Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:54:11 +0000, Hank wrote:
Heathkit made a Q-meter kit that was patterned after the Boonton, but simplified. I had one of these for years, and got quite a bit of use out of it, but the 260A is a step up in capability and accuracy. Hank Since you mentioned the Heathkit unit, I have one that I haven't done anything with since I don't have the special inductor to calibrate it. I also don't have any way to measure an ordinary inductor to use as a substitute. Do you know of some other way to calibrate it? Thanks, -- Jim Mueller To get my real email address, replace wrongname with dadoheadman. Then replace nospam with fastmail. Lastly, replace com with us. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:54:11 +0000, Hank wrote: Heathkit made a Q-meter kit that was patterned after the Boonton, but simplified. I had one of these for years, and got quite a bit of use out of it, but the 260A is a step up in capability and accuracy. Since you mentioned the Heathkit unit, I have one that I haven't done anything with since I don't have the special inductor to calibrate it. I also don't have any way to measure an ordinary inductor to use as a substitute. Do you know of some other way to calibrate it? Purchase a reference inductor from J. W. Miller? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:54:11 +0000, Hank wrote: Heathkit made a Q-meter kit that was patterned after the Boonton, but simplified. I had one of these for years, and got quite a bit of use out of it, but the 260A is a step up in capability and accuracy. Hank Since you mentioned the Heathkit unit, I have one that I haven't done anything with since I don't have the special inductor to calibrate it. I also don't have any way to measure an ordinary inductor to use as a substitute. Do you know of some other way to calibrate it? Thanks, When I got mine I sent a few of my coils out to another guy to measure them. Then I used his findings to set up my Heathkit. Everything was pretty close from the get go. -Bill |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article om,
Jim Mueller wrote: On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:54:11 +0000, Hank wrote: Heathkit made a Q-meter kit that was patterned after the Boonton, but simplified. I had one of these for years, and got quite a bit of use out of it, but the 260A is a step up in capability and accuracy. Hank Since you mentioned the Heathkit unit, I have one that I haven't done anything with since I don't have the special inductor to calibrate it. I also don't have any way to measure an ordinary inductor to use as a substitute. Do you know of some other way to calibrate it? If you've got the unit, you can use a 455 khz IF transformer to check out its functionality. Most of these used in AA5's had coil Q around 100. There are probably ten or twenty different ways to getting a reasonable calibration, depending on what other test equipment you have available and your knowledge and skill in methodologies for using them. Also consider what your intended use of the Q-meter is. For getting front-end coils and IF transformers in a receiver you are bringing back to life, your primary need is to find coil inductance and whether the Q is "reasonable" or "not reasonable." There is a good discussion of Q measurements and a section on Q meters and their vagaries in Terman and Pettit "Electronic Measurements" (2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1952). What that makes clear is that absolute measurements with a Q meter have enough error that they're only indicative of in-circuit performance. Your first calibration point is to set up the injection oscillator. That's a frequency measurement, traceable to NIST through WWV. The second calibration point is the tracking of the resonating capacitor to the panel calibrations. The third calibration point is the oscillator injection voltage across the metering resistor. The fourth calibration point is the voltage developed across the coil at resonance. "Q" is the ratio of that voltage to the injection voltage. If you've got something like an RF VTVM available, you can measure the two voltages directly. You probably are not going to want to go through the gyrations needed to refer anything but the frequency measurement back to NIST. A quick search on the net with Duckduckgo came up with this link: http://www.jamminpower.com/main/260A.html It's got links to 260A user and calibration manuals. The Heath unit is a cheap knock-off of the Boonton design, so the Boonton material generally applies to it. The Heath unit is quite adequate for repair bench work. The unit I had did yeoman service before I got the first 260A. While mine came with the standard coil, it got its calibration checks with nothing better than a Tek 547 scope and Tek signal generator, with a variety of coils used as a cross-check. Hank |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hank" wrote in message ... In article , Richard Knoppow wrote: "Clutter" wrote in message ... On 05/19/2012 12:08 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote: "Renan wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I am looking for a VR-300 ,( 95 - 130 volts, 60Hz Voltage Stibilizer ) used In BOONTON Q Meter 190A. Please, If available, let me know the value. Thank you in advance! There are two mailing lists that may be of help. One is the Agilent-Hewlett-Packard list and the other is the Boonton list. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hp_agilent_equipment/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Boonton/ Thanks for the Yahoo groups info. I didn't know about those two. I joined the Boonton group as I have a couple of 260A's both in need of repair to some degree. Now if I can just find some time to work on them... There are probably a few people on one or the other of those groups who know the 260A well. At -hp- all the Boonton stuff was done by a couple of specialists who did nothing else. I think the 260A is reasonably easy to get operational, the 250A RX meter was a bear to get calibrated and the older 160A Q-Meter requires a special tube which was selected. Boonton liked using selected tubes, one of the 202 series RF generators used three tubes of the same type but selected for different characteristics. A royal PITA. There have been a couple of other Q meters made but the 260A is still an excellent instrument. The trouble is that most people now have no idea of what they do or how to use one. I have to chuckle at the idea that people don't know the value of Boonton Q meters and the 250A RX bridge. I cut my teeth on the 160A and 190A Q meters and