View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old September 12th 09, 12:32 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Richard Fry Richard Fry is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 440
Default Art's "Tipping" Belief Explained?

On Sep 11, 9:14*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

You are proposing that a resonant full wave dipole does not
change its characteristics even if it falls over.


1. A full-wave dipole is not self-resonant. Its center-fed impedance
in free space is about 2,000 -j600 ohms.

2. None of the equations for the free-space radiation pattern of a
full-wave, or any length dipole include terms for its physical
orientation.

3. In free space there IS no up, no down and no tilt.

If you are going to suggest something new it must correlate
with existing laws of physics.


Should you not follow your own advice? You are the one suggesting
"something new," and you offer it with only your opinions to support
it. No scientific proof, whatsoever.

Nothing that I have stated with respect to radiation does not
violate any existing laws of physics...


And with that statement I totally agree.

RF