View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 9th 05, 04:30 PM
Brian Reay
 
Posts: n/a
Default




"mexico_zero" wrote in message
...

"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message .....

is that we club together and conceive of a design snip


We wouldn't need any facilities other than were present in,
say, the KW2000 of 35 years ago snip


None of the CBer's facilities such as scanners, memories,
CAT interfaces, CTCSS and the like are necessary snip


I suggest that we consider a DSP approach for all the
baseband mod and demod, and then phasing techniques
for translating into the various bands.snip


Adress the contradictions and I may consider this as a sensible
suggestion....



Indeed, not a bad idea at all.

However, what is to be gained by re-inventing a (in radio terms) stone age
design?

Thinks like computer control provide added challenge and attraction to the
idea, why dismiss them? They could always be add-ons. DSP. Oh dear. I
assume this phasing technique relies on Big K.


Or maybe he just meant mixing, an existing technique not needing DSP.

--
Brian Reay
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk
FP#898