Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back from the W5E Special Event,
hosted by the Shreveport Amateur Radio Association and the Eighth Air Force Museum at Barksdale Airforce Base in North Louisiana. What a great time! We ran the SCR-287 and SCR-274N stations on Friday evening to "work the kinks out," and it's a good thing we did because there were bugs to be found. The BC-375 didn't want to neutralize properly. I didn't get that one fixed until Saturday afternoon, even though we did log some contacts on the 287 on Friday. By the "official" time on Saturday, the rig was working and sounding good again. The big scare on Friday night was the unmistakable smell of roasted resistor coming from the BC-348-R, which then crashed, stone dead. I brought plenty of spares parts and started "resuscitation" right away. This receiver had been running flawlessly for a month (as had the transmitter), but now *three* paper bypass caps failed, leaking to short. This toasted two dropping resistors, failing them *low-Z*. One 4.7 K-ohm was down to 200 ohms. The real scare was that these were in the IF plate leads, right through the hair-fine wire in the IF transformer windings. The way the receiver suddenly died, I was sure one of the IFs had gone open, but there must have been an angel watching over us, because new caps and resistors plus re-alignment brought it back from the dead. We put the rig back together, warmed it up for a couple of hours and it worked flawlessly on Saturday night into the full-wave horizontal 80-meter loop at 40 feet. *Gripe mode on* Operation during the "official" time on 3880 KC was, ummmm, "challenging." The AM ops from nearly everywhere were courteous and helpful and we're most grateful to them. Nevertheless, the QRM was vile- absolutely horrible. The biggest problem was a group down here in "5-Land" that, several years ago, decided that they were the judges of what modes can and cannot be used on 75 meters. They camp each night within 2 KCs of 3880 with the specific intent of causing as much grief as possible for any operation in the AM window. They make remarks about "ancient equipment," radios "so old that the knobs have frozen at 3880 KCs" and about AM operators who are "too old and feeble to reach up and spin their VFOs if they don't like it." These room-temperature-IQ knuckle draggers have been doing this for years. There is another SSB group that does basically the same thing on 3898, but they're not quite as nasty about it. I knew about them and that it might be a problem, but 3880 was the best of bad choices within the AM window down here on a Saturday night. I was hoping that the bad actors would give it a rest for one night for a veteran-connected special events station, but no such luck. They performed their usual antics, a couple of times even coming directly on frequency to ask long and loud if "the frequency was in use." Sheesh. To add insult to injury, at 9 PM, one hour before we were going to officially end the AM try, two "big gun" AM stations in the North East came down and plopped right on top of us, ignoring dozens of guys telling them the freq was in use. Their action effectively ended the AM event, since nobody- even locals- could get past these guys. I got the station back up after midnight and moved to the then-clear 3890 KC and logged a few more before turning in. The result of all this was that if you didn't have a really good signal, you didn't get heard. I'm very sorry, guys- I could hear dozens of stations calling, and I was able to work some of the weaker ones through persistence, but there was just no way to pull most of you more distant folks out from under the few selfish clowns who insisted on grinding their axes last night. And once those two northeast AM guys dropped on us, it was over. *Gripe mode off* Nevertheless, we did make 97 contacts with the WWII gear, including both coasts and Canada. The guys with the modern rigs worked over 300, IIRC. I've posted a picture of the WWII gear side of the operation tent on alt.binaries.pictures.radio and at: And in case the previous gave you the wrong impression, I had an absolute blast getting the old beasts running and working all of you I could hear. The SCR-274N got in some phone and CW contacts as well, but our 40-meter CW effort with the 274N was hampered by the Michigan QSO party. The rig was getting out well into a vertical and worked several states. We even had two SCR-274N-to-SCR-274N contacts, as well as one with a fellow running a T-22/ARC-5. Next time we'll try to pick a less busy weekend. SARA did a wonderful job creating this event and I'm very grateful for the chance to contribute. Lots of good publicity, too. More later- I need some shut-eye ;-). 73 DE Dave Stinson AB5S |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Stinson wrote:
The big scare on Friday night was the unmistakable smell of roasted resistor coming from the BC-348-R, which then crashed, stone dead. I brought plenty of spares parts and started "resuscitation" right away. This receiver had been running flawlessly for a month (as had the transmitter), but now *three* paper bypass caps failed, leaking to short. This toasted two dropping resistors, failing them *low-Z*. One 4.7 K-ohm was down to 200 ohms. The real scare was that these were in the IF plate leads, right through the hair-fine wire in the IF transformer windings. The way the receiver suddenly died, I was sure one of the IFs had gone open, but there must have been an angel watching over us, because new caps and resistors plus re-alignment brought it back from the dead. On the antique radio forums we make a point of driving home "replace those go***mn paper caps because they are never good". You've been around, Dave, You should know better! Since this post is only to the BA forum instead of cross-posting to rar+p I can admit that the only old radio out of dozens that I have not been compelled to wholesale recap has been an English Barker 88 which used surplus (at the time) metal cased US war-surplus caps. They all, 100%, passed any test I could give them. More often it makes sense to yank the old paper jobbies and place giant Orange Globs (for the non-restuffers) ...or in your case, assume they were ok with the resulting consequence. FB on the expedition's results.. -Bill WX4A |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Were you trying to run a net with a BC348 as your primary receiver??
The I.F. is as wide as a gorge! When the band is hot I could never use 348 without the 'Q5er.' "Bill M" wrote in message ... David Stinson wrote: The big scare on Friday night was the unmistakable smell of roasted resistor coming from the BC-348-R, which then crashed, stone dead. I brought plenty of spares parts and started "resuscitation" right away. This receiver had been running flawlessly for a month (as had the transmitter), but now *three* paper bypass caps failed, leaking to short. This toasted two dropping resistors, failing them *low-Z*. One 4.7 K-ohm was down to 200 ohms. The real scare was that these were in the IF plate leads, right through the hair-fine wire in the IF transformer windings. The way the receiver suddenly died, I was sure one of the IFs had gone open, but there must have been an angel watching over us, because new caps and resistors plus re-alignment brought it back from the dead. On the antique radio forums we make a point of driving home "replace those go***mn paper caps because they are never good". You've been around, Dave, You should know better! Since this post is only to the BA forum instead of cross-posting to rar+p I can admit that the only old radio out of dozens that I have not been compelled to wholesale recap has been an English Barker 88 which used surplus (at the time) metal cased US war-surplus caps. They all, 100%, passed any test I could give them. More often it makes sense to yank the old paper jobbies and place giant Orange Globs (for the non-restuffers) ...or in your case, assume they were ok with the resulting consequence. FB on the expedition's results.. -Bill WX4A |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill M wrote: On the antique radio forums we make a point of driving home "replace those go***mn paper caps because they are never good". You've been around, Dave, You should know better! I take your point, Bill, and I once agreed completely. I've come around to a different attitude when it concerns military radios with a historic angle. I now try to maintain the original parts if I can satisfy myself that they are serviceable. These guys were all tested and had been running without trouble for some time. Of course, they are going to fail eventually. I've just come to that point where "change as little as possible and still bring it to life" has become my stand on these rigs. I probably should have lowered the B+, as I've done with other radios, which has helped preserve their original parts, but I got cocky and overconfident on this one. It was just pure luck and the grace of God that we didn't lose an IF transformer. I could have replaced it, but it would have meant working until dawn, instead of just until 1 AM ;-). Thanks for the well-wishes. We're planning on doing another, similar event in a year or so. The museum curator, Mr. Rigg, was very enthusiastic about our efforts to preserve and operate the equipment and says he's going to "draft" me to help restore a B-24 they have. Yikes! ;-). 73 Dave S. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Albert & Btittany Spear wrote: Were you trying to run a net with a BC348 as your primary receiver?? The I.F. is as wide as a gorge! When the band is hot I could never use 348 without the 'Q5er.' I understand, but the whole point was to operate the special event with as close to an actual, authentic 8th Airforce WWII heavy bomber radio station as possible. Otherwise, it would just be a contact with a typical 1950s ham rig. So we announced on the net, on QRZ.COM, in QST and on the DX reflectors, what we were doing and asked for help. Most people did what they could to help-out and they were a godsend. Even with QRM from the few bad apples, I think we did pretty well. 73 Dave S. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Albert & Btittany Spear" ) writes: Were you trying to run a net with a BC348 as your primary receiver?? The I.F. is as wide as a gorge! When the band is hot I could never use 348 without the 'Q5er.' BUt a wide receiver bandwidth means all the transmitters do not have to be on exact frequency, something useful for net use. And back when it was a current receiver, the BC348 would be extremely useful for that. After all, transmitters were not frequency controlled with the receivers. Michael VE2BVW |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who were the Big Gun AM stations?
