Radio Law

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:28:10 -0800 (PST), policy-ham

wrote:
Palmdale, "Kalifornia" is attempting to outlaw amateur radio. The
city of Palmdale has now passed a draft zoning law that proposes an
enforcement unit that could seize amateur radio equipment and

restrict
antenna height to one inch above a fixed structure's roof.

It also applies to mobile and portable operation using an HT. They

can
even arrest you and take your HT just for walking down the street

and
talking on it.

I am not kidding. Here is a link to the actual proposed ordinance
where you can read it for yourself.
http://www.cityofpalmdale.org/city_h...spl120479c.pdf


Cities, or even States, can NOT regulate or restrict, ham radio.


Agreed. However, Palmdale is shooting itself in the "foot."

For those not aware, Palmdale is adjacent to the San Andreas Fault. I
can easily envision any and all amateur operators in the area REFUSING
to take part in any emergency communication, whether practice or real,
with regard to any disaster in the area. Palmdale obviously does not
value the operators as a resource.

Note that Palmdale also went after TV and satellite antennas. Again,
there are laws separate from PRB-1 and its state equivalent that exist
at both the federal and state levels of government that clearly PERMIT
these antennas. Practically EVERYTHING cited in the proposed statute
is pre-empted at a higher government level. Is the City really that
clueless?