"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote ...

Fred Maia, W5YI, was quoted as saying something along that line WRT the
Tech test ... but Fred is just *one* of the Directors of NCI, and I can
state that his view in that regard is NOT NCI policy and is not shared by me
or the rest of the NCI board. (IIRC, Fred also said he'd like to make the
Extra test more rigorous ...)

[Of course, NCI was never in favor of removing the digital/CW sub bands
either, right?]

No, we were not ... and we never said we were. If you "google" or whatever,
you will, I am sure, find numerous instances of me saying that I would *not*
favor an expansion of the phone bands at the expense of the digital/CW
sub-bands, because I wouldn't want to see the future development of digital
modes impeded. (the rest snipped)
__________________________________________________ _______________________

That could be what I was thinking of. Quoted by ya'll referring to Fred.
But I distinctly remember there being a discussion about lowering the
technical test requirements and that NCI was in favor of that.

Now, as to Digital/CW sub-bands. Below is the official comment by NCI -- it
sure sounds like they would roll over and play dead if it should ever come
to supporting the keeping of sub-bands for Digital/CW. Do you read it
differently, Carl?
__________________________________________________ ________________________

"d. Third, Mr. Kane recommends that there be no regulatory distinction made
between modes of transmission. This point would likely gain mixed, but
significant support amongst NCI's membership, and it should be pointed out
that this is the norm in the rest of the world and no real harm seems to
have come from the lack of restrictive sub-band-by-mode limitations such as
those currently embodied in the Commission's Rules."

From NCIs Reply comments to the NPRM


Arnie -
KT4ST