"Bob Brock" wrote in message
...
On 5 Sep 2003 05:30:04 GMT, "Dick Carroll;" wrote:



"S. Hanrahan" wrote:

On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:00:13 -0400, Bob Brock
wrote:

Why would you want to foil computer copy?

Because no law says you can't.

For you to do the test to
make sure that it works and then advocate it's use, you can't really
say that wasn't your intention.

What if it was? Nothing you can do about it but learn the code.

The guy is a lost cause. He doesn't even understrand that no testing ever
need be done.
All it takes is a bit of understanding, which he clearlyh lacks.

You sound like a religous fanatic. Is that your intention or is it
natural? Am I now condemned to no-code hell for eternity? I'm sorry,
but if I could take your chidish commets seriously, I might actually
take a serious look at your position. However, from what I see right
now, you don't have a valid position to look at.


Well, you understand Dick quite perfectly... ; )

Kim W5TIT