View Single Post
  #78   Report Post  
Old September 15th 03, 02:19 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , ospam
(Larry Roll K3LT) writes:

In article ,

(N2EY)
writes:

With all due respect, Larry - were you there?


Jim:

Obviously not. Point?


That the same complaints you have about today's tests can be made by some of
those who came before you.

Did you have to take a sending test?


No, but I could have easily passed one.


"could have" and "did" are not the same thing.

Did you have to pass all of the elements to upgrade at the same time?


No. You got me there.

Did you have to wait 2 years to even try the Extra?


No. Ditto.

See?

Challenging licensing requirements and
uncompromising testing procedures.


They've been "compromising" forever. Back before WW2 the exam was all blue

book essays. Before 1960 there was diagram drawing. The tests I took in
1967-70 were "dumbed down" compared to those because my tests were all
multiple choice.


Yeah, I know, and that's my point. However, the level of "dumbing-down"
that has occurred just in the last few years is way out of porportion to that
which took place from the beginning of FCC testing and the time you and I
became licensed.


Those who had to do essays and draw diagrams might disagree.

Of course, all that is waaaaay too
PoliticKally IncorrecKt today, since someone with a particular ethnic
origin, skin color, religion, "gender," or a hangnail might not be able
to pass the first time or two. This certainly won't do in these
enlightened times.


None of that had anything to do with the license test changes.


Oh, really? Prove it.


Just look at the records and the old regs. Nothing in there about ethnicity,
skin color, religion or gender. I dunno about hangnails.

Incentive Licensing came about in LBJ's time

Dick Bash did his stuff (and got away with it) when Nixon and Ford were in
office


The change to the VE system happened under Reagan

We got medical waivers because a "king" wanted a favor from George Bush 1.

We also got a nocodeham license because of GB 1.

Etc.


Damn those Republicans! OBTW -- who was President when the
"Restructuring" took place?


That would be Slick Willy Clinton.

After all, it might "exclude" someone who is, in
reality, a nascent technical genius who just needs the ability to talk
on the HF phone bands in order to find the inspiration to create the
next fabulous new invention which will revolutionize electronic
communication for the rest of all time!

Or something like that.

Don't hold yer breath waiting for it, tho.


Trust me, I'm not.

Me neither.

So, have you commented on each of the 7 petitions now before FCC?

73 de Jim, N2EY