Extension of PSK segment
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			On Mar 18, 10:03?am, Steve Bonine  wrote: 
 
 Because amateur radio is supposed to be self regulating. 
 
Where is that written in the rules? I can't find it anywhere. 
 
 Perhaps my impression is wrong, in which case I hope that someone will 
 correct me, but don't most countries treat the regulation of amateur 
 radio more like "here are your allocations"? 
 
Many countries outside the US do not have the specific 
subbands-by-mode that the USA does. What they do 
instead is to define the bands available to amateurs 
and the modes their amateurs are allowed on each 
of those bands. Where in a band that 
amateurs choose to use a particular mode in a 
particular band is left up to gentleman's agreements. 
 
Before applying this idea to US amateur radio, however, 
remember these points: 
 
1) The US regulations in terms of subbands-by-mode are 
not much more complex than those of any other country. 
Above 30 MHz, most of the US amateur bands do not have subbands-by- 
mode at all. Same for 160 meters. The bands below 30 MHz (except 30 
meters) are divided into two 
parts, with the lower part devoted to data modes and the upper part 
devoted to voice and image. CW (Morse Code) 
is allowed almost everywhere but is very rarely found in the 
voice/image subbands. 30 meters does not have a voice/image subband 
because it is only 50 kHz wide. 
 
2) The number of amateurs in the USA who are authorized 
to operate non-QRP HF/MF transmitters is much 
greater than the number in any other country - or continent. 
 
3) If the USA were to eliminate subbands-by-mode 
completely, the real-world effect would be to allow 
data modes all over the band instead of just the lower 
end, and voice modes all over the band instead of just 
the upper end. 
 
 I would like to think that there are enough gentlemen in ham radio that 
 gentlemen's agreements and voluntary bandplans would be sufficient. 
 
So would I. But the reality may be somewhat different. 
 
 Based on what I hear on the air, that's a rather silly hope. 
 
I think it depends where you listen. 
 
 Nonetheless, it reflects badly on our hobby that an agency needs to 
 stand by with a big stick to make us do what we should be able to do on 
 our own. 
 
Part of the problem is lack of enforcement by FCC of 
other rules of the ARS for a considerable number of 
years. This situation has improved in recent years, but 
it's not perfect by any means. 
 
It should also be remembered that the requirements for 
an amateur license, and the enforcement of rules, is 
usually quite different in other countries. (Compare 
the written-test requirements in the UK and US, for 
example). There are also considerable cultural 
differences. 
 
73 de Jim, N2EY 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |