mark the spam queen
 

wrote:
I received your email and Hope not to hear from the ARRL again

It shows indeed the odd state of affair that a new am was placed in
charge of the membership office and yet that New Ham (you) is not a
tech class op.

I was member of the ARRL some years but frankly found little benefit in
maintaining association in an Organization that fails to consider the
needs of the member of the largest class in the ARS. I had considered
possible when Carl Stevenson was standing for election to the BoD
thinking perhaps the ARRL was prepared for some debate the ending of
the affair convinced me to reconsider rejoining an organization that
paid lip service to "work from within" and yet choose to prevent
promemate member s of NCI from even standing for election from reading
QST over the year( I nearly complete set on cd going back quite some
time and find the ARRL to opposed to all changes till they happen then
of course they supported the change all along

In short while in generous moments, I am prepared to consider that ARRL
may be trying to advance what it believes to be the best interests of
the ARS , I am also convinces that these efforts are damaging to the
ARS and most esp its future

Mark Morgan KB9RQZ

who gives a **** what you send to the arrl, you stupid cocksucker

kook on parade
 

On 25 Sep 2006 20:23:39 -0700, "
wrote:


wrote:

who gives a **** what you send to the arrl, you stupid cocksucker
you cared enough to vandalism

how does one 'to vandalism'?

--

meowmix

mhm x v i x i i i

alcotrol labs r&d




NUKE FRANCE

meow