View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old July 15th 03, 05:45 AM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kim W5TIT wrote:

"K0HB" wrote in message
. com...


I was under the impression (apparently mistaken?) that a licensed
amateur could possess any sort of equipment (commercial, homebrew,
converted surplus) or whatever. I know of no rule against MODIFICATION
of equipment, even if that modification permits operation outside the
amateur bands. The rules properly speak to signal purity, staying
inside the assigned bands, etc., etc., but do NOT seem to prohibit
modifications of factory-built equipment. (In fact, I could probably
make an argument that the FCC rules ENCOURAGE tinkering and
experimentation of this sort!)

However I note the FCC has required at least one licensed ham, Michael
V. Swift, KG6QOB, to restore a rig to "original manufacturer's
specifications".

("You are directed to have the transceiver returned to the original
manufacturer's specifications by reinstalling the jumper wire which
the cutting or removal of permits operation outside the amateur bands.
The jumper wire must be repaired or installed, and encapsulated with
epoxy or similar material to preclude future modification. After the
repair is completed you are directed to bring the transceiver to this
office so that the repair can be confirmed and related technical
measurements can be made.

You have until July 7, 2003 to respond to this inquiry and to provide
the repaired transceiver for inspection.")

While I understand the reason for the action (malicious interference
and false distress signals on marine frequencies), it strikes me that
this particular remedy is not supported by the law, and might set a
precedent for de facto "type acceptance" in the Amateur Radio service.

What say, ye lawyerly types?

73, de Hans, K0HB



I am not a lawyerly type (dang that's hard to even spell let alone sound
out), but:

It is my understanding that even amateur operators must have equipment that
is "Type Accepted" by the FCC. Now, not all that sure what that means, as
when one buys new equipment it isn't a concern. BUT, I do know that I've
heard discussions on the air whereby it is said to be illegal to own
"illegal" radios (those CBs that can transmit outside the legal limits of CB
radio) and "foot warmers" (those that have been modified to be able to work
outside the ham bands...like, one that was originally for 10M that now works
well in the CB range, etc.).

Kim W5TIT




As I understamd it, hams may modify for their own use radio equipment
and use it
on any ham band their license is good for. Even modify a CB radio to
work in
the ten meter band. Or modify a linear to operate in ten meters. But
no more
than 5 copies of any particular model in a year. That modified CB could
operate
outside of a ham band, but it's up to us to not do that. Supposidly we know
enough (having passed written exams when applying for a ham license) to know
what frequency and mode we are on and using, and where such are permitted
for hams to use. Thus the FCC lets us use non type accepted (or
whatever they
call it nowadays) or modified radios. CBers, fire and police depts,
marine users,
cell phones, FRS and such users didn't take any exams on radio before being
allowed to use these type accepted radios.

Also heard that the big manufacturers who make more than 5 copies of the
same
model need type acceptance from the FCC.