Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 8th 03, 03:40 PM
Bert Craig
 
Posts: n/a
Default FRS Radios vs CB

"Homac" wrote in message
om...
You are right about CB I have seen more and more people with them
again. It started in the 70s then died out, back in the late 80's
then died out and now its back again???

Homac


Happily, I can say they sure are. Particularly on channels 36 through 40 on
SSB. Nice QSOs too. (Starting to hear more "QSX and standing by," rather
than "QRT and standing by.")

--
73 de Bert
WA2SI


  #2   Report Post  
Old July 8th 03, 05:36 PM
Skipp
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just depends on how serious the user wants to be... and if they are using
radios for business and or personal communications.

Most common people trying radios don't want to even think about them, its
enough to figure out how to push the transmit button.

So the simplicity and low cost of an FRS radio is the big deal. Only the
shorter range keeps them from really becomming a lot more common place.

If you want more range, you can easily apply for a business radio license
which would give you 10 to 25 watts of power, more than enough for most
short haul direct conversations. Notice some of the latest radios are
combination FRS and GMRS Radios... drives a lot of GMRS repeater users
crazy.

*****

I have friends using CB for business... when the long path band conditions
are wacky, a mutual friend in Mexico might have to relay a message back
to the mobile which is only 15 miles from the base. Most people are not
going to even try to bother with it.

*****

FRS is popular, I can hear and talk back to a lot of users from a
2500 foot mountain top site. Put one of the silly simplex repeaters on
the air from the same mountain and watch the fun begin.

cheers
skipp
http://sonic.ucdavis.edu
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 8th 03, 11:53 PM
Leland C. Scott
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Skipp"

wrote in message
...
Notice some of the latest radios are
combination FRS and GMRS Radios... drives a lot

of GMRS repeater users
crazy.


My understanding is those so-called combo FRS-GMRS
radios don't have the required PL tone generation
circuits in them to activate repeaters. Plus they
don't have any offset capability either which is
also required to use a repeater system. And, I
could be wrong here, but I thought that the GMRS
repeaters you have to pay for access. They are not
the free and open type of repeater you commonly
find in Ham Radio V/UHF operations.


--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Saw this on a Tee-shirt:

"I am a
bomb
technician
if you see me
running
try to keep up "



  #4   Report Post  
Old July 9th 03, 11:57 PM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just a thought here. True the FRS units are a commodity (selling price near
the higher end throw-away cameras) and their range is limited, but they
don't have to contend with skip. One possibility might be MURS. With a 2
watt limit and a much more efficient antenna than the 27 MHz units, these
may make a lot of sense (especially if they get the prices down). I would
expect 5 miles between handhelds on MURS (but then, I may be ever the
optimist


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim

"Homac" wrote in message
om...
The range on the average CB even the smaller "Walkie-Talkie" style is
much better. FRS main advantage is it's much smaller size, however if
you want to communicate reliably (more than 1 mile) a CB or 2m Amateur
equipment is the way to go.

You are right about CB I have seen more and more people with them
again. It started in the 70s then died out, back in the late 80's
then died out and now its back again???

Homac


I want something which can communicate 2-3km and keep hearing how

limited FRS radios are. I know CBs are starting to come back, is the
range much better. Any help would be appreciated.

Luigi



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 7/4/03


  #5   Report Post  
Old July 10th 03, 12:41 AM
Duh
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...
Just a thought here. True the FRS units are a commodity (selling price

near
the higher end throw-away cameras) and their range is limited, but they
don't have to contend with skip. One possibility might be MURS. With a 2
watt limit and a much more efficient antenna than the 27 MHz units, these
may make a lot of sense (especially if they get the prices down). I would
expect 5 miles between handhelds on MURS (but then, I may be ever the
optimist


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim

Maybe over flat unobstructed ground (which is the optimistic way they rate
distance anyway, but who lives at Bonneville Salt Flats?), but in the real
world, usually a bit less. I have used MURS at the deer lease though, and in
wooded and slightly hilly terrain, we were getting around 2 miles at near
full quieting, with one watt and the tremendously inefficient rubber duck
antenna.




  #6   Report Post  
Old July 10th 03, 02:17 AM
Alan Lansburger
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim, do you know of any CB shops in the Massena, NY area? It don't matter
if it is in Canada.

****************
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...
Leland,

You are absolutely correct concerning the repeaters. The owners of the
repeaters monitor them too. Someone doesn't pay, they get shut off in a
hurry. When I worked in a shop, the move was up to trunking radio (800

MHz)
where the radios had a digital id and it was much easier to control

access.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.497 / Virus Database: 296 - Release Date: 7/4/03




  #7   Report Post  
Old July 13th 03, 02:28 AM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Unfortunately, no. Any chance of looking in the white (or yellow) pages on
the internet (or locally, if that is where you are)?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim


"Alan Lansburger" wrote in message
...
Jim, do you know of any CB shops in the Massena, NY area? It don't matter
if it is in Canada.




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/03


  #8   Report Post  
Old July 13th 03, 05:53 AM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, but you *can* replace that antenna! A decent (yet still relatively
small) antenna plus an increase to 2 watts would yield a considerable gain.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim


"Duh" wrote in message
. ..

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...
Just a thought here. True the FRS units are a commodity (selling price

near
the higher end throw-away cameras) and their range is limited, but they
don't have to contend with skip. One possibility might be MURS. With a

2
watt limit and a much more efficient antenna than the 27 MHz units,

these
may make a lot of sense (especially if they get the prices down). I

would
expect 5 miles between handhelds on MURS (but then, I may be ever the
optimist


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim

Maybe over flat unobstructed ground (which is the optimistic way they rate
distance anyway, but who lives at Bonneville Salt Flats?), but in the real
world, usually a bit less. I have used MURS at the deer lease though, and

in
wooded and slightly hilly terrain, we were getting around 2 miles at near
full quieting, with one watt and the tremendously inefficient rubber duck
antenna.




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/03


  #9   Report Post  
Old July 15th 03, 02:45 AM
stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message ...

My understanding is those so-called combo FRS-GMRS
radios don't have the required PL tone generation
circuits in them to activate repeaters.


Actually, there are some... but, most aren't capable of transmitting
on the repeater inputs, only the repeater outputs (this is how you end
up with 22 channels on many of these hybrid FRS/GMRS radios).

Plus they
don't have any offset capability either which is
also required to use a repeater system.


There are a few that actually do - Motorola makes one; but, one would
be much better off buying a "real" GMRS radio that didn't suffer from
the integral antenna limitation.

And, I
could be wrong here, but I thought that the GMRS
repeaters you have to pay for access. They are not
the free and open type of repeater you commonly
find in Ham Radio V/UHF operations.


That is generally true.

- Stewart
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 15th 03, 11:52 PM
stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ...
Yes, but you *can* replace that antenna! A decent (yet still relatively
small) antenna plus an increase to 2 watts would yield a considerable gain.


Also, higher quality receivers make a big difference. One never sees
specs on the packages of FRS or GMRS/FRS hybrid receivers - but most
of them have to be absolutely awful... manufacturers know that 99.9%
of their FRS FRS/GMRS hybrid customer base couldn't understand
receiver specs, even if they made them available. For most "real"
GMRS, MURS, ham, or business radios, you will easily be able to find
the specs - usually in the user's manual inside the package, or on a
on-line spec sheet at the manufacturer's web site... fact is, I'd
guess than more than half the ham Techs don't understand receiver
specs.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim


- Stewart
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MURS-OPEN
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sneaking tiny radios into North Korea Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 November 13th 04 06:02 PM
Comparison of six portable radios lsmyer Broadcasting 0 June 15th 04 02:21 AM
export cb radios I Am Not George Policy 12 March 30th 04 01:44 PM
FS MOTOROLA RADIO'S John Equipment 0 February 3rd 04 08:53 AM
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S John Equipment 0 January 19th 04 06:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017