Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy, W7EL wrote:
"No, that`s not true. The radiation at zero elevation angle is zero for any antenna height and ground conductivity, even "extremely low"." We need no simplified quotes nor formulas. Reflection requires a "discontinuity". The resistance of free space is 377 ohms. As long as a traveling wave in space encounters 377 ohms, its velocity and trajectory are not altered. "Extremely low" could include a soil that for practical purposes appears to the wave as 377 ohms. Surely the earth could be absorbent and not highly reflective. In that case, the reflected wave reaching a distant observer or antenna would come practically from the incident wave alone. 377-ohm earth may be hard to come by. Sheets impregnated with carbon were invnted by Winfield Salisbury at the Harvard Radio Research Laboratory during WW-2. These cloth sheets are patented and are called Salisbury sheets. A similar technique was contemporaneously developed in Germany by J. Jaumann. So it`s not likely to just happen upon completely non-reflective soil. But, surely most soil absorbs some energy from the wave striking it. So, the reflection from the soil will be weakened and will be unequal to the task of completely canceling the incident wave. Cancellation at zero degrees will be incomplete. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |