Jeff Liebermann wrote:

I must say at the outset that I am hesitant to buy an antenna based on its
form-factor, but I'm forced by the local code to not display bare-element
type antennae on the mast.

As others have mentioned, this is mostly incorrect. The problem is in
the interpretation of the word "unreasonable", which might be
interpreted in a variety of ways. Without details on your situation,
I can't comment on this.

The FCC website has quite a bit of info on interpretation (from various
regulatory and legal actions) of what is and isn't unreasonable. Paint
color: reasonable, restrictions on location: unreasonable, restrictions
on form of antenna: unreasonable.




I do like the panel style for the reason that I can arrange 3 around a common
mast, aimed at remote cities, and join the outputs for increased coverage.

Mast? Welcome to "unreasonable". The FCC 47.1.4000 clause that
limits antenna installation has nothing to say about the supporting
structure. While the HOA may not be able to prevent you from
installing an antenna, they most certainly will have something to say
about the design and construction of the supporting structure. They
may also demand that it be installed by a licensed and insured
installer to protect themselves against subsequent litigation. I know
you don't want to hear about all this, but methinks you should at
least be warned before blundering onward.


Hah.. go look at the case of Stanley and Vera Holliday.. 5 masts 30 ft
high, multiple dishes and antenans...

http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Ord...9/da992132.txt

an analysis at
http://dirt.umkc.edu//dd99/DD991025.htm