The legal saga nears it's end
On Monday, July 29, 2013 6:56:25 PM UTC-5, Phil Kane wrote:
My educated opinion - if he remains on the air the FCC will have all
it needs to go to the US Justice Department for seizure and arrest
warrants on violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act. It's
been done before. Maybe it could be a Homeland Security thing! G
As it stands, we are waiting for the ALJ to simply "stay" the hearing on Ba
xter's renewal. If the ALJ agrees to do that, the renewal will then be subj
ect to the "red light" rule and rejected because Baxter owes the FCC the co
urt ordered $10,000. When the renewal is denied, Baxter's authority to oper
ate will immediately expire.
I have no clue if there is any precedent for the ALJ to grant the stay requ
ested by the enforcement lawyers, or if he even has the authority to stay a
hearing like that. It's been a couple of months since the request was mad
e but I've seen nothing about this posted yet. Does anybody know how to loo
k at the ALJ's schedule?
-= bob =-
AKA
KC4UAI
|