On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:39:22 +0000, Phil Hobbs
wrote:

Tom Bruhns wrote:

So the right way to do this is to lower the _effective_ minimum
capacitance. You can do that by adding an inductor, to cancel out
capacitance. You can end up making the tuning range as wide as you
want, but at the expense of the crystal (ceramic resonator in your
case) being less of the overall frequency determination. In other
words, there comes a point where you'd be as well off to just do an LC
oscillator. But to double, say, the range, it's a good way to go.

I guess I re-discovered what was already well known, but a few years
ago I designed such a VCXO, and was amazed how linear the
freq-vs-controlvoltage curve was (a good thing for use in a PLL).
Don't know what range you're trying to achieve, but I had no trouble
getting a bit more than 0.1% (~20kHz at 14MHz) that way, with a
crystal.

An inductor in series with the varactors, then another one in parallel
with the series combo can get you a very wide range of impedance from a
decent varactor.

Thanks, is this the kind of thing you mean?



+-------+
| |
| |
| |
C| |
L1 C| |
C| |
| |
| |
V |
D1 - |
| C|
Applied DC control voltage | C| L2
Line --------------------+ C|
| |
| |
D2 - |
^ |
| |
| |
| |
+-------+

View in FP font.

created by Andy´s ASCII-Circuit v1.24.140803 Beta www.tech-chat.de

--

"I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it."
- Winston Churchill