Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 31st 05, 05:58 PM
Dennis
 
Posts: n/a
Default Palomar Elite 300 Good for 10 Meters?

I have a chance to get a Palomar Elite 300 linear amp CHEAP! Is this
thing any good? I haven't been able to find any information on it and
it doesn't come with a manual. The questions I have a

Is this amp good for HF Freqs 10 meters down to 80 meters as the seller
claims?
What purpose does the preamp serve?
With a boost in transmitting power, how will this affect receiving?
Would I be transmitting further than I can actually receive?

Sorry for the dumb questions. I have absolutely no experience with
linears, and this little amp seems too good to be true, so it probably
is!
Anyone know where there's information online for this amp?

Thanks!

  #2   Report Post  
Old January 31st 05, 06:16 PM
Alan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's a CB amp - NOT a ham amp. Not legal.


"Dennis" wrote in message
oups.com...
I have a chance to get a Palomar Elite 300 linear amp CHEAP! Is this
thing any good? I haven't been able to find any information on it and
it doesn't come with a manual. The questions I have a

Is this amp good for HF Freqs 10 meters down to 80 meters as the seller
claims?
What purpose does the preamp serve?
With a boost in transmitting power, how will this affect receiving?
Would I be transmitting further than I can actually receive?

Sorry for the dumb questions. I have absolutely no experience with
linears, and this little amp seems too good to be true, so it probably
is!
Anyone know where there's information online for this amp?

Thanks!



  #3   Report Post  
Old February 1st 05, 04:41 AM
Dennis
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, I had a feeling about that and confirmed it earlier today. Thanks
Alan. I never got a chance to actually look at the amp close up so I
knew very little about it, including its FCC status. There's no cheap
way around this so guess it's back to HRO or Universal Radio.



Alan wrote:
That's a CB amp - NOT a ham amp. Not legal.


"Dennis" wrote in message
oups.com...
I have a chance to get a Palomar Elite 300 linear amp CHEAP! Is

this
thing any good? I haven't been able to find any information on it

and
it doesn't come with a manual. The questions I have a

Is this amp good for HF Freqs 10 meters down to 80 meters as the

seller
claims?
What purpose does the preamp serve?
With a boost in transmitting power, how will this affect receiving?
Would I be transmitting further than I can actually receive?

Sorry for the dumb questions. I have absolutely no experience with
linears, and this little amp seems too good to be true, so it

probably
is!
Anyone know where there's information online for this amp?

Thanks!


  #4   Report Post  
Old February 1st 05, 05:02 AM
Jon Lippert
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I have a chance to get a Palomar Elite 300 linear amp CHEAP! Is this
thing any good? I haven't been able to find any information on it and
it doesn't come with a manual. The questions I have a

Is this amp good for HF Freqs 10 meters down to 80 meters as the seller
claims?
What purpose does the preamp serve?
With a boost in transmitting power, how will this affect receiving?
Would I be transmitting further than I can actually receive?


Greetings! I don't believe that it will go down to 80 meters. The ones like
it that I have seen will generally go down to 40 meters. The pre amp is for
receive purposes only, and is generally the first thing to go on these type of
amps. They are made for the eleven meter crowd and that is where they do best.
I don't forsee any real change in your reception with the amp. It has a low
input of probably no more than 10 watts. What transiever are you planning on
using it with? I think its best use for you would be on ten meters with a QRP
setup. You may be able to get this one cheap, but you need to determine which
bands you would want it for and do some more homework on it first. Copper
electronics is the big seller of these things. You might be able to get some
more info there. If I were you I would save my money and get something
actually designed for amatuer radio use. Jon.
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 3rd 05, 07:49 AM
Dennis
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks, Jon. There's a lot of confusing information on the web about
FCC rules regarding amps. My understanding is that in the U.S. you
can't have a linear amp with less than 50 watts drive power? I have a
10 meter mobile rig running off a power supply at home with 10 watts AM
and I believe 25 watts SSB. The palomar does not meet these drive
rules (5-25 watts), plus I seriously doubt it was issued an FCC type
acceptance, so it would be illegal to use it. I could be wrong here,
so please correct me if I am.

So it seems I can't put ANY type of amp on my 10 meter rig because of
it's low power. I may as well pack it away until the sun cycle
improves. It's pretty useless the way things are now, but damn can it
reach out when the sun activity is favorable! (RCI-2950)

Also, I heard these black market amps are really dirty as far as
interference goes. I definitely don't need to be upsetting the
neighbors. They wonder about enough as it is. :-) I woldn't blame
anyone for using this amp for QRP, but its dirty output could really
create problems not only with the neighbors but with the FCC.

I also heard this amp is a real current hog - at least 20 amps when set
on low (it's obviously not very efficient).

So, I agree with Jon that if I were to buy a linear amp, the extra
money for a good quality, reputable brand amateur radio amp is money
well spent. Clean, efficient operation really costs, though!

Glad I posted this, as I totally forgot about the minimum drive power
rule. Doing your homework can really pay off sometimes. :-) Thanks
to all for your help and advice.



  #6   Report Post  
Old February 3rd 05, 03:26 PM
Pete KE9OA
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't think type acceptance applies to equipment applied for Amateur Radio
use.........think of all of the hams that have built thier own amplifiers.
Drive power also shouldn't be an issue..............if you have a QRP rig,
you should be allowed to design your own amplifier or use a commercial
amplifier that has low drive requirements. Using it on 11 Meters is a
different story, but the Amateur frequencies should be an exception. I don't
use the myself, instead, using a barefoot 100 watt rig on the HF bands, it
eliminates the "other box", but everybody has preferences.............

Pete

"Dennis" wrote in message
oups.com...
Thanks, Jon. There's a lot of confusing information on the web about
FCC rules regarding amps. My understanding is that in the U.S. you
can't have a linear amp with less than 50 watts drive power? I have a
10 meter mobile rig running off a power supply at home with 10 watts AM
and I believe 25 watts SSB. The palomar does not meet these drive
rules (5-25 watts), plus I seriously doubt it was issued an FCC type
acceptance, so it would be illegal to use it. I could be wrong here,
so please correct me if I am.

So it seems I can't put ANY type of amp on my 10 meter rig because of
it's low power. I may as well pack it away until the sun cycle
improves. It's pretty useless the way things are now, but damn can it
reach out when the sun activity is favorable! (RCI-2950)

Also, I heard these black market amps are really dirty as far as
interference goes. I definitely don't need to be upsetting the
neighbors. They wonder about enough as it is. :-) I woldn't blame
anyone for using this amp for QRP, but its dirty output could really
create problems not only with the neighbors but with the FCC.

I also heard this amp is a real current hog - at least 20 amps when set
on low (it's obviously not very efficient).

So, I agree with Jon that if I were to buy a linear amp, the extra
money for a good quality, reputable brand amateur radio amp is money
well spent. Clean, efficient operation really costs, though!

Glad I posted this, as I totally forgot about the minimum drive power
rule. Doing your homework can really pay off sometimes. :-) Thanks
to all for your help and advice.



  #7   Report Post  
Old February 3rd 05, 05:45 PM
Michael Black
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pete KE9OA" ) writes:
I don't think type acceptance applies to equipment applied for Amateur Radio
use.........think of all of the hams that have built thier own amplifiers.
Drive power also shouldn't be an issue..............if you have a QRP rig,
you should be allowed to design your own amplifier or use a commercial
amplifier that has low drive requirements. Using it on 11 Meters is a
different story, but the Amateur frequencies should be an exception. I don't
use the myself, instead, using a barefoot 100 watt rig on the HF bands, it
eliminates the "other box", but everybody has preferences.............

Pete

Decades ago, you'd open up the Lafayette catalog, and see amplifiers on
the CB page. They'd have relatively low output, but then they only required
5W drive. And they'd all say "Illegal for Class D citizen band use".

IN other words, they were being sold for such use, with the disclaimer
so Lafayette could at least say they warned people.

There were plenty of other examples.

So in the late seventies your FCC introduced a law to clamp down on
those amplifiers for illegal use. The issue wasn't to restrict amateurs,
the issue was that many an amplifier was using the guise of being
an amateur amplifier to cloke that it was intended for the CB market.

