Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
PCBs are one of the most dangerous substances ever created. Oil-filled
capacitors containing PCB were made as early as the 1930s. The AR88 was a wartime set, more likely than consumer radios to contain oil-filled capacitors. There is no "safe level" of exposure to PCBs, and they do not break down in the environment. I would not risk cleaning out the old cans and putting new capacitors into them. Why not contact your local hazardous waste agency and find out how you can safely (and legally) dispose of the capacitors? This web article -- I'm sure you can find many others -- gives some history about PCBs and their health effects. http://www.foxriverwatch.com/monsanto2a_pcb_pcbs.html Just my $0.02. Phil Nelson "Bri" wrote in message ... I noticed some concern as to the possibility (let's not put it any stronger than that) of PCB's (polychlorinated biphenyls) being used in the oil filled capacitors of RCA AR88's. I have 2 such sets, one of which is weeping like a baby. I intend to replace the old capacitors with modern equivalents inside the old cans. Is it really likely to be PCB fluid? If so, how to safely drain, dispose and clean up the dripped fluid without wiping out much of Western Europe (or at least myself). Bri |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Phil.
Thanks for that, you highlight my dilemma well. I don't think many people realise that PCB's have been around for as long as they have. I only became aware of the possibility when I came across a query by P Bertini. The simple tests suggested by AndyB above look promising in this regard. B "Phil Nelson" wrote in message ... PCBs are one of the most dangerous substances ever created. Oil-filled capacitors containing PCB were made as early as the 1930s. The AR88 was a wartime set, more likely than consumer radios to contain oil-filled capacitors. There is no "safe level" of exposure to PCBs, and they do not break down in the environment. I would not risk cleaning out the old cans and putting new capacitors into them. Why not contact your local hazardous waste agency and find out how you can safely (and legally) dispose of the capacitors? This web article -- I'm sure you can find many others -- gives some history about PCBs and their health effects. http://www.foxriverwatch.com/monsanto2a_pcb_pcbs.html Just my $0.02. Phil Nelson "Bri" wrote in message ... I noticed some concern as to the possibility (let's not put it any stronger than that) of PCB's (polychlorinated biphenyls) being used in the oil filled capacitors of RCA AR88's. I have 2 such sets, one of which is weeping like a baby. I intend to replace the old capacitors with modern equivalents inside the old cans. Is it really likely to be PCB fluid? If so, how to safely drain, dispose and clean up the dripped fluid without wiping out much of Western Europe (or at least myself). Bri |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Nelson wrote:
PCBs are one of the most dangerous substances ever created. Oil-filled capacitors containing PCB were made as early as the 1930s. The AR88 was a wartime set, more likely than consumer radios to contain oil-filled capacitors. There is no "safe level" of exposure to PCBs, and they do not break down in the environment. I would not risk cleaning out the old cans and putting new capacitors into them. Why not contact your local hazardous waste agency and find out how you can safely (and legally) dispose of the capacitors? This web article -- I'm sure you can find many others -- gives some history about PCBs and their health effects. http://www.foxriverwatch.com/monsanto2a_pcb_pcbs.html It's a very interesting paper, it appears to have been written mostly to scare, and to hopefully encourage one to become an environmental activist. However, every single point you mention above about the dangers is counter to what is actually said in the article: it does biodegrade, it takes fairly large exposure to cause chloroacne, or liver problems... Did you actually read the article? -Chuck |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Harris wrote:
It's a very interesting paper, it appears to have been written mostly to scare, and to hopefully encourage one to become an environmental activist. However, every single point you mention above about the dangers is counter to what is actually said in the article: it does biodegrade, it takes fairly large exposure to cause chloroacne, or liver problems... Did you actually read the article? I am told that the real problem with PCBs is that they degrade into some very hazardous things when burned. Although, of course, they don't burn easily, which was the whole point of using them. I used to wade knee-deep into tanks of the stuff, and slather it all over transformer windings with bare hands. It turns out this is probably a bad thing, but I haven't noticed any problems yet. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bri" wrote in message ... Hi Phil. Thanks for that, you highlight my dilemma well. I don't think many people realise that PCB's have been around for as long as they have. I only became aware of the possibility when I came across a query by P Bertini. The simple tests suggested by AndyB above look promising in this regard. B Bri Check this website by EA5 amateur: http://www.jvgavila.com/ar88_2.htm He claimed the capacitors had PCB dielectric, something I've never been able to confirm. A few other restorers have claimed that the original metal capacitors were leaky enough to cause AGC and other sensitivity problems on their AR-88x receivers. I haven't worked on or restored mine as of yet, so I am neutral on the whole issue. Pete |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tackled PCB, Dioxin and Furan toxicity in some depth a while back
(bear in mind there are orders of magnitude difference of alleged toxicity between these closely related and often co-present compounds/contaminants, and again in the different sub-types of the compounds, the levels of which can only be assessed with specialist testing) and what I found was that industry will tell you they are low-grade toxicity and cite a ton of scientific study and environmentalists will tell you they are the ultimate toxin and cite an equal amount of scientific study. I certainly wouldn't disregard material just because its blatantly out to scaremonger. What about all the anti-tobacco ads telling you smoking gives you cancer - are they spinning BS just because they're out to scare you? Acute poisoning (enough to cause chloracne for example) means taking on a *gargantuan* dose of these types of compounds compared with what is reckoned to be a 'tolerable daily intake' (TDI), and the levels that cause concern to professional health bodies like the World Health Organisation are vanishingly small (single figure picograms) and it is carcinogenic, teratogenic (birth defects) and immune disorders far down the line (even in future generations who inherit damaged genes) that they are worried about, not acute exposure toxicity. Its difficult getting a decent professional opinion by looking at industry or environmentalist sourced material, as in my experience they are equally biased, but I think it is reasonable to accept the view of a body like the W.H.O, that class Dioxin like PCB's as potentially very dangerous substances (and known carcinogens) and impose such strict limits on human exposure. My area of experience was with dealing with teensy-weensy amounts of this stuff. The difference in amounts from a waste incinerator (and diffused) per year and what is *potentially* contained in a few capacitors is like comparing a hand-grenade to a small nuke in terms of concentration and yield. They could contain millions of maximum permissible lifetime doses. PCB's and the like do biodegrade but can take years to do so, all the while hanging around in your fatty tissues, doing whatever it is they are doing (or not doing, depending on your affiliations). Even taking the middle ground between the industry view and environmentalist view, the *possible* risks would put me off touching the stuff or taking any risks with it at all, but thats my personal opinion. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it's such harmless stuff, why has it been banned in the US since 1977?
http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/pcb/ To return to his original point -- why would you want to take a risk, if you can easily and cheaply avoid it? If you're concerned about authentic appearance, there were postwar metal bathtub style capacitors which are actually paper caps, not oil filled. I found some in my Scott Labs 800B, for instance. Get a junker 800B chassis and scavenge the bathtub cases to restuff, if they look right and that suits you. You can also buy new or NOS style bathtub caps in a variety of values and case styles. Alternatively, you can puncture the old case and drink what's inside, for all I care. It's a free country :-) Go in peace, Phil Nelson |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to wade knee-deep into tanks of the stuff, and slather it all over
transformer windings with bare hands. It turns out this is probably a bad thing, but I haven't noticed any problems yet. I smoked cigarettes for over 20 years, then quit. It turns out this is probably a bad thing, but I haven't noticed any problems yet . . . . Best wishes, Phil "famous last words" Nelson |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, something of a hornet's nest here - pleased you are all enjoying the
debate. My 'conclusion' thus far: 1) No one actually knows if the capacitors in question contain PCB's 2) If they do, they may or may not be hazardous even in small amounts 3) Therefo i) I will test the fluid as described in posts ii) I will treat them as hazardous material in the meantime Now where did I put my rubber suit? Bri "Phil Nelson" wrote in message ... If it's such harmless stuff, why has it been banned in the US since 1977? http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/pcb/ To return to his original point -- why would you want to take a risk, if you can easily and cheaply avoid it? If you're concerned about authentic appearance, there were postwar metal bathtub style capacitors which are actually paper caps, not oil filled. I found some in my Scott Labs 800B, for instance. Get a junker 800B chassis and scavenge the bathtub cases to restuff, if they look right and that suits you. You can also buy new or NOS style bathtub caps in a variety of values and case styles. Alternatively, you can puncture the old case and drink what's inside, for all I care. It's a free country :-) Go in peace, Phil Nelson |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|