Carl R. Stevenson wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...

Carl R. Stevenson wrote:

While the intent may be good, this is a REALLY BAD idea ...

Flooding the FCC Commissioner's e-mail inboxes with such letters
will only **** them off ... at ALL of ham radio, not just
pro-code-test or no-code test factions.

There is a right way and a wrong way to do this ... and this is
DEFINITELY the WRONG way.

Those who support the elimination of the Morse test from US FCC
rules would be well-advised to join NCI http://www.nocode.org and
follow the news.

NCI's Board of Directors is working the strategy for how to best
approach the FCC on this matter and we will keep the membership
informed when we have finalized those discussions.

Ya gotta get your people under control, Carl! 8^)


I'm not sure who you're referring to when you say "my people" ... the
ownership of people was abolished many, many years ago.

Not a very good deflection try.

Your people are the people on your side of this argument, quite simply.

These are the people I made a note of some time ago when I wrote to
youand some others about what comes next for the ARS.

These are the people that while they may not share all your views,
arereally excited about what you have played a large part in bringing
tofruition. It's like a 50 percent discount, and they want it bad. Many
would like evn more. And whether you like or not, you have given
themgreat encouragement through your efforts.

Nothing stands still. Where does the ARS go from here? I see lots
ofpostings from people who want to do bizzare, illogical, and plain
wronginterpretation of rules, I see calls for elinimation of the
subbands,lots of good stuff.


So yes, they are very much "your" people, Carl. And unless you get them
under control, they may do grave damage to the ARS.

Do you think that they are going to pay one bit of attention to people
like us PCTA's? It's up to you as a leader to get them under control.
Good luck.


I am simply trying to provide good advice to folks who might be
overly eager and get carried away in ways that would be bad for ALL
of ham radio.

Good idea, I agree 100 percent.

- Mike KB3EIA -