Michael VE2BVW

"Dennis" wrote in message
oups.com...
Thanks, Jon. There's a lot of confusing information on the web about
FCC rules regarding amps. My understanding is that in the U.S. you
can't have a linear amp with less than 50 watts drive power? I have a
10 meter mobile rig running off a power supply at home with 10 watts AM
and I believe 25 watts SSB. The palomar does not meet these drive
rules (5-25 watts), plus I seriously doubt it was issued an FCC type
acceptance, so it would be illegal to use it. I could be wrong here,
so please correct me if I am.

So it seems I can't put ANY type of amp on my 10 meter rig because of
it's low power. I may as well pack it away until the sun cycle
improves. It's pretty useless the way things are now, but damn can it
reach out when the sun activity is favorable! (RCI-2950)

Also, I heard these black market amps are really dirty as far as
interference goes. I definitely don't need to be upsetting the
neighbors. They wonder about enough as it is. :-) I woldn't blame
anyone for using this amp for QRP, but its dirty output could really
create problems not only with the neighbors but with the FCC.

I also heard this amp is a real current hog - at least 20 amps when set
on low (it's obviously not very efficient).

So, I agree with Jon that if I were to buy a linear amp, the extra
money for a good quality, reputable brand amateur radio amp is money
well spent. Clean, efficient operation really costs, though!

Glad I posted this, as I totally forgot about the minimum drive power
rule. Doing your homework can really pay off sometimes. :-) Thanks
to all for your help and advice.





  #8   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 08:46 PM
Dennis
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I realize the type acceptance applied to commercially made equipment.
However, I find it odd that a licensed amateur can build an amp that
violates the regulations the commercial builders are required to
follow. (I.E. Drive power) I'm not doubting it; just find it a little
odd. :-)

Also, if I remember correctly, a licensed amateur can build ONE RF Amp
in one calendar year. Anyone building more than one amp must apply for
an FCC grant or type acceptance. (Again, please correct me if I'm
wrong) I remember reading this in the ARRL handbook in the late 90's,
that was over five years ago so this law may have changed.

Are there any ARRL publications, especially the handbook, which contain
plans for a linear amp which will run on 5-25 watts drive power?


Chuck Harris wrote:
First, IANAL, but this is the internet, so here goes:

Type acceptance does apply to linear amplifiers commercially "made

for amateur"
use. There are requirements that the amplifier not be usable above

the 15 meter
band, and not be usable with drive levels below 50 watts. There are

also rules
about how far below carrier the spurious emissions must be. In order

for a
commercial entity to sell a linear amplifier for amateur use, in the

US, it must
be type accepted.

The Palomar Elite is a commercially built linear amplifier that was

not type
accepted. As a result, the sale of the linear amplifier in the US

was
illegal. Any use of the linear amplifier (amateur or otherwise) is

also illegal.

When Heath sold the SB220 and other linears, after the law came into

effect,
they made the amplifiers only work to 15 meters. You could buy a kit

that
would allow operation on 10 meters, but only after showing them a

valid
amateur radio license. Notice that these amplifiers were compliant

with the
FCC rules even though they were kits!

Now, for the other side of the coin: A licensed amateur radio

operator may
build and use *anything* he wants, as long as it meets the

requirements for
the service. He may also modify the radios from any service to be

usable in
the amateur radio service. So, if you have an 11 meter CB, and you

modify
it to operate on 10 meters, that is fine. If you want to build an

amplifier
that takes the 10W or so SSB from that transceiver, and boosts it to

a full
gallon, that is fine too.

The type acceptance laws only apply to the commercial manufacturer.

The
big question before the house is: can an illegally manufactured and

sold product
ever become legal to possess and use? The legal answer is probably

not,
in spite of the fact that it would be perfectly legal for an amateur

to build
such a product for his own use.

