On 4/21/2011 9:11 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

...
Funny how conservatives latch on to jury
verdicts as being definative proof of guilt-
but disregard them entirely when the jury
votes to acquit.

Why is that, do you think?

Where else does evidence coalesce and create a picture of such
definition? Where else do witnesses assemble under one roof, with
evidence about some event? Unless, of course, you have been an eyewitness.

My gawd man, do you attempt to paint yourself a moron with the first
question?

Regards,
JS