On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:27:19 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

|On Aug 8, 5:19 pm, james wrote:
| The board is not fully shielded. From the pictures I see components on
| one side. If it were fully shielded then I should not see conponents
| but some form of shielding.
| james
|
|What are you talking about?
|The components are all under a metal shield...
|The picture you see with all the components is before the shield goes
|on.
|I see you're still as sharp as a tack... lol
|Now get your glasses this time and look again...
|http://www.telstar-electronics.com/VoiceMax%20B.pdf
|www.telstar-electronics.com
|
|-----------------

I will take your word for it.

james

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:27:19 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

|On Aug 8, 5:19 pm, james wrote:
| The board is not fully shielded. From the pictures I see components on
| one side. If it were fully shielded then I should not see conponents
| but some form of shielding.
| james
|
|What are you talking about?
|The components are all under a metal shield...
|The picture you see with all the components is before the shield goes
|on.
|I see you're still as sharp as a tack... lol
|Now get your glasses this time and look again...
|http://www.telstar-electronics.com/VoiceMax%20B.pdf
|www.telstar-electronics.com
|
|------------------------

besides a well designed PCB layout and proper care in design can quite
often remove the need for shielding.

james

On Aug 9, 8:43 am, james wrote:
besides a well designed PCB layout and proper care in design can quite
often remove the need for shielding.

When you have an amplifier with 60dB of gain... and high local RF
fields... all the design and PCB layout work in the world will not
help you from instabilities... without a shield!
www.telstar-electronics.com

The main problem I see with the voicemax is that it is a fast response,
short hold time audio compressor.
CBers like their audio clipped off on their peaks so they can sound LOUD and
like ****. The more screwed up the audio is the better they like it

Now if the compressor was followed by a clipper with some clipping on the
peaks, followed by a low pass filter, it could sound LOUD without splitter.

I forgot CBers like to splitter across the band so their buddies on the
band can hear them no matter what channel their on.

like ****.

Capitalized for emphasis? :lol:

I know of two hams that have their audio cranked up so loud on
2 meter FM, that when you turn them down to a normal level, you
can't hear the reply from a normal user.

On Aug 12, 10:55 pm, "Big Joe" wrote:
The main problem I see with the voicemax is that it is a fast response,
short hold time audio compressor.
CBers like their audio clipped off on their peaks so they can sound LOUD and
like ****. The more screwed up the audio is the better they like it
Now if the compressor was followed by a clipper with some clipping on the
peaks, followed by a low pass filter, it could sound LOUD without splitter.
I forgot CBers like to splitter across the band so their buddies on the
band can hear them no matter what channel their on.

You're right... CBers as a rule sound bad. I don't think they do this
on purpose... although you'd never know that by the way they carry-
on... LOL
You're also right that a clipping type compressor makes you sound very
distorted... and should not be used for voice applications.
After all... clipping type compressors are most commonly used as an
accessory for electric guitars... where they are commonly referred to
as "fuzz boxes".
www.telstar-electronics.com

On Aug 12, 11:40 pm, Scott in Baltimore
wrote:
like ****.
Capitalized for emphasis? :lol:
I know of two hams that have their audio cranked up so loud on
2 meter FM, that when you turn them down to a normal level, you
can't hear the reply from a normal user.

True, sounding bad is not exclusive to CBers... LOL
What do you mean normal level? 50% modualtion?, 70%?, 85%?
What is the modulation of a "normal user"?
www.telstar-electronics.com

Tel star Electronics wrote:
On Aug 12, 8:17 pm, "21W2319" wrote:
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message

ups.com... On Aug 9, 8:43 am, wrote:
"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a
congress"
I think this should really read...
"one useless post is disgrace 2 become a nuisance 3 or more become a
CB NG"
INDEED!!!!!!!!!!

LOL... just having a little fun with the little kids outs here.
www.telstar-electronics.com

As one of the mugs who bought your info said "Not very informative,
don't waste your money on this brochure."

On Aug 14, 10:47 am, Steve H wrote:
As one of the mugs who bought your info said "Not very informative,
don't waste your money on this brochure."

Glad to see you're doing some research.
I guess you forgot the part about the gentleman's purchase price being
refunded... lol
Anyway, if you knew the first thing about business, you would know
that you can't please everyone all the time.
See... you learned something today... so it wasn't a total loss.
Cheers...

VoiceMax Introductory Offer in Progress...
Don't miss your chance to get one of these unique units at a great
price.
http://www.telstar-electronics.com/d...cialOffers.htm

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:25:22 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

|On Aug 9, 8:43 am, james wrote:
| besides a well designed PCB layout and proper care in design can quite
| often remove the need for shielding.
|
|When you have an amplifier with 60dB of gain... and high local RF
|fields... all the design and PCB layout work in the world will not
|help you from instabilities... without a shield!
|www.telstar-electronics.com
|---------------

If there is instabilities that often is the results of to much gain in
one stage. A m ore prudent design would be to spread the gain over
several stages to reduce instabilities of a single stage.

Also proper RF by passing and PCB layout can minimize stray pickup of
weak RF fields.

james