Does anyone have a idea what the value of a Collins R-388/uur receiver would
be?
It is in good condition.
Any help would be appreciated
Thank you in advance.

I buy all the time on ebay 250 to 350


"CSFD" wrote in message
. ..
Does anyone have a idea what the value of a Collins R-388/uur receiver
would
be?
It is in good condition.
Any help would be appreciated
Thank you in advance.

R388s, which do not have the mechanical filters
like the 51J4s, often go for high prices if they are
in excellent to "new" condition (the latter being quite
rare).

But as far as performance goes, 51J4s with the
filters are just great and provide greater flexibliity.

From: "CSFD"
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:08:27 GMT
Subject: Value of Collins R-388?

Does anyone have a idea what the value of a Collins R-388/uur receiver would
be?
It is in good condition.
Any help would be appreciated
Thank you in advance.

In article , Dan Robinson
writes:

R388s, which do not have the mechanical filters
like the 51J4s, often go for high prices if they are
in excellent to "new" condition (the latter being quite rare).

How does the value of an R388 compare with the nearly-identical 51J3?
Is there any functional difference? Do Collins collectors prefer the "pure"
51J3 to the military R-388?

But as far as performance goes, 51J4s with the
filters are just great and provide greater flexibliity.

Yep, when playing with my R388 I often wish for the better selectivity control
of the J4. Xtal filters just don't hack AM or SSB all that well.

Though I don't suppose even the J4 has a product detector, right?
73, Mike K. AA1UK


Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.

"Mike Knudsen" wrote in message
...
In article , Dan Robinson

writes:

R388s, which do not have the mechanical filters
like the 51J4s, often go for high prices if they are
in excellent to "new" condition (the latter being quite rare).

How does the value of an R388 compare with the nearly-identical 51J3?
Is there any functional difference? Do Collins collectors prefer the
"pure"
51J3 to the military R-388?

But as far as performance goes, 51J4s with the
filters are just great and provide greater flexibliity.

Yep, when playing with my R388 I often wish for the better selectivity
control
of the J4. Xtal filters just don't hack AM or SSB all that well.

Though I don't suppose even the J4 has a product detector, right?
73, Mike K. AA1UK

No, it did not have a product detector. I did do one author's mod to these
receivers over the years, where you convert the cathode follower for the
I.F. output to a product detector. It was great, because the mode switch on
the front panel has an extra set of contacts that you can use for routing
the audio.

Pete

There was one in good condition at the Salem, Oregon radio flea market at
Rickreall for 465 dollars and it didn't sell. 73 de Fred.

CSFD wrote:

Does anyone have a idea what the value of a Collins R-388/uur receiver would
be?
It is in good condition.
Any help would be appreciated
Thank you in advance.

In article , "Pete
KE9OA" writes:

No, it did not have a product detector. I did do one author's mod to these
receivers over the years, where you convert the cathode follower for the
I.F. output to a product detector. It was great, because the mode switch on
the front panel has an extra set of contacts that you can use for routing
the audio.

Would that mod also apply to the J3/R388? The need for extra audio switching
is a big problem in most PD mods, leading to use of relays in R390A for
example, with all kinds of problems. Don't recall seeing extra switch contacts
on my 388, maybe just on the J4.

Since the BFO switch is broken on my SP-600, I just might replace it with a
3PST switch (good luck) and put a PD tube in place of the BFO driveer. --Mike
K.

Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.

Mike Knudsen ) writes:
In article , "Pete
KE9OA" writes:

No, it did not have a product detector. I did do one author's mod to these
receivers over the years, where you convert the cathode follower for the
I.F. output to a product detector. It was great, because the mode switch on
the front panel has an extra set of contacts that you can use for routing
the audio.

Would that mod also apply to the J3/R388? The need for extra audio switching
is a big problem in most PD mods, leading to use of relays in R390A for
example, with all kinds of problems. Don't recall seeing extra switch contacts
on my 388, maybe just on the J4.

Since the BFO switch is broken on my SP-600, I just might replace it with a
3PST switch (good luck) and put a PD tube in place of the BFO driveer. --Mike
K.

Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.

Wasn't an old trick to put a relay in the line to the BFO? So when
you turn on the BFO with the existing switch, the current through
the relay causes it to switch, and then the relay contacts can
route the audio properly.

Michael

In article ,
(Michael Black) writes:

Wasn't an old trick to put a relay in the line to the BFO? So when
you turn on the BFO with the existing switch, the current through
the relay causes it to switch, and then the relay contacts can
route the audio properly.

Yes, that's how the previous owner of my R390A tried to do it, and I bought
another relay to try to improve on the job, since his was sticking ON. The two
problems a finding a relay sensitive enough to trigger on the BFO plate
current, and with enough contacts to do the switching, and cramming the relay
into the underside of the BFO sub chassis (no mouse droppings in there -- mice
can't fit inside!). Without messing up the AVC voltage into the ANL.

The R390A job is complicated by the natural desire not to run any extra wires
to the IF module and spoil the neat connectorization. 73, Mike K.

Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.

Hi Mike,
That mod should apply to all of the 51J series receivers. I know
for sure that it is on the J3 and J4, and on the R-388 version of the J3.

Pete

"Mike Knudsen" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Pete
KE9OA" writes:

No, it did not have a product detector. I did do one author's mod to
these
receivers over the years, where you convert the cathode follower for the
I.F. output to a product detector. It was great, because the mode switch
on
the front panel has an extra set of contacts that you can use for routing
the audio.

Would that mod also apply to the J3/R388? The need for extra audio
switching
is a big problem in most PD mods, leading to use of relays in R390A for
example, with all kinds of problems. Don't recall seeing extra switch
contacts
on my 388, maybe just on the J4.

Since the BFO switch is broken on my SP-600, I just might replace it with
a
3PST switch (good luck) and put a PD tube in place of the BFO
riveer. --Mike
K.

Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.