On 7/12/2011 9:09 PM, harry k wrote:
On Jul 12, 5:22 pm, John wrote:
On 7/10/2011 8:07 PM, John Smith wrote:



http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=319337

"Now that so many highly qualified graphics experts – seven by my count
– have weighed in unequivocally in pronouncing Barack Obama's "long-form
birth certificate" as an outright fraud, it's time to issue a challenge
to other highly qualified experts to explain why they're wrong.

Isn't it curious that not a single media outlet has quoted even one such
expert to proclaim the document valid?"

Regards,
JS

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=320133

"
In an allegation that pushes the dispute over Barack Obama's
presidential eligibility to a new level, an affidavit prepared to
accompany a criminal complaint over the "Certificate of Live Birth"
released April 27 suggests there was a plan to mislead the American
public, and it went as high as the Oval Office."

Regards,
JS

Look up the meaning of "allegation".

Harry K

Why of course it is going to be an allegation, right up to the time we
have had the trial and throw the dirty b*st*rd in prison, where he belongs!

Regards,
JS