Kim W5TIT wrote: 
 
"K0HB"  wrote in message 
.  com... 
 
 
I was under the impression (apparently mistaken?) that a licensed 
amateur could possess any sort of equipment (commercial, homebrew, 
converted surplus) or whatever. I know of no rule against MODIFICATION 
of equipment, even if that modification permits operation outside the 
amateur bands. The rules properly speak to signal purity, staying 
inside the assigned bands, etc., etc., but do NOT seem to prohibit 
modifications of factory-built equipment. (In fact, I could probably 
make an argument that the FCC rules ENCOURAGE tinkering and 
experimentation of this sort!) 
 
However I note the FCC has required at least one licensed ham, Michael 
V. Swift, KG6QOB, to restore a rig to "original manufacturer's 
specifications". 
 
("You are directed to have the transceiver returned to the original 
manufacturer's specifications by reinstalling the jumper wire which 
the cutting or removal of permits operation outside the amateur bands. 
The jumper wire must be repaired or installed, and encapsulated with 
epoxy or similar material to preclude future modification. After the 
repair is completed you are directed to bring the transceiver to this 
office so that the repair can be confirmed and related technical 
measurements can be made. 
 
You have until July 7, 2003 to respond to this inquiry and to provide 
the repaired transceiver for inspection.") 
 
While I understand the reason for the action (malicious interference 
and false distress signals on marine frequencies), it strikes me that 
this particular remedy is not supported by the law, and might set a 
precedent for de facto "type acceptance" in the Amateur Radio service. 
 
What say, ye lawyerly types? 
 
73, de Hans, K0HB 
 
 
 
I am not a lawyerly type (dang that's hard to even spell let alone sound 
out), but: 
 
It is my understanding that even amateur operators must have equipment that 
is "Type Accepted" by the FCC.  Now, not all that sure what that means, as 
when one buys new equipment it isn't a concern.  BUT, I do know that I've 
heard discussions on the air whereby it is said to be illegal to own 
"illegal" radios (those CBs that can transmit outside the legal limits of CB 
radio) and "foot warmers" (those that have been modified to be able to work 
outside the ham bands...like, one that was originally for 10M that now works 
well in the CB range, etc.). 
 
Kim W5TIT 
 
 
 
 
As I understamd it, hams may modify for their own use radio equipment 
and use it 
on any ham band their license is good for.  Even modify a CB radio to 
work in 
the ten meter band.  Or modify a linear to operate in ten meters.  But 
no more 
than 5 copies of any particular model in a year.  That modified CB could 
operate 
outside of a ham band, but it's up to us to not do that.  Supposidly we know 
enough (having passed written exams when applying for a ham license) to know 
what frequency and mode we are on and using, and where such are permitted 
for hams to use.  Thus the FCC lets us use non type accepted (or 
whatever they 
call it nowadays) or modified radios.  CBers, fire and police depts, 
marine users, 
cell phones, FRS and such users didn't take any exams on radio before being 
allowed to use these type accepted radios. 
 
Also heard that the big manufacturers who make more than 5 copies of the 
same 
model need type acceptance from the FCC. 
 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |