Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just repaired my TR-3, and put it on the air. I'd forgotten what a
nice rig it is. Now, I've started to think about how much better it could be. What if one was to rip out the entire frequency control section (VFO, xtal osc, mixer, etc) and replace it with a DDS synthesizer. It turns out that the display would fit in the opening of the tuning dial. There would be excellent frequency stability, no backwards tuning on 20M, 2-3 less tubes to save heat and power. It just wouldn't be a Drake anymore... And don't get me started on a lightweight switching supply to replace the AC-3. I might do that anyway, since I wouldn't be destroying any hardware. So, what do you all think? Is this a Good Idea, or a Bad Idea? Should I try to find a cruddy TR-3 and do the surgery, or am I just being silly? Your comments and critique are welcome (he says, ducking for cover.) If I should go ahead, does anyone have a TR-3 (or TR-4) that's fairly complete, but not working, they'd like to sell me as the basis of this? Call me Dr Drakenstein! Steve AB1EN |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Reinhardt" wrote in message ... So, what do you all think? Is this a Good Idea, or a Bad Idea? Depends on how much you want too do it Should I try to find a cruddy TR-3 and do the surgery, or am I just being silly? Your comments and critique are welcome (he says, ducking for cover.) First of all everyone needs a hobby for those cold winter nights when the band is not open. If I had the time and energy, I would look for a well used TR-3 and have at it. It would no longer be a Drake, but something that gives you the satisfaction of accomplishment when it is all together and working. Leanne W1WXS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leanne wrote:
"Steve Reinhardt" wrote in message ... So, what do you all think? Is this a Good Idea, or a Bad Idea? Depends on how much you want too do it Should I try to find a cruddy TR-3 and do the surgery, or am I just being silly? Your comments and critique are welcome (he says, ducking for cover.) First of all everyone needs a hobby for those cold winter nights when the band is not open. If I had the time and energy, I would look for a well used TR-3 and have at it. It would no longer be a Drake, but something that gives you the satisfaction of accomplishment when it is all together and working. Leanne W1WXS Leanne, Thanks. I'm keeping my eyes open for the right rig. I've already got an order in for the Norcal FCC-1 frequency meter. It then can bolt up to a 9850 DDS card, and provide all I need. I think. I'll certainly have extra parts for the working TR-3... Steve AB1EN |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve Reinhardt" wrote in message
... I just repaired my TR-3, and put it on the air. I'd forgotten what a nice rig it is. Now, I've started to think about how much better it could be. What if one was to rip out the entire frequency control section (VFO, xtal osc, mixer, etc) and replace it with a DDS synthesizer. It turns out that the display would fit in the opening of the tuning dial. There would be excellent frequency stability, no backwards tuning on 20M, 2-3 less tubes to save heat and power. It just wouldn't be a Drake anymore... And don't get me started on a lightweight switching supply to replace the AC-3. I might do that anyway, since I wouldn't be destroying any hardware. So, what do you all think? Is this a Good Idea, or a Bad Idea? Should I try to find a cruddy TR-3 and do the surgery, or am I just being silly? Your comments and critique are welcome (he says, ducking for cover.) If I should go ahead, does anyone have a TR-3 (or TR-4) that's fairly complete, but not working, they'd like to sell me as the basis of this? Call me Dr Drakenstein! Steve AB1EN Steve - There was a TR-3 parts rig on eBay (may still be there) that would be a starting point for such conversions. IF you want DDS, then build it outboard and use with TR-3 like the old external VFO for TR-3 was used. Remember a few point about these "conversions" Removes value (zero) of radio for anyone but you. It is rare for a "major conversions" that you described to raise the value of a radio. With your time and $$ .. go build an Elecraft K-2 .... you won't be disappointed. gb |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve Reinhardt" wrote in message
... Leanne wrote: "Steve Reinhardt" wrote in message ... So, what do you all think? An eBay seller "warzone1" is parting out a TR-3 Item number: 5824008807 You missed the TR-3 without its PTO he just sold (see completed auctions under his name). gb |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Reinhardt wrote in message ... I just repaired my TR-3, and put it on the air. I'd forgotten what a nice rig it is. Now, I've started to think about how much better it could be. What if one was to rip out the entire frequency control section (VFO, xtal osc, mixer, etc) and replace it with a DDS synthesizer. It turns out that the display would fit in the opening of the tuning dial. There would be excellent frequency stability, no backwards tuning on 20M, 2-3 less tubes to save heat and power. It just wouldn't be a Drake anymore... And don't get me started on a lightweight switching supply to replace the AC-3. I might do that anyway, since I wouldn't be destroying any hardware. ARC-5 Command Set receiver modification instructions for conversion to a single band SSB transceiver. Step 1. Remove all components except the variable capacitor... |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank wrote:
Steve Reinhardt wrote in message ... I just repaired my TR-3, and put it on the air. I'd forgotten what a nice rig it is. Now, I've started to think about how much better it could be. What if one was to rip out the entire frequency control section (VFO, xtal osc, mixer, etc) and replace it with a DDS synthesizer. It turns out that the display would fit in the opening of the tuning dial. There would be excellent frequency stability, no backwards tuning on 20M, 2-3 less tubes to save heat and power. It just wouldn't be a Drake anymore... And don't get me started on a lightweight switching supply to replace the AC-3. I might do that anyway, since I wouldn't be destroying any hardware. ARC-5 Command Set receiver modification instructions for conversion to a single band SSB transceiver. Step 1. Remove all components except the variable capacitor... Been there, done that. Well, not SSB, but my first rig (1969) was an ARC-5 conversion. I actually got to keep quite a bit of the guts and still make a few QSOs. It was paired with a Hammarlund HQ-120X... Steve AB1EN |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
gb wrote:
"Steve Reinhardt" wrote in message ... I just repaired my TR-3, and put it on the air. I'd forgotten what a nice rig it is. Now, I've started to think about how much better it could be. What if one was to rip out the entire frequency control section (VFO, xtal osc, mixer, etc) and replace it with a DDS synthesizer. It turns out that the display would fit in the opening of the tuning dial. There would be excellent frequency stability, no backwards tuning on 20M, 2-3 less tubes to save heat and power. It just wouldn't be a Drake anymore... And don't get me started on a lightweight switching supply to replace the AC-3. I might do that anyway, since I wouldn't be destroying any hardware. So, what do you all think? Is this a Good Idea, or a Bad Idea? Should I try to find a cruddy TR-3 and do the surgery, or am I just being silly? Your comments and critique are welcome (he says, ducking for cover.) If I should go ahead, does anyone have a TR-3 (or TR-4) that's fairly complete, but not working, they'd like to sell me as the basis of this? Call me Dr Drakenstein! Steve AB1EN Steve - There was a TR-3 parts rig on eBay (may still be there) that would be a starting point for such conversions. IF you want DDS, then build it outboard and use with TR-3 like the old external VFO for TR-3 was used. Remember a few point about these "conversions" Removes value (zero) of radio for anyone but you. It is rare for a "major conversions" that you described to raise the value of a radio. With your time and $$ .. go build an Elecraft K-2 .... you won't be disappointed. gb My proposal will surely result in a worthless radio, from a resales perspective. That's why I need to start with something of little worth, and why I'm reluctant to dig into mine. It's not the prettiest, but it is working and largely original. Someone already got the mike connector; it's a standard 1/4" now. Most of the rest seems faithful to the original. Still, it would be interesting to have the 300W input, and smooth AGC of this unit with modern tuning. I'll save the truly modern stuff for my R2-PRO and T2 system. The IQ-Pro DDS is almost ready... Thanks for the pointer on ebay. I'll check it out! Steve AB1EN |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Reinhardt wrote:
Thanks. I'm keeping my eyes open for the right rig. I've already got an order in for the Norcal FCC-1 frequency meter. It then can bolt up to a 9850 DDS card, and provide all I need. I think. I'll certainly have extra parts for the working TR-3... Steve AB1EN I've seen a Drake 4-line rig somewhere with a digital readout stuck in the dial window. Don't recall if it was an xcvr, rcvr or what. You might want to google around and see if that wheel has already been invented -Bill |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Reinhardt wrote in message news ![]() Frank wrote: Steve Reinhardt wrote in message ... I just repaired my TR-3, and put it on the air. I'd forgotten what a nice rig it is. Now, I've started to think about how much better it could be. What if one was to rip out the entire frequency control section (VFO, xtal osc, mixer, etc) and replace it with a DDS synthesizer. It turns out that the display would fit in the opening of the tuning dial. There would be excellent frequency stability, no backwards tuning on 20M, 2-3 less tubes to save heat and power. It just wouldn't be a Drake anymore... And don't get me started on a lightweight switching supply to replace the AC-3. I might do that anyway, since I wouldn't be destroying any hardware. ARC-5 Command Set receiver modification instructions for conversion to a single band SSB transceiver. Step 1. Remove all components except the variable capacitor... Been there, done that. Well, not SSB, but my first rig (1969) was an ARC-5 conversion. I actually got to keep quite a bit of the guts and still make a few QSOs. It was paired with a Hammarlund HQ-120X... Steve AB1EN They were fun... About twenty years ago I started a collection of ARC-5 stuff with the intentions of writing an ariticle for, perhaps, QST. I actually have a copy (in pristine condition) of a publication (first edition, first printing, April 1961) by Western Radio Amateur Magazine for conversion of a BC-453 to a complete 40 meter transceiver. It was a design by Ed Marriner, W6BLZ and Ernie Mason, W6IQY. Too bad not many Command Sets are left---few remain after all the conversions and parting out. I had a trailer full of the equipments that I eventually donated to a War Bird restoration outfit. Perhaps your TR-3 (my first real SSB rig) would be better off restored to like-new condition---there were considerably less TR-3's manufactured than Command Sets. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Read : Eton E1 Radio 'review' in 2006 Passport Word Band Radio (MORE DATA) | Shortwave | |||
The Eton 'Elite' E1 XM Radio "Genealogy" Drake SW1 > SW2 > SW8 > GS800M > E1 XM | Shortwave | |||
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver | Shortwave | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Drake Gear | Swap |