In article , Winfield Hill
writes
Phil Hobbs wrote...

Tom Bruhns wrote:

So the right way to do this is to lower the _effective_ minimum
capacitance. You can do that by adding an inductor, to cancel out
capacitance. You can end up making the tuning range as wide as you
want, but at the expense of the crystal (ceramic resonator in your
case) being less of the overall frequency determination. In other
words, there comes a point where you'd be as well off to just do an
LC oscillator. But to double, say, the range, it's a good way to go.

I guess I re-discovered what was already well known, but a few years
ago I designed such a VCXO, and was amazed how linear the
freq-vs-controlvoltage curve was (a good thing for use in a PLL).
Don't know what range you're trying to achieve, but I had no trouble
getting a bit more than 0.1% (~20kHz at 14MHz) that way, with a
crystal.

An inductor in series with the varactors, then another one in parallel
with the series combo can get you a very wide range of impedance from
a decent varactor.

Sounds good. How about a specific example?

Thanks,
- Win

whill_at_picovolt-dot-com

Thats the way its done to pull crystals a long way.
The thought/real experiment to assist is to assume that the acoustic
resonator is resistive (zero phase) at series resonance.
The maintaining circuit can then be replaced by an equivalent resistor.
The circuit with resistor should oscillate at approx the resonator
frequency.The inductor across the varicap is selected to almost tune
out/parallel resonate with the varicap.
The series inductor is phase retard to ensure the maintaining circuit
tis zero phase . Adjustment of the varicap then moves the circuit above
and below the series resonance of the resonator.




--
ddwyer