"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...
amdx wrote:

So Richard, you seem to make vailed reports that something may be wrong
with someones ideas.
Why don't you make your own corrections with support and entirely address
all your ideas.
I figured with all the noise you put on the groups I would be able to
find a webpage showing all
the research you have done on antennas, amplifiers and receivers. I
didn't find your webpage, could
you post it so we can learn from all your properly supported research.


Hoo boy, Mike, what you are asking for is a whole lot of research, not
done by Richard, but done by some of the folks whose shoulders we stand
on. Those are topics we all have access to.

This isn't a courtroom where people are asked the color of the sky, then
asked if they have the meteorlogical or art degree at the pHD level, lest
their answer be discarded. Get Terman, Get Kraus. Get Balanis, Get Best,
If those are too rich for your blood,ARRL has some good antenna books,
which are are more practical. Mike

- 73 de Mike N3LI -

My point is Richard constantly complains about others work, but I don't
see he has done any. I specifically was talking about anything he questions,
he
should support his rebuke and entirely address all aspects of the article.
He might know his ****, but all he does is complain, without support.
Mike
He