Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy perpetual arguers!
Here is the good one for you on eHam.net http://www.eham.net/articles/6512 between yours truly (right) and Tom, W8JI (wrong). It centers around the argument that the RF current in the antenna loading coils is (or not) equal. Classic case of "theory" (wrongly applied) to real life measurements and facts. There is referenced previous article that started it all and on my budding web site www.K3BU.us full text with pictures at http://www.k3bu.us/loadingcoils.htm It looks like this factor is not properly accommodated in modeling programs using loading inductors in antenna elements. In view of the above, time permitting, I will try to do some work and try to shed some more light on the subject. Any experiences out there, rather than more "reasons" why it ain't so? Proper accommodation in modeling programs can give substantial improvement in loaded elements modeling. Let the games begin :-) Yuri, K3BU |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |