Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Sometime in May I expect to be moving into a new house, built on Pacific Northwest coastal Sand. It is at 100' elevation about 1/3 mile from where the Siuslaw river dumps into the Pacific Ocean. In the past, I usually drive at least one decent 8' ground rod outside my shack for a station ground, but am wondering what you guys might advise in this regard with having sand instead of dirt. Ed K7AAT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed_G" wrote in message . 192.196... Sometime in May I expect to be moving into a new house, built on Pacific Northwest coastal Sand. It is at 100' elevation about 1/3 mile from where the Siuslaw river dumps into the Pacific Ocean. In the past, I usually drive at least one decent 8' ground rod outside my shack for a station ground, but am wondering what you guys might advise in this regard with having sand instead of dirt. Ed K7AAT longer fatter rods, more of them, add horizontal buried radials, the same thing you would do in any other poor grounding situation... except in sand its much easier to bury radials and drive more rods than if you are sitting on rock, so do more of it. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . 196,
"Ed_G" wrote: Sometime in May I expect to be moving into a new house, built on Pacific Northwest coastal Sand. It is at 100' elevation about 1/3 mile from where the Siuslaw river dumps into the Pacific Ocean. In the past, I usually drive at least one decent 8' ground rod outside my shack for a station ground, but am wondering what you guys might advise in this regard with having sand instead of dirt. Ed K7AAT To bad you can't get at the ReBar in the concrete pad your new house may be built on. That grid, if tied together properly, would make a JimDandy Low Impedance RF Ground. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce in alaska wrote:
In article . 196, "Ed_G" wrote: Sometime in May I expect to be moving into a new house, built on Pacific Northwest coastal Sand. It is at 100' elevation about 1/3 mile from where the Siuslaw river dumps into the Pacific Ocean. In the past, I usually drive at least one decent 8' ground rod outside my shack for a station ground, but am wondering what you guys might advise in this regard with having sand instead of dirt. Ed K7AAT To bad you can't get at the ReBar in the concrete pad your new house may be built on. That grid, if tied together properly, would make a JimDandy Low Impedance RF Ground. Locate a piece of rebar in the concrete and carefully chip the concrete away until you reach the metal. Then attach a heavy gage wire to the rebar and close the hole with concrete patch. You will now have access to the grounding grid. Dave WD9BDZ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() longer fatter rods, more of them, add horizontal buried radials, the same thing you would do in any other poor grounding situation... except in sand its much easier to bury radials and drive more rods than if you are sitting on rock, so do more of it. Thanks, Dave. That is probably what I may do, I don't want to be putting in overkill for my situation ( that would be rods every 8 feet all around the house and connected by #0 copper! ). I'm more interested in grounding for electrical safety than lightning protection. I'll probably just put in two or three standard 8' rods and connect them with large copper cable. My question was aimed more at wondering how effective for this purpose a ground rod or three would be in sand...... And thanks to those who mentioned the rebar grid... but this house is on pillars, with rebar only in the perimeter foundation.... and well embedded in the center of the concrete, at that, so as to preclude any access. Ed K7AAT |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed_G wrote:
Thanks, Dave. That is probably what I may do, I don't want to be putting in overkill for my situation ( that would be rods every 8 feet all around the house and connected by #0 copper! ). I'm more interested in grounding for electrical safety than lightning protection. I'll probably just put in two or three standard 8' rods and connect them with large copper cable. My question was aimed more at wondering how effective for this purpose a ground rod or three would be in sand...... And thanks to those who mentioned the rebar grid... but this house is on pillars, with rebar only in the perimeter foundation.... and well embedded in the center of the concrete, at that, so as to preclude any access. For an electrical safety ground, you should follow the requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC). Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Ed_G wrote: Thanks, Dave. That is probably what I may do, I don't want to be putting in overkill for my situation ( that would be rods every 8 feet all around the house and connected by #0 copper! ). I'm more interested in grounding for electrical safety than lightning protection. I'll probably just put in two or three standard 8' rods and connect them with large copper cable. My question was aimed more at wondering how effective for this purpose a ground rod or three would be in sand...... And thanks to those who mentioned the rebar grid... but this house is on pillars, with rebar only in the perimeter foundation.... and well embedded in the center of the concrete, at that, so as to preclude any access. For an electrical safety ground, you should follow the requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC). Roy Lewallen, W7EL That was my thinking for electrical safety and not for RF. Local conditions vary and change over the years. Ask the building inspector what is required for your area. In my area it is two 8 foot ground rods spaced so far apart. I don't deal with the codes so can not tell the distance, but it is probably around 6 feet apart and connected by a continious conductor back to the breaker box. I think it is atleast # 6 copper wire for the ground. Whatever you do , connect all the grounds around the house together, including the antenna and cable/phone lines if you have them. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David G. Nagel" wrote in message et... Locate a piece of rebar in the concrete and carefully chip the concrete away until you reach the metal. Then attach a heavy gage wire to the rebar and close the hole with concrete patch. You will now have access to the grounding grid. Dave WD9BDZ One should never have any rebar exposed to the air. It will rust and expand breaking the concrete. If put in correctly, it will be about 3 inches inside the concrete. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() For an electrical safety ground, you should follow the requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC). Roy Lewallen, W7EL True, but rather impractical for most hams, I suspect. I would have to run a #6 or larger cable over 100' to bond the ground rod just outside my ham shack to the building power entry ground. So.... would I be better off just relying on the wall outlet ground to my equipment? I'm just looking for electrical power safety, plus a little help in possible static dissipation. Ed K7AAT |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Feb 2008 19:57:16 GMT, "Ed_G"
wrote: True, but rather impractical for most hams, I suspect. Hi Ed, The risk of life is a major issue of practicality. I would have to run a #6 or larger cable over 100' to bond the ground rod just outside my ham shack to the building power entry ground. I will take your word for it and presume that it also conforms to code. So.... would I be better off just relying on the wall outlet ground to my equipment? I'm just looking for electrical power safety, plus a little help in possible static dissipation. OK, let's say for the sake of argument that you did NOT do the 100' tying together of grounds. Let's further consider why there are ground rods driven and linked in the first place = all grounds are not all at the same potential. Hint: ground is inhabited by both resistances and currents. Those currents through those resistances create a potential difference. I am not speaking of "static" but honest to goodness 60Hz power. I can full well anticipate that you are bridging this potential with a coaxial cable out to a remote feed point - not uncommon at all. Let's take that to be a fact and proceed to another common action that is frequently taken. Let's say you are having problems with noise in your rigs, or strange modulations riding on your signal, or tuning issues. You might reach for the antenna connector behind your tuner. The tuner is strapped to ground, and the cable's coaxial shield supplies this ground to that remote drive point. As you lean over the tuner, you hold it with one hand, you grab the coax connector shell, unscrew it and as it separates from the jack connection the ground currents seek the path formerly through the coax shield and instead travel through you, hand to hand - across the heart, and you are killed. Where do we send the flowers? p.s. By the way, all those problems I described that caused you to remove that connector? They come from poor grounding exactly as described. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
grounding | Antenna | |||
Showdown in the Sand. | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
grounding | Antenna |