View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 10th 03, 08:50 PM
Carl R. Stevenson
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Hans K0HB" wrote in message
om...
"Bill Sohl" wrote


Mega Dittos. I especially like the "catch 22"
prohibition of new modes. Frankly I'm surprised
that Joe didn't think of that.


I sent a courtesy copy of my comments to the author of RM-10808. Here
is his response.

73, de Hans, K0HB
__________________________________________________ ______

RESPONSE FROM AH0A
__________________________________________________ ______

Thanks for taking the time to respond, although your last comment was
a bit strong.

The idea behind the petition was to try to retain some "merit" badge
testing


It's not govt's legitimate purpose to have "merit badge testing."

and a "reward" for learning. I fail to understand why removing Morse
testing is any different from removing all aspects of RTTY knowledge
from the written test, e.g. "T8A10. What would you connect to a
transceiver for RTTY operation?".


Clearly AH0A can't understand (or accept) that the RTTY example
is "theoretical knowledge" and the Morse test is a test of a mechanical
skill ... while I don't advocate it, a touch-typing test would be more
relevant to the future of ham radio than a Morse test.

[snip]

Anyway I want to assure you I that I put thought into the petition and
sincerely believe that CW testing for CW privileges was a compromise.


It appears that AH0A either did not read the R&O in 98-143 and the
denials of the Petitions for Reconsideration that were filed, or he didn't
understand/accept what the FCC clearly said.

Carl - wk3c