Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Came across a couple of those RF antenna current meters. Typical they
have a scale up to three of five amps. One is US and other is UK war surplus. AIUI the meter movement is driven by a small DC current produced from the output of the thermocouple. The thermocouple being heated by the RF current. Looks like the meter itself is a one or five milliamp movement. Can anyone comment/advise? Thanks. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, they could be either a self-contained meter; one that one hooks up
directly, inline/series, with the RF current and the other is as you have described. If the meters are not of the sealed type, you can remove the movement from the shell and have a look. Try and see if there's a thermocouple mounted somewhere as an integral part of the unit. Meters, like on the TCS, BC-191/375, and the ART-13 for example, are self-contained. They generally all work the same, its just where the thermocouple is located. That's my observation on the subject..... terryS wrote: Came across a couple of those RF antenna current meters. Typical they have a scale up to three of five amps. One is US and other is UK war surplus. AIUI the meter movement is driven by a small DC current produced from the output of the thermocouple. The thermocouple being heated by the RF current. Looks like the meter itself is a one or five milliamp movement. Can anyone comment/advise? Thanks. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The May 1969 issue of Popular Electronics has plans to make a 5 Amp. AC
Ammeter out of a BC-442 meter. It uses 300 ohm twin lead as a 0.1375 ohm shunt. They show 31" plus 1/2" for connections at each end. I have the proper meter but never acquired the thermocouple. K3HVG wrote: Well, they could be either a self-contained meter; one that one hooks up directly, inline/series, with the RF current and the other is as you have described. If the meters are not of the sealed type, you can remove the movement from the shell and have a look. Try and see if there's a thermocouple mounted somewhere as an integral part of the unit. Meters, like on the TCS, BC-191/375, and the ART-13 for example, are self-contained. They generally all work the same, its just where the thermocouple is located. That's my observation on the subject..... terryS wrote: Came across a couple of those RF antenna current meters. Typical they have a scale up to three of five amps. One is US and other is UK war surplus. AIUI the meter movement is driven by a small DC current produced from the output of the thermocouple. The thermocouple being heated by the RF current. Looks like the meter itself is a one or five milliamp movement. Can anyone comment/advise? Thanks. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Hall wrote:
The May 1969 issue of Popular Electronics has plans to make a 5 Amp. AC Ammeter out of a BC-442 meter. It uses 300 ohm twin lead as a 0.1375 ohm shunt. They show 31" plus 1/2" for connections at each end. I have the proper meter but never acquired the thermocouple. What type is the thermocouple? If it's a Type J or K, I probably have some junk box stuff. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can easily determine if the meter is a remote reading meter or one with
a built in thermocouple. Put a digital ohmmeter on the meter leads. if the resistance is very low, then the thermocuple is built in. If the resistance reads tens of ohms or more, it is a simple dc meter that can be used for any purpose. I have found that many of the remote reading meters are not calibrated in actual amps, but are relative reading. Often the rf ammeters that are self contained contain a bakelite or formica back to give clearance to the rf. Colin K7FM |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"terryS" wrote: Came across a couple of those RF antenna current meters. Typical they have a scale up to three of five amps. One is US and other is UK war surplus. AIUI the meter movement is driven by a small DC current produced from the output of the thermocouple. The thermocouple being heated by the RF current. Looks like the meter itself is a one or five milliamp movement. Can anyone comment/advise? Thanks. The British ones (black bakelite cases) almost always have the thermocouple built into the meter. They will usually be marked "Thermocouple" or "For Radio Frequency Only" on the dial, and the resistance is usually shown as well. Be careful: the thermocouple is *VERY* delicate and will not stand up to overload - the nichrome wire melts and it's useless thereafter. (I've blown up an ex-Admiralty plug-in meter that was scaled 0-500mA but had "requires x20 shunt" pencilled very faintly on the back.) Chris. -- If it doesn't contravene the Criminal Justice Act (1988) it has no place in a kitchen. -- Peter Corlett in the scary devil monastery. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 8:57 am, (Chris Suslowicz) wrote:
In article .com, "terryS" wrote: Came across a couple of those RF antenna current meters. Typical they have a scale up to three of five amps. One is US and other is UK war surplus. AIUI the meter movement is driven by a small DC current produced from the output of the thermocouple. The thermocouple being heated by the RF current. Looks like the meter itself is a one or five milliamp movement. Can anyone comment/advise? Thanks. The British ones (black bakelite cases) almost always have the thermocouple built into the meter. They will usually be marked "Thermocouple" or "For Radio Frequency Only" on the dial, and the resistance is usually shown as well. Be careful: the thermocouple is *VERY* delicate and will not stand up to overload - the nichrome wire melts and it's useless thereafter. (I've blown up an ex-Admiralty plug-in meter that was scaled 0-500mA but had "requires x20 shunt" pencilled very faintly on the back.) Chris. Thanks Chris and others. Part of what I was wondering is a seemingly 'dud' RF ammeter. The movement might be OK and could be, say, 1 or 5 milliamp etc. fsd. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somebody recently said they might have a suitable thermocouple in their
junk box and asked which type the meter used. The article, in the May 1969 issue of Popular Electronics, doesn't say. Here's the article: http://206.124.141.169/albums/acammeter/index.htm |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"terryS" wrote: Thanks Chris and others. Part of what I was wondering is a seemingly 'dud' RF ammeter. The movement might be OK and could be, say, 1 or 5 milliamp etc. fsd. Ah, right. In that case: The ex-RAF meters (marked A (crown) M for Air Ministry) have the resistance wire soldered directly to the back of the terminals on the case. The thermocouple is then spotwelded to the middle of the resistance wire, and one lead goes to one side of the movement directly, the other goes via a "coil spring" of nichrome resistance wire (length cut to get the thermocouple calibration correct) to the other side of the movement. If it's open circuit across the terminals, then the resistance element has blown. The thermocouple and movement should still be perfectly OK. (I've considered trying to replace the resistance wire but calibrating it will be the difficult part.) Somewhere I have a box of dead meters.... I may be some time. Chris. -- Most uses of "spider" have noninsect meanings. -- Christine Malcom-Dept. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 3:26 pm, (Chris Suslowicz) wrote:
In article .com, "terryS" wrote: Thanks Chris and others. Part of what I was wondering is a seemingly 'dud' RF ammeter. The movement might be OK and could be, say, 1 or 5 milliamp etc. fsd. Ah, right. In that case: The ex-RAF meters (marked A (crown) M for Air Ministry) have the resistance wire soldered directly to the back of the terminals on the case. The thermocouple is then spotwelded to the middle of the resistance wire, and one lead goes to one side of the movement directly, the other goes via a "coil spring" of nichrome resistance wire (length cut to get the thermocouple calibration correct) to the other side of the movement. If it's open circuit across the terminals, then the resistance element has blown. The thermocouple and movement should still be perfectly OK. (I've considered trying to replace the resistance wire but calibrating it will be the difficult part.) Somewhere I have a box of dead meters.... I may be some time. Chris. -- Most uses of "spider" have noninsect meanings. -- Christine Malcom-Dept. Back in the old marine electronics days we had those 410 to 512 Kcs MF transmitters. They were all required to have built in RF Ammeters. The transmitters had to meet minimum SOLAS radiation requirements by multiplying the RF current by the antenna height above the deepest water line. Usually they were 15 amps or 5 amps fsd (15 for the main tx and 5 for the emergency tx). These meters were pretty accurate on mf but some of the transmitters used them on hf also. On hf they were only accurate depending on the length of antenna/frequency, where the current node is. We are talking a single wire type feeder. At mf the current is pretty much the same anywhere on the antenna due to the long wavelength. I still see some of these meters being sold at hamfests. Virtually every RF Ammeter used had a built-in shunt. Randy, wb5kcm |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch | Antenna | |||
Current and voltage distribution on an antenna. | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
FA: BC442 Antenna current meter / relay unit | Boatanchors |