-Chuck Harris


  #9   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 09:38 PM
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dennis wrote:
I realize the type acceptance applied to commercially made equipment.
However, I find it odd that a licensed amateur can build an amp that
violates the regulations the commercial builders are required to
follow. (I.E. Drive power) I'm not doubting it; just find it a little
odd. :-)


Licensed amateurs can do all kinds of things that commercial manufacturers
cannot do! You don't have to meet a lot of the electrical safety requirements,
even.

For a long time, commercial broadcasters were also allowed to use non-type-accepted
equipment as long as it had markings on the case saying who constructed it and
when, and certifying that it met the requirements of the type. BUT, they could
not sell such a homebrew transmitter to another station for use.

Also, if I remember correctly, a licensed amateur can build ONE RF Amp
in one calendar year. Anyone building more than one amp must apply for
an FCC grant or type acceptance. (Again, please correct me if I'm
wrong) I remember reading this in the ARRL handbook in the late 90's,
that was over five years ago so this law may have changed.


I don't remember that at all but it may well be true. I recently built a receiver
which had ten RF amp modules in the IF strip. Does that violate the requirements?

Are there any ARRL publications, especially the handbook, which contain
plans for a linear amp which will run on 5-25 watts drive power?


Probably some of the older ones do. I know that QST once did a project on
an amp for the ARC-5 sets.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #10   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 10:11 PM
Michael Black
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dennis" ) writes:
I realize the type acceptance applied to commercially made equipment.
However, I find it odd that a licensed amateur can build an amp that
violates the regulations the commercial builders are required to
follow. (I.E. Drive power) I'm not doubting it; just find it a little
odd. :-)

But this is because the rules are about commercially manufactured
amplifiers, not general rules that apply to the amateur service.

Again, we are not talking about laws intended for hams. This amplifier
law is about amplifiers that are illegally used for cb or bootleggers.
The only reason it impacts on amateur radio is because there is no real
way of making an amplifier that only works on ten meters, and not at
all on adjacent frequencies.

How do restrict amplifiers that use to be labelled "illegal for Class
D Citizen Band use" even though they were on the same page as the CB sets?
Well, you can start by requiring drive power that is higher than CB
sets put out. Yes, hams can require amplifiers that use little drive, but
generally it was easy to see from the drive specs what amplifiers were
intended for illegal CB use.

Put in rules that do not allow amplifiers that cover the frequency range.
Hence the elimination of 10meter position on amplifiers intended for ham
radio.

And so on, for whatever the rules state exactly.

The rules will be a problem to some hams, but relatively few. Only a handful
will need low drive requirements. Since it's amateur radio, the individual
has a greater chance of knowing how to fix the problem of no 10meter band on
the amps. And of course, since it's amateur radio, they can always build what
they need. The rules haven't changed amateur radio, they've changed the state
of commercial amplifiers.

Also, if I remember correctly, a licensed amateur can build ONE RF Amp
in one calendar year. Anyone building more than one amp must apply for
an FCC grant or type acceptance. (Again, please correct me if I'm
wrong) I remember reading this in the ARRL handbook in the late 90's,
that was over five years ago so this law may have changed.

That's because you have to define "manufactured". If an individual can
make an amplifier and sell it, then it bypasses the issue completely,
because it still makes amplifiers available for illegal use. One amplifier
a year (and it may specifically say one of the same design), should not
be a hardship for a ham, because realistically they won't need anymore.


Are there any ARRL publications, especially the handbook, which contain
plans for a linear amp which will run on 5-25 watts drive power?



Of course they are, though who knows if they are shown as stand alone units.
After all, one has to build a linear to get low level stages up to a higher
power. And given current design, they are likely to be broadband amplifiers,
with external filtering.

If you don't see stand alone amplifiers, that's because there is little
need. Most rigs already put out more power than the 50watts or whatever.

Michael VE2BVW

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Handy Shortwave Chart William Mcfadden Info 0 November 1st 04 09:00 AM
Handy Shortwave Chart William Mcfadden Info 0 May 1st 04 09:00 AM
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications Hania Lux Equipment 0 October 22nd 03 08:48 PM
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications Hania Lux Equipment 0 October 22nd 03 08:48 PM
Handy Shortwave Chart William Mcfadden Shortwave 0 August 1st 03 08:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017