Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why are they so expensive? I've put off buying some for my Collins rig
because of the price. -- Regards B.H. Brian's Basement http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/6.htm Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/500.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cuz they're in demand and no longer made. Pretty simple, really.
"Brian Hill" wrote in message ... Why are they so expensive? I've put off buying some for my Collins rig because of the price. -- Regards B.H. Brian's Basement http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/6.htm Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/500.htm |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Old Guy" wrote in message news:1130290220.c4efe347713261456df1beb6517134be@m eganetnews2... Cuz they're in demand and no longer made. Pretty simple, really. They are still being made. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Old Guy" ) writes: Cuz they're in demand and no longer made. Pretty simple, really. There was a review of a recent line of Rockwell/Collins mechanical filters somewhere in the last years of "Communications Quarterly" so I suspect they are still being made. Collins mechanical filters were always costly. Surely some of it is because they aren't simple to manufacture. They also supply good performance. They were never a mass item, so there was nothing to drive cost down as demand went up. Note that commercially made crystal filters also carry a relatively high price tag. Michael VE2BVW "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... Why are they so expensive? I've put off buying some for my Collins rig because of the price. -- Regards B.H. Brian's Basement http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/6.htm Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/500.htm |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Behold, Michael Black scribed on tube chassis:
Collins mechanical filters were always costly. Surely some of it is because they aren't simple to manufacture. Heh, where's the overseas knockoffs? -- Gregg "t3h g33k" http://geek.scorpiorising.ca *Ratings are for transistors, tubes have guidelines* |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gregg wrote:
Behold, Michael Black scribed on tube chassis: Collins mechanical filters were always costly. Surely some of it is because they aren't simple to manufacture. Heh, where's the overseas knockoffs? -- Gregg "t3h g33k" http://geek.scorpiorising.ca *Ratings are for transistors, tubes have guidelines* Lafayette Radio used to sell them, but they are long gone. There wasn't enough of a market for the knock offs, either. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... Gregg wrote: Lafayette Radio used to sell them, but they are long gone. There wasn't enough of a market for the knock offs, either. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida Collins got on them regarding patent infringement issues. Pete |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gregg ) writes: Behold, Michael Black scribed on tube chassis: Collins mechanical filters were always costly. Surely some of it is because they aren't simple to manufacture. Heh, where's the overseas knockoffs? Well there were other manufacturers who made mechanical filters in the sixties. You'd see them in the Lafayette catalog, and mentioned in reviews (though I've always wondered if some of those reviews got it wrong, and they weren't mechanical filters). But they were never commmon. They were cheaper than Collins filters, but I have no idea how absolutely cheap they were for the time. I don't recall coming across real specs in the old magazines, either. I also recall in recent years that it was those other filters that used foam rubber inside, and by now much of that has deteriorated. Michael VE2BVW |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael A. Terrell" ) writes: Gregg wrote: Behold, Michael Black scribed on tube chassis: Collins mechanical filters were always costly. Surely some of it is because they aren't simple to manufacture. Heh, where's the overseas knockoffs? -- Gregg "t3h g33k" http://geek.scorpiorising.ca *Ratings are for transistors, tubes have guidelines* Lafayette Radio used to sell them, but they are long gone. There wasn't enough of a market for the knock offs, either. And of course, for a lot of things ceramic filters filled the need for a filter better than a string of IF transformers (or a single crystal in a phasing arrangement), but at low cost. You see them in most cheap am/fm radios now, where their size and cost is likely why they are used, through shortwave receivers costing hundreds of dollars, to even ham transceivers (though in that instance they tend to be used in conjunction with some sort of better filter). And the ceramic filters do cover a lot of territory, going from those three terminal ones we see in the average am/fm radio, to multiple pole filters seen in those more expensive bits of equipment. Michael VE2BVW |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() " Uncle Peter" ) writes: "Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message ... Gregg wrote: Lafayette Radio used to sell them, but they are long gone. There wasn't enough of a market for the knock offs, either. Collins got on them regarding patent infringement issues. Pete I'd never given thought to that. Was it the concept of mechanical filters that Collins had patented, or just a specific implementation? SOmeone once wrote a receiver construction article, I think it was in CQ, in the early sixties, that described how to make your own mechanical filter. Despite the number of times I've mentioned that in the newsgroups, I've yet to dig out the article. Michael VE2BVW |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: COLLINS R-390A FINAL I.F. UNIT w/ALL 4 COLLINS FILTERS! | CB | |||
AOR AR8600MkII - SSB and AM Collins Filters | Scanner | |||
FA: COLLINS Mechanical Filters | Swap | |||
FA: COLLINS Mechanical Filters | Boatanchors |