Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... While firmly installed on Georgina's hand, Socko "George Is Innocent" wrote... No similar complaints about the voobie websites? You mean the one that refers to me as a Brummy M&S van driver... rather like Voob and George do? You know, if I did protest to that, It would be said that I protest too much. It would be assumed, by the "antis", that my protests were proof that the suggestions on the page were real. Whoever put up the site with nude george and voobsie pics is not as bad? So, they really are pictures of the infamous duo... cool. How did someone get hold of nude pictures of them? Strange how, when that site seems to be systematically working it's way through the newsgroup regulars, none of whom are whining about it, the one page you whine about is the one with "George" on it. Hey, Mr "innocent"... Methinks thou doth protest too much. BINGO!!!!!!! Landshark -- You can stand tall without standing on someone. You can be a victor without having victims. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Landshark wrote:
"Brainbuster" wrote in message ... While firmly installed on Georgina's hand, Socko "George Is Innocent" wrote... No similar complaints about the voobie websites? You mean the one that refers to me as a Brummy M&S van driver... rather like Voob and George do? You know, if I did protest to that, It would be said that I protest too much. It would be assumed, by the "antis", that my protests were proof that the suggestions on the page were real. Whoever put up the site with nude george and voobsie pics is not as bad? So, they really are pictures of the infamous duo... cool. How did someone get hold of nude pictures of them? Strange how, when that site seems to be systematically working it's way through the newsgroup regulars, none of whom are whining about it, the one page you whine about is the one with "George" on it. Hey, Mr "innocent"... Methinks thou doth protest too much. BINGO!!!!!!! So what is the moral to this story? If someone puts up a web site about you that isn't true, should you: A. Deny the accusations, and then be accused of "protesting too much", thereby lending some implied credibility to the accusers? B. Ignore it, and then have it implied that it must be true since no one ever denied it? A real catch 22 if I ever saw one. Dave "Sandbagger" |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jim wrote:
Dave Hall wrote: Landshark wrote: "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... While firmly installed on Georgina's hand, Socko "George Is Innocent" wrote... No similar complaints about the voobie websites? You mean the one that refers to me as a Brummy M&S van driver... rather like Voob and George do? You know, if I did protest to that, It would be said that I protest too much. It would be assumed, by the "antis", that my protests were proof that the suggestions on the page were real. Whoever put up the site with nude george and voobsie pics is not as bad? So, they really are pictures of the infamous duo... cool. How did someone get hold of nude pictures of them? Strange how, when that site seems to be systematically working it's way through the newsgroup regulars, none of whom are whining about it, the one page you whine about is the one with "George" on it. Hey, Mr "innocent"... Methinks thou doth protest too much. BINGO!!!!!!! So what is the moral to this story? If someone puts up a web site about you that isn't true, should you: A. Deny the accusations, and then be accused of "protesting too much", thereby lending some implied credibility to the accusers? B. Ignore it, and then have it implied that it must be true since no one ever denied it? A real catch 22 if I ever saw one. Dave "Sandbagger" C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. D. Rock on. -- GO #40 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jim wrote:
wrote: D. Rock on. opening night. j e t s Wanna bum out? Turn on A&E right now. Home videos from 9/11..ugghh. I want to go hang a _______________!! -- GO #40 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , jim wrote:
snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. ignore it. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , jim wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. In an ideal society. ignore it. Naw. It's more fun demonstrating how these nameless, gutless, spineless, spoiled little mama's boys don't have enough integrity or courage to put a name to their hate. That way, when they accuse someone else of such a thing (or something worse), it will carry no more weight than a Clinton deposition. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|