View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 24th 10, 11:57 AM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
Brian Morrison[_2_] Brian Morrison[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2010
Posts: 17
Default Codec2 - putting your money where your mouth is

On 24 Sep 2010 09:42:02 GMT
Rob wrote:

Brian Morrison wrote:
With D-STAR unless you buy the pre-programmed DSP chips or the DV
dongle you can't legally reimplement the AMBE codec at all, and that
makes it very different from other kit that implements unpatented
modes.


The problem is that amateurs cannot live with the fact that someone
implemented a codec that is better than what they can develop
themselves.


Really? I thought that what those of us that can't live with it thought
is that we don't like technology that locks out homebrew. That's what
the use of DVSI's AMBE codec does.

I don't know exactly why JARL chose AMBE other than because it was the
only codec available at the time. If so, they should have thought about
that a lot harder and perhaps decided to sponsor the development of a
free codec instead. That would have been really good, but I suppose I
can see that it would have introduced a delay. D-STAR has other faults,
one being that it appears not to be extensible so that there is no way
to include other codecs and allow the correct one to be used according
to the other user's set up.


There would be no problem when amateurs could actually develop a
better codec than AMBE. But they have not shown they can.


Well we'll see won't we? It's taken a while to find people with the
necessary expertise but Codec2 is now moving forward with people
working on it that have that expertise.


Everyone can put up a site with a statement that they want to develop
something and need donations. But this development needs more than
donations.


Yes, it needs talent and for that you need exposure to collect them
together. That's happening now.


Sometimes is it better to just admit that someone did a better job
than you could have done yourself, and just pay him for the work.


I have no problem with that, remember that the "free" part of free
software is referring to freedom, not money. But if someone refuses to
provide something that I can look inside and understand then I won't
use it.

It's called a choice.

--

Brian Morrison