![]() |
|
Steve Sobol wrote:
Don Forsling wrote: Welllll, your public library is not a court, either. But it _can_ make you pay your fines. How? The same way that the FCC can do it--take you to court and see how it all comes out. Of course. Guys, the FCC *can't* throw you in jail for a criminal violation if you break their rules. They *can* fine you and file a civil lawsuit against you if you don't pay. Actually, they *can*. http://www.telecomattorneys.com/analysis.html which cites provisions of the Communications Act which allow prison terms of up to two years for violations. OK, it won't be the FCC that throws you in jail. They'd gather evidence of violation of the Communications Act, tell the federal marshals where to find you, and help the federal prosecutor prosecute charges for violation of the Act. None of which is at all common. The vast majority of violators "get the message" from the civil forfeitures. I do have a *vague* recollection of a custodial sentence being imposed on someone who insisted on continuing to jam amateur radio communications after having several civil forfeitures imposed. Can't recall anyone ever being jailed for pirate broadcasting. Don't take my memory for it that it hasn't happened though. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
Mike Terry wrote:
Jan 19, 2005 The FCC has fined a Jacksonville, Florida, CBer $10,000 for transmitting without Commission authorization. The Commission released the Forfeiture Order (NOF) to Tommie Salter on December 27. The FCC says that in March 2004 its Tampa Field Office, responding to interference complaints, restricted Salter's hours of operation. The FCC lifted the quiet hours two months later, providing Salter "operated in full compliance with the Commission's rules." When interference complaints resumed, the FCC last July 15 again notified Salter it was restricting his hours of operation. The FCC NOF said a family member signed for the notice but that Salter told Commission officials he had not read it. As a result he transmitted while his operation was prohibited--between 6 AM and 11:59 PM. An August 2004 station inspection of Salter's CB station revealed that he was operating a non FCC-certificated transmitter, in violation of Part 95 rules. A Notice of Apparent Liability (NAL) proposing the $10,000 fine followed in October. The FCC's NOF upholds the fine, despite Salter's protests that his violation was not willful because he did not understand that use of non-certificated transmitters violated the rules and did not know about the reinstated quiet hours. Salter also claimed he couldn't pay the fine, but the FCC says he failed to provide tax returns or other necessary documentation to back up that claim. The FCC authorizes CB operation "by rule"--essentially a blanket license. http://www.arrl.org/ Think thats a big fine? Well a guy out here in "La La Land" who held a ham ticket only a few days before it was "set aside" has him beat by $42,000 -- so far. The latest $21,000 proposed forfeiture factors in an "upward adjustment" from the $7000 base fine for causing interference to licensed stations -- in this case the United States Coast Guard during a declared emergency. The FCC already had affirmed a $10,000 fine levied against Gerritsen last year for interfering with Amateur Radio communications. In December, the Commission proposed another $21,000 fine, citing additional instances of alleged interference on amateur frequencies. It goes as follows from the latest ARNewsline: ENFORCEMENT: ALLEGED COAST GUARD JAMMER FINED $21,000 A former ham who the FCC says jammed other communications during a declared Coast Guard emergency has been issued a rather hefty fine. And its not his first. Bruce Tennant, K6PZW, has the latest on the saga of Jack Gerritsen, the ex-KG6IRO.. -- The FCC has fined Jack Gerritsen, the ex-KG6IRO, another $21,000 for what the agency calls his willfull and malicious interfering with the radio communications of a Coast Guard Auxiliary Officer. This, while the officer attempted to use amateur frequencies to contact a sailing vessel in distress. As previosly reported here on Newsline, the episode took place back last October. Thats when Al Geiger, KG6FB, was sailing solo to Guadalupe Island on his 36 ft. sloop, following another boat which was about 20 miles ahead of him. On Tuesday night, October 26th they were caught in a bad storm. Al turned back when he lost his Jib sail in the high winds. Both his VHF marine radio and his 2 meter ham radio