Mark K3MSB "David Stinson" wrote in message news:GqI8e.14705$Zn3.13207@trnddc02... Back from the W5E Special Event, hosted by the Shreveport Amateur Radio Association and the Eighth Air Force Museum at Barksdale Airforce Base in North Louisiana. What a great time! We ran the SCR-287 and SCR-274N stations on Friday evening to "work the kinks out," and it's a good thing we did because there were bugs to be found. The BC-375 didn't want to neutralize properly. I didn't get that one fixed until Saturday afternoon, even though we did log some contacts on the 287 on Friday. By the "official" time on Saturday, the rig was working and sounding good again. The big scare on Friday night was the unmistakable smell of roasted resistor coming from the BC-348-R, which then crashed, stone dead. I brought plenty of spares parts and started "resuscitation" right away. This receiver had been running flawlessly for a month (as had the transmitter), but now *three* paper bypass caps failed, leaking to short. This toasted two dropping resistors, failing them *low-Z*. One 4.7 K-ohm was down to 200 ohms. The real scare was that these were in the IF plate leads, right through the hair-fine wire in the IF transformer windings. The way the receiver suddenly died, I was sure one of the IFs had gone open, but there must have been an angel watching over us, because new caps and resistors plus re-alignment brought it back from the dead. We put the rig back together, warmed it up for a couple of hours and it worked flawlessly on Saturday night into the full-wave horizontal 80-meter loop at 40 feet. *Gripe mode on* Operation during the "official" time on 3880 KC was, ummmm, "challenging." The AM ops from nearly everywhere were courteous and helpful and we're most grateful to them. Nevertheless, the QRM was vile- absolutely horrible. The biggest problem was a group down here in "5-Land" that, several years ago, decided that they were the judges of what modes can and cannot be used on 75 meters. They camp each night within 2 KCs of 3880 with the specific intent of causing as much grief as possible for any operation in the AM window. They make remarks about "ancient equipment," radios "so old that the knobs have frozen at 3880 KCs" and about AM operators who are "too old and feeble to reach up and spin their VFOs if they don't like it." These room-temperature-IQ knuckle draggers have been doing this for years. There is another SSB group that does basically the same thing on 3898, but they're not quite as nasty about it. I knew about them and that it might be a problem, but 3880 was the best of bad choices within the AM window down here on a Saturday night. I was hoping that the bad actors would give it a rest for one night for a veteran-connected special events station, but no such luck. They performed their usual antics, a couple of times even coming directly on frequency to ask long and loud if "the frequency was in use." Sheesh. To add insult to injury, at 9 PM, one hour before we were going to officially end the AM try, two "big gun" AM stations in the North East came down and plopped right on top of us, ignoring dozens of guys telling them the freq was in use. Their action effectively ended the AM event, since nobody- even locals- could get past these guys. I got the station back up after midnight and moved to the then-clear 3890 KC and logged a few more before turning in. The result of all this was that if you didn't have a really good signal, you didn't get heard. I'm very sorry, guys- I could hear dozens of stations calling, and I was able to work some of the weaker ones through persistence, but there was just no way to pull most of you more distant folks out from under the few selfish clowns who insisted on grinding their axes last night. And once those two northeast AM guys dropped on us, it was over. *Gripe mode off* Nevertheless, we did make 97 contacts with the WWII gear, including both coasts and Canada. The guys with the modern rigs worked over 300, IIRC. I've posted a picture of the WWII gear side of the operation tent on alt.binaries.pictures.radio and at: And in case the previous gave you the wrong impression, I had an absolute blast getting the old beasts running and working all of you I could hear. The SCR-274N got in some phone and CW contacts as well, but our 40-meter CW effort with the 274N was hampered by the Michigan QSO party. The rig was getting out well into a vertical and worked several states. We even had two SCR-274N-to-SCR-274N contacts, as well as one with a fellow running a T-22/ARC-5. Next time we'll try to pick a less busy weekend. SARA did a wonderful job creating this event and I'm very grateful for the chance to contribute. Lots of good publicity, too. More later- I need some shut-eye ;-). 73 DE Dave Stinson AB5S |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark K3MSB wrote: Who were the Big Gun AM stations? I didn't write down their calls- I was too busy trying to pull just one more station out from under them and, when it became impossible, I just shut it down without getting their calls. All I remember for sure is they were W1s. 73 Dave S. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Stinson wrote: Back from the W5E Special Event, hosted by the Shreveport Amateur Radio Association and the Eighth Air Force Museum at Barksdale Airforce Base in North Louisiana. What a great time! Good goin'Dave! Great pictures of the set up too, will miss you at MRCG at SLO. Its the tenth meeting already thanks to you, Ray, and Hank for holding the first. Hey! I think your talk at the first MRCG was on the BC-375 and neutralizing the set. EdZ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
Sorry to hear that you had to deal with so much abuse from other hams. Next time, post their callsigns here. The intentional interference problem on the lowbands has gotten really bad, and maybe its time to get the FCC involved. Probabaly not, but we can hope.... Steve W6SSP |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Special Events Station, WWII Equipment, April 15-17th | Boatanchors | |||
Operation with Expired License | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
New Truck driver & CB | CB |