On Jul 22, 11:56*am, "Chas.Chan" wrote:
Tea Party Targeted by 'All the Bolsheviks' Children' (ABC)
By Selwyn Duke

It wasn't just that ABC's Brian Ross was wrong in suggesting that the
"Jim Holmes" he found on a Tea Party website was the same man who
committed the heinous crime in Aurora, Colorado. *It's that it was
indicative of stupidity and corruption.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...ross_apologize...

If Ross had thought for a moment and possessed a grasp of reality, he
would've realized that "Jim Holmes" is a common name belonging to
hundreds of men throughout the nation. If he had some integrity and a
desire to be even-handed, he would have vetted the information more
before airing it -- just as he would have if at issue had been an
alleged left-wing association.

Just imagine if someone appeared on TV shortly after the Aurora
tragedy and stated, not just to provide biographical info but with an
ominous implication, "We now know that Holmes attended UC
Riverside...." Now, I'll be the first to say that modern academia does
teach insanity; nonetheless, since this school isn't known to
orchestrate terrorist acts, it wouldn't leap to mind to implicate it
in Holmes's atrocity. *The fact is that any given person will have had
a number of associations in his life, and few, if any, will bear
relevance to a crime he may commit.

So there can be only two reasons why ABC would mention a possible
Holmes/Tea Party (TP) association: either its people want to demonize
conservatives every chance they get, or they think traditionalist
thought constitutes a pathology. It turns out that Effluent Stream
Media leftists are deeply involved in doing the former and generally
believe the latter.

Now, you see, my last line contains what is called a correct profile.
Because it happens to be true. On the other hand, if leftists were
intellectually honest, they'd accept that the TP has been remarkably
civilized. Unlike Only Whining Socialists (OWS), its events aren't
marked by sexual abuse, the occasional rape, violence, vandalism and
slovenly, anti-social behavior. Rather, TP attendees protest
peacefully, abide by the law, listen to speeches and then go home,
leaving the site behind them clean and tidy. *It's the difference
between sane citizens and those who mistake police cars for toilet
bowls.

In fact, ABC hewed so closely to the leftist profile it's uncanny.
Liberals have been trying for ages to get the goods on the TP, but the
most their sleuthing has uncovered is an allegation that a black
politician was targeted by one or two TP attendees with a racial
epithet that, curiously, wasn't caught on audio or video despite
today's ubiquity of electronic devices. And it must be frustrating.
That darn reality just refuses to conform to leftist prejudices.

And sometimes prejudices persecute those who promote them. Ross might
have learned this through his corrupted act, if liberals were
receptive to reality and could learn anything contrary to their
deified feelings. *Note that "corrupted" isn't quite the same as
"corrupt," even though many leftists are both. When we say a computer
file is corrupted, all that's being recognized is that it's degraded
and cannot function properly. And to whatever extent liberals are
willfully corrupt, they are certainly corrupted. *They cannot, and do
not, function properly.

This is, by the way, why ex-newsman Dan Rather's career was scuttled
(far too late) through an act that was somewhat reminiscent of
Ross's. *When Rather peddled documents purporting to show that George
W. Bush shirked his military duties, he didn't know they were forged.
They did, however, align with his prejudices. "Why, that's exactly how
these conservatives are! This has to be true; it makes sense." But
only when you're senseless. Just as with Ross, if a leftist person or
entity stood to be impugned through the reportage, Rather would have
moved mountains to discover if the documents were authentic; that is,
if he would have considered doing the story at all. *Instead, after a
career running with the bulls, he finally suffered a trampling of his
own design.

http://archive.mrc.org/campaign/04/rather.asp

So I'll be blunt. As is often the case, when leftists accuse
conservatives of failings, it is projection. Traditionalist thought is
not a pathology.

Liberal unthought is a pathology.

And a severe one that destroys everything it touches.

As Peter Schweizer reported in his piece "Don't listen to the liberals-
Right-wingers really are nicer people, latest research shows," studies
have borne out what I've always known: Liberals are cheap, ungenerous,
uncharitable, unloving, self-centered, envious, greedy and covetous.
They're less likely than conservatives to devote time to ailing or
needy loved ones, and they even hug their children less. And this
reflects one reason why they support big government: they assuage
their consciences by outsourcing their charity. I'll add to this that
they're lustful, prideful, wrathful, often slothful and, if Michael
Moore is any indication, gluttonous as well. In a word, they are the
Seven Deadly Sins incarnate.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...sten-liberals-...

As for ABC, since news obviously isn't its bag, I have a programming
suggestion. It could replace a certain long-running but recently
cancelled soap opera it's famous for with something that can be called
"All the Bolsheviks' Children." This could break new ground and help
rebuild ABC's reputation for honesty, as it would be the most self-
revelatory reality show in history.

just read somewhere that ABC's staff all got together in a small room
after the bogus report by Ross and had a group jerk off! The Loon
Stooges at MSNBC were SO ****ed that they weren't invited.