the 250A when I went to work for James Millen in 1956. Forty years later, when equipping a bench for doing some serious work with boatanchors, I located a 260A---got it working, but it was a cosmetic horror, so when someone gave me a non-working but cosmetically clean 260A with a tentative diagnosis of a burned-out thermocouple, I took it. However, it turned out that the thermocouple was not burned out, just had a bad solder connection at one end of the heater wire. The 260A (as I recall, a 1953 redesign of the mid-1930's 160A) is not particularly difficult to work on. Biggest problem I found with both was poor contact with the oscillator turret pins and open oscillator coils. The open coils all were breakage at the turret pins, very easy fix. But the brass pins and contacts took abrasive work to get them to make contact. DeOxit D-5 didn't touch them. The 160A used a selected 45 tube for the oscillator, and the thermocouple burned out quite easily. The 260A uses an off-the-shelf tube--5763 as I recall---so that component is a plug-and-play replacement. The 260A thermocouple is much more robust. I've forgotten what was in the 190A, though I've been inside all of them at one time or another. The VTVM tube is selected in all of them. Boonton supported these units with excellent manuals which go into great detail about how they can be use. That's true of the RX Bridge as well. The Q-meters are not at all difficult to calibrate by the procedures given by Boonton. When push comes to shove, there is nothing like a good Q-meter when dealing with boatanchor front-end and IF coils. One strand of broken Litzendraht drop the Q of a coil significantly, and having a Q-meter available to get the exact capacitor needed for a silver-mica failure makes life very simple. Of course, a Measurements Megacycle Meter or Millen Grid Dip complement them nicely, but aren't substitutes. The 250A RX Bridge was, I think, a bit daunting for 1930's/1940's radio EE's. The Chief Engineer at Millen, Wade Caywood, bought one for the company, and spent quite a bit of time experimenting with how best to use it. Mine came out from under a table at a hamfest---not working, but looked brand new, and when the guy said he wanted $20 for it I swapped cash for the bridge and immediately took it out to my car. All that was wrong with it was that the Amperex ballast tube was open, so no voltage to the IF strip heaters. I just used wire-wound resistors to set the voltage. I don't recall having to fix any oscillator problems, but the mica dialectric in the little capacitor at the front of the bridge had to be reglued in place (Pliobond). The bridge was calibrated after it was assembled, so you really do not want to fuss with it. I'd have to say that to get real mileage out of these boxes, particularly the RX bridge, you've got to know a bit more than you're going to learn from the ARRL Handbooks or Fred Terman's texts. I have used the Marconi Q-meter, which also uses a special (read "unobtainium") tube, but you have to have both of the power oscillators that go with it. Heathkit made a Q-meter kit that was patterned after the Boonton, but simplified. I had one of these for years, and got quite a bit of use out of it, but the 260A is a step up in capability and accuracy. I'm not sure what Boonton was thinking when they put the voltage stabilizers in the Q-meters and the ballast in the RX bridge. Unless your primary power is seriously off-voltage, I don't see that they are needed. Hank The 190A uses a diode rather than a thermocouple. The diode runs, I think, in its square-law region and is the only tube in the instrument that was selected. I don't know what measurements were made on this tube. The meter scale will not track properly if the tube characteristics are not right. However, the tubes are very long lived and can not be burned out. The thermocouple in the 260-A is much harder to damage than the one in the 160-A but one must still use some care in setting the oscillator level. Both handbooks have pretty good texts on Q and its significance and additional literature was available from Boonton, most, if not all, of which is on the web. A couple of standard coils for the meters are useful for checking but overall calibration, as you say, does not need them. Working coils are very easy to make. The RX meter requires some study, it is not a general purpose bridge. Mainly, the Q-Meters are intended for relatively high-Q circuits and the RX-Meter for low-Q circuits. The RX meter is excellent for measuring the RF characteristics of resistors. All three of these guys, but especially the RX-Meter are true boatanchors:-) -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Renan Cysneiros" wrote in message ... Richard Knoppow;791746 Wrote: "Hank" wrote in message ...- In article , Richard Knoppow wrote:- "Clutter" wrote in message ...- On 05/19/2012 12:08 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote: "Renan wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I am looking for a VR-300 ,( 95 - 130 volts, 60Hz Voltage Stibilizer ) used In BOONTON Q Meter 190A. Please, If available, let me know the value. Thank you in advance! I would like to thank all ones that added valuable informations concerning to these wonders of electronics, developed in a part of time where art merges with the knowledge. With respect to the voltage stabilizer used in 190A, q meter, which I cited earlier in this topic, I decided to open it, it was not difficult as it sounds! wrapped in a black sealant ( asphalt derived) I found a transformer with reactor coupled to it and a large oil capacitor (1.75 Uf / 660 vac, Aerovox) the capacitor was swollen and in short circuit , as was expected because age. I replaced it by 4x 470uF / 630volts, polyester metallized,When I turned on the electric supply 114volts 60Hertz , the output was 127 volts, I have found information about this type of transformer in the excellent book (Transforming and Inductor Design Handbook by Colonel Wm. T. McLyman) recalculated the capacitor based on the measured voltages, found 1.58 Uf, then removed one , leaving a capacitor of approximately 1.41Uf ( 3x 470 Uf ), the output is now 116 volts. The Q meter is running ok , I hope to get a standard coil to check it. Renan PP7HP Maceió - AL , Brazil Who made the transformer in your 190? I have a 190 where the transformer runs hot. It may be that the cap is getting leaky. It still regulates at the right voltage but is very hot. -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL -- Renan Cysneiros |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the suggestions and especially the links to more information.
