On Jul 12, 11:29*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 7/12/2011 9:09 PM, harry k wrote:





On Jul 12, 5:22 pm, John *wrote:
On 7/10/2011 8:07 PM, John Smith wrote:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=319337

"Now that so many highly qualified graphics experts – seven by my count
– have weighed in unequivocally in pronouncing Barack Obama's "long-form
birth certificate" as an outright fraud, it's time to issue a challenge
to other highly qualified experts to explain why they're wrong.

Isn't it curious that not a single media outlet has quoted even one such
expert to proclaim the document valid?"

Regards,
JS

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=320133

"
In an allegation that pushes the dispute over Barack Obama's
presidential eligibility to a new level, an affidavit prepared to
accompany a criminal complaint over the "Certificate of Live Birth"
released April 27 suggests there was a plan to mislead the American
public, and it went as high as the Oval Office."

Regards,
JS

Look up the meaning of "allegation".

Harry K

Why of course it is going to be an allegation, right up to the time we
have had the trial and throw the dirty b*st*rd in prison, where he belongs!

Regards,
JS- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That trial will be held at approximately the same time the one on his
COLB was...i.e., neveer as the courts will reject it also.
Fortunately the courts seem to be benched with people with working
brains.

Harry K