Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#103
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote in news:8058-
: From: (itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge) "Landshark" wrote in news:7h9Ac.4268$sv7.451 @newssvr27.news.prodigy.com: ****************You mean he didn't know that was a post made with Forte Agent? I thought George knew how to read headers? LMAO!!!! ******************Landshark Thats too funny, the guy you call george didnt make that claim. iamnotgeorge made that post and twisty said he was Frank. Never happened. Twist said Frank was Iamnotgeorge2004. It is the same person, his nic is iamnotgeorge his email is iamnotgeorge2004 so yes you did call him Frank. It did happen even though your to stupid to relaize who you are calling what. You stupid fuqqing assclown From: (I Am Not George) Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb So which one of you is wrong You are. is he frank, leland or is he george. Frank is Iamnotgeorge2004. Twisty is confused I told you I am not George I am Iamnotgeorge2004 but ItoldyouIamnotgeorge is not george wa3moj and Frank is not I Am Not George who is not "george" at all but is just Frank. now read closely assclowns I am not Frank I am not Frank I am not Frank I am not Frank I am not Frank I am not Frank I am not Frank I am not Frank I am not Frank pay attention steveo because I am deprograming you keyclowns from all the hynosis Twisty has given you I am not wa3moj I am not wa3moj I am not wa3moj I am not wa3moj I am not wa3moj I am not wa3moj I am not wa3moj I am not wa3moj I am not wa3moj ok one last step and your free, lol legal cb is good legal cb is good legal cb is good legal cb is good legal cb is good legal cb is good legal cb is good legal cb is good |
#104
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Gilliland" in message-id:
wrote: "itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote in message ... (I Am Not George) wrote in m: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/D...-Delmont88.jpg heheheh hehehe uhh that's cool. So is this little bro. http://www.bway.net/nambla.org/ definitely a forgery of Frank by someone who believes he is me |
#105
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the top was parallel with the ground (pointing East, if that makes a difference). Measurements were compared to the antenna straight up.......; SWR didn't change at all, and vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair. However, horizontally polarized field strength made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the lanyard. Some weak signals disappeared while others came in that weren't there before. Let the whip go back to vertical and the old signals came back while the new signals were lost. Let's see..............An antennas bent so that the tip is parallel to the ground?.............That represents an antenna that is now midway between horizontal and vertical polarization. The theoretical gain of that antenna should be equal between polarizations. When such a scenario is in place the field strength should drop to .707 of it's original. That represents a 3db loss just from this antenna being bent. Yet you stated.................................... "vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair." When testing mobile antennas a 3db loss is huge. Most all well designed efficient non bent antennas will easily beat your -3db antenna. |
#106
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#107
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ,
(gw) wrote: snip frank........twistie is a big skip talker ...didn't you know that??? he talks on channel 6......he is a big strapper........ That's the only way he can feel important -- imagining himself as a 'big man on the bowl'. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#108
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , wrote:
I just tested my 9' whip (mounted on the roo-guard of my Dodge). Tied it back so the top was parallel with the ground (pointing East, if that makes a difference). Measurements were compared to the antenna straight up.......; SWR didn't change at all, and vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair. However, horizontally polarized field strength made a huge jump to the good. Subjectively, I listened to the toilet bowl while pulling on the lanyard. Some weak signals disappeared while others came in that weren't there before. Let the whip go back to vertical and the old signals came back while the new signals were lost. Let's see..............An antennas bent so that the tip is parallel to the ground?.............That represents an antenna that is now midway between horizontal and vertical polarization. Wrong. That represents an antenna with -both- horizontal and vertical polarization. The theoretical gain of that antenna should be equal between polarizations. When such a scenario is in place the field strength should drop to .707 of it's original. That represents a 3db loss just from this antenna being bent. Wrong. The theoretical gain of the antenna for a given polarity is a function equal to the sum of the gains of equally spaced tangents along the curve of the antenna. Yet you stated.................................... "vertically polarized field strength dropped by a hair." As measured by my FSM. When testing mobile antennas a 3db loss is huge. Most all well designed efficient non bent antennas will easily beat your -3db antenna. I did not say that it dropped by 3dB. The phrase "by a hair" is not my words but the words of my spotter, and both of us generally use that phrase to describe a meter shift approximately equal to the width of the needle. And since the FSM used was only a 'relative' FSM (as opposed to a CISPR quasi-peak detector), there is no way to quantify "by a hair", nor did I attempt to do so. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#109
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) This little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell, "AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order. Oh really? I don't think I have ever typed "akc" in any of my posts until now. Results 1 - 10 of about 402 for "Sparky" "akc". (0.60 seconds)* Sorted by relevance* *Sort by date Related groups:**rec.radio.cb Very good, Twist. LOL. Hey Frank, you should use a webtv somewhere some time. You're having problems following who's who and need to understand how the thing works. Now search through each one and count how many of those occurances were quoted from another post instead of typed by me. Process of elimination serves quite nicely here. Check only those in the search that are from you which contain the term "akc". You've used the term quite regularly. Sobriety would permit return of your retainment and not have you lying and claiming otherwise. I guess you need another example of your communication deficit. In the post at the following link, notice that I did not use the term "AKC" but merely quoted the text that someone else typed: http://tinyurl.com/33r6x Since the post included the term, it will naturally be listed in any search for "AKC" with me as the author -regardless- of whether I typed it or not. Now, find some posts where I actually typed the term, and find enough of them to back up your claims that it is one of my "favorite terms" and/or that I "pioneered it". ============= http://tinyurl.com/ytcah http://tinyurl.com/2yor7 http://tinyurl.com/2sapq (Twisty cast the first stone) ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." "...but as usual, your best simpl isn;t good enough." "Athis is how proper communication wroks..." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#110
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In blh1d01c2jc37p88751sl43a8hrefoj4ku@2355323778, Lancer
wrote: snip You fooled for minute with you nic. Glad that the your results were close to the simulation. When I first started modeling I started with a loop, cut it in half, moved it down to ground level and raised the tip up. That would explain the results. Second the motion on getting Jay back here. Yeah, well, he'd probably start harping on me again for being rude. All the better. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Ideas for a home built 2meter/440 dual band base antenna | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
Need HF / Mobile Antenna Recommendation | Antenna | |||
Wanted: SWAN Mobile Antenna Info | Antenna |