I haven't had time to read them yet but I did download and save them for when that time comes. A quick glance at them already gave ideas on how to get my meter going without a standard inductor, although that method would be much easier! -- Jim Mueller To get my real email address, replace wrongname with dadoheadman. Then replace nospam with fastmail. Lastly, replace com with us. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
My transformer was manufactured by ACME electronic. Usually this type of transformer, works hot due to saturated core,” but not super hot”. As you reported, I suspect that the cap. is leaking, it's worth a look, even due to aging. I recommend use of capacitors in parallel, at least 3 for splitting the current (1Kvolt rated), 3 x 470nF, works fine in mine. I got my 190A via ebay in hong kong two months ago, and after about 20 min. turned on, the pilot lamp extinguished and the equipment comes down. Now, its ok. Greetings ! Renan – PP7HP Maceió , Brazil |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Renan Cysneiros" wrote in message ... Richard Knoppow;791819 Wrote: "Renan Cysneiros" wrote in message ...- Richard Knoppow;791746 Wrote:- "Hank" wrote in message ...- In article , Richard Knoppow wrote:- "Clutter" wrote in message ...- On 05/19/2012 12:08 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote: "Renan wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I am looking for a VR-300 ,( 95 - 130 volts, 60Hz Voltage Stibilizer ) used In BOONTON Q Meter 190A. Please, If available, let me know the value. Thank you in advance! - I would like to thank all ones that added valuable informations concerning to these wonders of electronics, developed in a part of time where art merges with the knowledge. With respect to the voltage stabilizer used in 190A, q meter, which I cited earlier in this topic, I decided to open it, it was not difficult as it sounds! wrapped in a black sealant ( asphalt derived) I found a transformer with reactor coupled to it and a large oil capacitor (1.75 Uf / 660 vac, Aerovox) the capacitor was swollen and in short circuit , as was expected because age. I replaced it by 4x 470uF / 630volts, polyester metallized,When I turned on the electric supply 114volts 60Hertz , the output was 127 volts, I have found information about this type of transformer in the excellent book (Transforming and Inductor Design Handbook by Colonel Wm. T. McLyman) recalculated the capacitor based on the measured voltages, found 1.58 Uf, then removed one , leaving a capacitor of approximately 1.41Uf ( 3x 470 Uf ), the output is now 116 volts. The Q meter is running ok , I hope to get a standard coil to check it. Renan PP7HP Maceió - AL , Brazil - Who made the transformer in your 190? I have a 190 where the transformer runs hot. It may be that the cap is getting leaky. It still regulates at the right voltage but is very hot. -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL - -- Renan Cysneiros - Dear Richard, My transformer was manufactured by ACME electronic. Usually this type of transformer, works hot due to saturated core,” but not super hot”. As you reported, I suspect that the cap. is leaking, it's worth a look, even due to aging. I recommend use of capacitors in parallel, at least 3 for splitting the current (1Kvolt rated), 3 x 470nF, works fine in mine. I got my 190A via ebay in hong kong two months ago, and after about 20 min. turned on, the pilot lamp extinguished and the equipment comes down. Now, its ok. Greetings ! Renan – PP7HP Maceió , Brazil Thanks Renan, I don't remember who made the transformer in my 190A. I will have a look and see about getting into it. It gets hot enough to melt the potting material. The transformer in my 260A Q-Meter is cool to the touch even after its been running for an extended time which makes me thing this one should be the same. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Voltage Calibration | Homebrew | |||
20A 24v to 12v DC voltage dropper | Homebrew | |||
dBm and Voltage | Homebrew | |||
Is this voltage doubler different? | Homebrew | |||
HT-37 Plate voltage | Boatanchors |