On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:47:30 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:57:34 -0400, Active8
wrote:

I *do* remember reading *that*. 0 + 2.48 = 0 for sufficiently small
values of 2.48, yup.

Now *that's* funny!

Too bad Paul won't see it!

John

Based on some recent posts, I suspect that duplicitous white trash
POS is reading my posts despite his blasting JT for "not sticking to
his [ctrl-k] guns" just to see what I'm saying behind his back. It's
not really backstabbing since it's out in the open and I'd say it to
his face before I rearrange it like so much algebra.

I think he needs a good old fashioned hillbilly ass-whoopin' what
with the way he's flaming a few of us and making hillbilly slurs.

Apologies again for the multiple replies to self while working this
out. That Siliconix book used design curves and iterative stuff.

I'd be impressed if SFB Burridge (rhymes with porridge - like the
space between his audio sensors) could solve the bias net (or any
net) on his own.
--
Best Regards,
Mike