Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there anyone left who is familiar with calibration of a Millen 90651 grid
dip meter? I recently acquired a nice one, but the dial scale is a bit compressed and I need to discuss with someone the possibility of adjusting C3 and C4. -- 73, Floyd - K8AC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Floyd Sense wrote: Is there anyone left who is familiar with calibration of a Millen 90651 grid dip meter? I recently acquired a nice one, but the dial scale is a bit compressed and I need to discuss with someone the possibility of adjusting C3 and C4. -- 73, Floyd - K8AC The Millen grid dipper was never a calibrated ,or accurate device, to get an accurate reading ,tune a receiver to the desired frequency and set the dipper to the receiver ,You will be anble to get "in the ball park" Good Luck W4PQW |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Dale. Great idea. I was thinking that I no longer have a portable freq
counter - only a lab model - then remembered that my MFJ-259B has a freq counter mode. I just set up the Millen next to the MFJ with a 1' whip and was able to read the Millen frequency all the way up to 300 MHz just by getting within a couple of inches of the Millen coil. Your idea would give me a bit more flexibility and there's already a small hole in the side of the Millen cabinet (factory hole) that could be used for the cable exit. There's really no reason why the Millen analog scale couldn't be made to read out at 1% or better accuracy. I'm going to remove the dial scale and scan it and then relocate the index marks to be accurate. The corrected scale will then be transferred to a new dial sheet and installed in place of the old one. Sounds time consuming, but bound to be faster than screwing around with those immovable trimmer caps and more accurate in the end. Thanks for the idea. 73, Floyd - K8AC "Dale H. Cook" wrote in message ... On 17 Jan 2005 09:47:43 -0800, wrote: The Millen grid dipper was never a calibrated ,or accurate device, to get an accurate reading ,tune a receiver to the desired frequency and set the dipper to the receiver ,You will be anble to get "in the ball park" If you need accuracy an alternative is to install a small cap (~10 pf or less) connected to the plate of the tube and connected through, say, a piece of RG-174 to a BNC jack. That will let you connect a freq counter for accurate determination of the 90651 frequency. Dale H. Cook, Chief Engineer, WWWR Roanoke VA, WCQV Moneta VA, WKBA WZZI Vinton VA, WKPA WLNI WZZU Lynchburg VA, WMNA/WMNA-FM Gretna VA, WOWZ Appomattox VA http://members.cox.net/dalehcook/starcity.shtml |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Floyd:
Years ago, I decided to convert one of my Millen tube jobs to a solid state one, using the article in QST. It was an exercise more to see if I could do it than any other reason. When I got done, the 2 highest bands were off calibration. Sounds just about like yours. After looking at the options, I decided to simply make new scales for those bands. I did it by hand and the result looks quite good, although the paper is whiter than the original background. This is what ham radio is all about. Now, I suppose I will get death threats for converting a perfectly good Millen dip meter to solid state. The tube version is more sensitive, but I do not need an extension cord for the solid state version. 73, Colin K7FM --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "COLIN LAMB" wrote in message k.net... Hello Floyd: Years ago, I decided to convert one of my Millen tube jobs to a solid state one, using the article in QST. It was an exercise more to see if I could do it than any other reason. When I got done, the 2 highest bands were off calibration. Sounds just about like yours. After looking at the options, I decided to simply make new scales for those bands. I did it by hand and the result looks quite good, although the paper is whiter than the original background. This is what ham radio is all about. Now, I suppose I will get death threats for converting a perfectly good Millen dip meter to solid state. Personally, I think the 90651 in its original condition is one of the least practical grid dip meters around. It's big, heavy, and you need two hands to use it. On top of that, it is not that sensitive, and the sensitivity is not adjustable! If you want a real instrument, get a Boonton/Measurements Model 59. Unless yours serves as a shelf queen, I think any modification is an improvement! Go for it! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't recall ever seeing that QST article - perhaps you could tell me when
that was. Creating a new scale occurred to me as well and that may be what I end up doing. I can remove the current scale, scan it into the PC, and relocate the index marks with a graphics program. Then reprint it on film or whatever and no one would know the difference. On my highest coil range (up to 300 MHz,) which I would likely never use, the scale is on the button over most of the range, with readout that's accurate at 1% at 300 MHz. 73, K8AC "COLIN LAMB" wrote in message k.net... Hello Floyd: Years ago, I decided to convert one of my Millen tube jobs to a solid state one, using the article in QST. It was an exercise more to see if I could do it than any other reason. When I got done, the 2 highest bands were off calibration. Sounds just about like yours. After looking at the options, I decided to simply make new scales for those bands. I did it by hand and the result looks quite good, although the paper is whiter than the original background. This is what ham radio is all about. Now, I suppose I will get death threats for converting a perfectly good Millen dip meter to solid state. The tube version is more sensitive, but I do not need an extension cord for the solid state version. 73, Colin K7FM |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:08:14 GMT, "COLIN LAMB"
wrote: Years ago, I decided to convert one of my Millen tube jobs to a solid state one When I got done, the 2 highest bands were off calibration. That's because the inter-electrode capacitance of the tube is part of the tuned circuit. Dale H. Cook, Chief Engineer, WWWR Roanoke VA, WCQV Moneta VA, WKBA WZZI Vinton VA, WKPA WLNI WZZU Lynchburg VA, WMNA/WMNA-FM Gretna VA, WOWZ Appomattox VA http://members.cox.net/dalehcook/starcity.shtml |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"If you want a real instrument, get a Boonton/Measurements Model 59."
Boy, I will second that. I have a number of grid dip meters. The 59 is my favorite and blows all the others away. It is as close to perfection as anything should be. Colin K7FM --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
COLIN LAMB wrote:
"If you want a real instrument, get a Boonton/Measurements Model 59." Boy, I will second that. I have a number of grid dip meters. The 59 is my favorite and blows all the others away. It is as close to perfection as anything should be. Colin K7FM The Measurements 59 is a great little GDO. Two things you must be aware of, though: First is the coil sets are all slightly different in terms of their stray capacitance and inductance. As a result each set is serialized to the 59 frame it belongs with. The second is the frequency tics were hand penned onto the dial during calibration. Don't try and clean the dial! -Chuck Harris |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Millen 90651 calibration? | Equipment | |||
fA= MILLEN 90651 GRID DIP OSCILLATOR, Works @$15, Tomorrow! | Equipment | |||
fA= MILLEN 90651 GRID DIP OSCILLATOR, Works @$15, Tomorrow! | Equipment | |||
fa> MILLEN 90651 GRID DIP OSCILLATOR, Works- NR@$15 | Equipment | |||
fa> MILLEN 90651 GRID DIP OSCILLATOR, Works- NR@$15 | Equipment |