Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello:
Went to R/S today to pick up some BNC connectors to make a short coax patch wire. Was somewhat surprised to see that they only carry, now, the "screw-on" variety. No more soldered ones. Apparently you insert the stripped end of the coax into the connector, and twist a portion of the rear of the connector barrel which clamps the braid. My guess is that this probably is OK for the braid, but I can't imagine how it connects, relaiably, to the center pin. Looking at it in the package, it seems the coax wire just pokes into the center pin, and that's that. Maybe they expect gravity to make a contact. Seems like this would make a really poor connector, but perhaps I'm too old fashioned in thinking that the only good contact is a soldered one. Am I missing anything here ? Do they actually work ? Work good enough for a receiver's coax run ? Thanks, Bob |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Passaneau" wrote in message ... Hi: I like the crimp on BNC's myself but the solder kind are OK. The twist on RS ones are probably OK in low frequency low power but I wouldn't trust them myself. In fact, I wouldn't buy one except in desperation. Your concerns are the same ones I have. As I can buy Amphonal crimp BNC's for $1.85 each anywhere, I would invest $50 in a crimp tool and go that route. I also have serious doubts about the screw-on BNCs for anything but low power and low frequency - they may work moderately well for video, but I wouldn't trust them for RF either. WRT the crimped variety, the military uses them extensively and test data seems to clearly indicate that they are 1) easier to assemble correctly, given the correct strip lengths and crimping tool, and 2) if properly assembled they are at least as reliable as soldered BNCs and probably moreso. I use crimp BNCs exclusively when I want BNC connectors. 73, Carl - wk3c |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:26:46 -0000, "Carl R. Stevenson"
wrote: I also have serious doubts about the screw-on BNCs for anything but low power and low frequency - they may work moderately well for video, but I wouldn't trust them for RF either. Hi Carl, I've measured the properties of BNC/RG-58 out into the GHz and aside from loss (easily referenced by numerous sources), there are no surprises. If you trust them for Video, that makes them premium choices as Video is far more demanding than RF (at least into the HF). However, as terms, Video and RF are hardly distinctive except that Video describes an implicit bandwidth and modulation (which encompasses much of the HF) which is, of necessity, RF. So, the choice is: do you use BNC for 100KHz-12MHz Video; or do you use BNC for 100KHz - 1GHz RF? People only abandon BNC for small geometry considerations: components too close together for breakdown at high power at high frequency or too small for the currents involved. Actually, most of those arguments are cable based. In other words, if you don't trust BNC for any of a variety of reasons, you are actually arguing against the use of the associated cable it comfortably mates to. SO/PL are larger dimensionally, but beyond VHF they are definitely inferior to the smaller BNC. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Went to R/S today to pick up some BNC connectors to make a short coax patch wire. Was somewhat surprised to see that they only carry, now, the "screw-on" variety. No more soldered ones. Apparently you insert the stripped end of the coax into the connector, and twist a portion of the rear of the connector barrel which clamps the braid. My guess is that this probably is OK for the braid, but I can't imagine how it connects, relaiably, to the center pin. Looking at it in the package, it seems the coax wire just pokes into the center pin, and that's that. Maybe they expect gravity to make a contact. Seems like this would make a really poor connector, but perhaps I'm too old fashioned in thinking that the only good contact is a soldered one. Am I missing anything here ? Do they actually work ? Work good enough for a receiver's coax run ? Almost nothing from RS works very well . They do have some already built things with a good reputaion but you have to be careful even then. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Almost nothing from RS works very well .
That's a very general statement Ralph. I have bought electronic components and various connectors from Radio Shack for 28 years and all worked. (works, works well, or works very well, take your pick). I paid more for them, but that was because they were the only place I could get the stuff I needed locally. I have bought things from my local electronics supply house lately that didn't work, and they are not open on weekends. RS doesn't manufacture their components or connectors. They are reselling. I for one am glad they do, they have saved me time and money persuing this Hobby. As to whether the solderless BNC connector works, the RS one will work as good or bad as OEM. 73 Gary N4AST |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:26:46 -0000, "Carl R. Stevenson" wrote: I also have serious doubts about the screw-on BNCs for anything but low power and low frequency - they may work moderately well for video, but I wouldn't trust them for RF either. Hi Carl, I've measured the properties of BNC/RG-58 out into the GHz and aside from loss (easily referenced by numerous sources), there are no surprises. If you trust them for Video, that makes them premium choices as Video is far more demanding than RF (at least into the HF). However, as terms, Video and RF are hardly distinctive except that Video describes an implicit bandwidth and modulation (which encompasses much of the HF) which is, of necessity, RF. So, the choice is: do you use BNC for 100KHz-12MHz Video; or do you use BNC for 100KHz - 1GHz RF? People only abandon BNC for small geometry considerations: components too close together for breakdown at high power at high frequency or too small for the currents involved. Actually, most of those arguments are cable based. In other words, if you don't trust BNC for any of a variety of reasons, you are actually arguing against the use of the associated cable it comfortably mates to. SO/PL are larger dimensionally, but beyond VHF they are definitely inferior to the smaller BNC. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Richard, I know well that BNCs are good into the GHz range - if properly installed to maintain impedance. My reservation is not with BNCs, but with the screw-on variety, which I don't trust. Properly installed solder-on BNCs or crimped ones are fine. I prefer the crimp ones myself as they are easier to install and at least as reliable as the soldered ones. I think you missed my point - I hope this clarifies. 73, Carl - wk3c |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JGBOYLES" wrote in message ... Almost nothing from RS works very well . That's a very general statement Ralph. I have bought electronic components and various connectors from Radio Shack for 28 years and all worked. (works, works well, or works very well, take your pick). I paid more for them, but that was because they were the only place I could get the stuff I needed locally. I have bought things from my local electronics supply house lately that didn't work, and they are not open on weekends. RS doesn't manufacture their components or connectors. They are reselling. I for one am glad they do, they have saved me time and money persuing this Hobby. As to whether the solderless BNC connector works, the RS one will work as good or bad as OEM. 73 Gary N4AST Last time I went into my local Radio Shack, I found they didn't stock 50 ohm coax anymore. Special order; yes. On the shelf; no. Ed wb6wsn |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last time I went into my local Radio Shack, I found they didn't stock 50 ohm
coax anymore. Sad but true. From what I understand RS made nothing from their electronic parts, did it as a favor to us experimenters. Must be same with coax now. How much could they make on a 10 cent resistor pack? I hope they keep the parts section open, but afraid it won't be much longer. 73 Gary N4AST |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shucks,
Why not use F connectors? Jack K9CUN |