View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old December 20th 03, 06:06 PM
Gene Fuller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil,

If it is the "ultimate reference" there is no need for multiple points of view.
Everything contained in the ultimate reference will be complete, correct, and
indisputable.

Sorta like RRAA.

73,
Gene
W4SZ


Cecil Moore wrote:
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:

I like the statement on the cover of ARRL Antenna Book: "The ULTIMATE
reference
for Amateur Radio antennas, transmission lines and propagation"



But Yuri, shouldn't an "ULTIMATE reference" contain both sides
of the issue? :-)