amplifier had failed. Without his radio, Geiger lost contact with the other boat. The jamming incident happened on the Catalina repeater on Friday morning, October 29th. The Coast Guard group in Los Angeles was interested in obtaining any information that KG6FB had about the other boat. So it had Bill Scholz, W1HIJ, who is the District Communications Officer for the Coast Guard Auxiliary, try to contact Geiger on the Catalina Repeater. The QSO between KG6FB and W1HIJ started at 10:02 AM and continued off and on through about 11:40. The person alleged to be Jack Gerritsen showed up after the traffic began and refused to clear the frequency. Luckily, a tape recorder was going and here is a small part of what happened. The first voice you hear is that of Bill Scholz, W1HIJ followed by that alleged to be former ham Jack Gerritsen. This was recorded using VOX, so any dead air is missing. -- W1HIJ: Wiskey One Hotel India Juliet, Coast Guard Auxiliary Upland Radio 1. This frequency is in use for emergency communications. This frequency in use for emergency communications. Please remain off he frequency. This is W1HIJ, Upland Radio 1 out.” Unidentified Transmission: “Yeah whats your phone number. Ive never heard any emergencies on this damn frequency. You ever heard of 911 stupid?” -- As the jamming was going on the Los Angeles FCC office was notified. Los Angeles Office agents located the source of a signal on 147.690 MHz, the input frequency to the Catalina repeater and traced it to Gerritsen’s home. At approximately 11:35 AM, the agents approached Gerritsen’s residence. After several failed attempts to gain the attention of anyone inside failed, one of the agents called Gerritsen’s residential telephone using his cellular telephone. The call was answered by someone who would not speak. The Los Angeles agent then requested a face to face interview with Gerritsen. Shortly thereafter the phone line went dead. Subsequent attempts to reach Gerritsen over the phone resulted in busy signals. At approximately 4:38 PM the agents returned to Gerritsen’s residence. As they approached the front door they heard a male voice coming from inside which synchronized with the voice heard on the agents’ handheld scanner tuned to 147.810 MHz. The voice was familiar to the agents as Gerritsen’s. No one answered the door. The agents requested information concerning Gerritsen’s involvement in a Coast Guard rescue earlier that day, and requested an inspection and an interview. There was no response to the requests. On November 3, 2004, the Commission’s Los Angeles Office received information from the President of the Catalina Amateur Radio Association. He reported that he had monitored and recorded the communications between Gerritsen and the Coast Guard Auxiliary Officer on October 29th, The recording reveals that for approximately 40 minutes, Gerritsen is speaking and playing a recorded message while the Officer asks him to cease transmissions and vacate the frequency because of the emergency. In its order issuing the proposed fine to Gerritsen, the FCC indicates that there is no doubt that he was the source of the interference, It says that on October 29, 2004, Gerritsen, clearly identifying himself by his cancelled callsign of “KG6IRO,” began transmitting on the Catalina repeater input frequency even though it had been cleared for emergency communications. It says that Gerritsen refused to clear the channel, and refused to cease transmitting while obstructing the communications of the authorized users during the emergency. This says the FCC wannants at least the base forfeiture amount of $7000. But says the FCC, Gerritsen’s refusal to clear the frequency, and his continual use of the frequency during the emergency, and his interference with a Coast Guard Auxiliary Officer’s ability to hear radio communications from the ship in distress makes this a far more egregous offense. As such, and considering the entire record in the case, the FCC concludes that Jack Gerritsen is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $21,000. For the Amateur Radio Newsline, I’m Bruce Tennant, K6PZW, in Los Angeles. -- Gerritsen already has a confirmed $10,000 fine and a Notice of Apparent Liability for another $21,000 pending against him. Adding in the latest N-A-L, that’s a total of $52,000 so far. As is normal when a Notice of Apparent Liability is issued, Gerritsen was given the customary time to pay or to file an appeal. (FCC) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com