RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   CB (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/)
-   -   Oops, someone needs a firewall......... (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/70131-oops-someone-needs-firewall.html)

[email protected] name May 4th 05 08:01 PM

Typical Twistedhed BS. Not a single, documented fact to back up his claims.


From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
"John Smith" wrote in
:
I said "I am not a lawyer", at this point, if it were me, I'd be
consulting one....
John

John he is no lawyer either thats why his


advise sucks wind.


No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to
talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes
stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think
about such things.

6 W. Gay St., Suite 311, Columbus, OH 43215
614-221-1255 PHONE | 888-622-9315


TOLL-FREE | 614-221-6357 FAX |


www.actionohio.org

OHIO LAW


Menacing by Stalking


"No person by engaging in a pattern of


conduct shall knowingly cause another to


believe


that the offender will cause physical harm to


the other person or cause mental distress to


the


other person."



Daaaamn,,,,Dogie is guilty fo this not with one person not with two
people here, but with a boatload.

"Pattern of conduct" is defined as "two or more
actions or incidents closely related in time,


whether or not there has been a prior


.conviction based on any of those actions or


.incidents.




The "actions' you speak of were initiated and perpetuated by Dogie. He
could not sue one for behaviors he initiated and committed countless
times against others.

The law has been amended to expand the


definition of "pattern of conduct" to include


cyberstalking (e.g. such as sending


.threatening messages, posting such


messages on a


computer bulletin board, using a computer


.bulletin board or listserv to induce a third


person



Just what did you consider the threats Dogie posted? Oh, that's right,
you claim you can't be sure it's him, but you can be sure it's
Mopar..lol.


to engage in stalking conduct against the


victim, or using the Global Positioning System


to


track the whereabouts of the victim).


Actions or incidents that prevent, obstruct, or


delay the performance by a public official,


firefighter, rescuer, emergency medical


services person, or emergency facility person


of any


authorized act within the public official's,


firefighter's, rescuer's emergency medical


services


person's, or emergency facility person's official
capacity may constitute a 'pattern of


conduct.'"





Yep,,,once could certainly argue that jamming a repeater as Dogie did
constitutes the prevention, delay or obstruction of possible
emergencies.

"Physical harm" is defined as "any injury,


illness, or other physiological impairment,


regardless of its gravity or duration."



Yea,,this goes with the word "tangible" you can't comprehend.

"Mental distress" is defined as "any mental


illness or condition that involves some


temporary substantial incapacity or any mental
illness or condition that would normally


require psychiatric treatment, psychological


treatment, or other mental health services


whether or not any person requested or


received psychiatric treatment, psychological


treatment, or other mental health services."




Yet, Dogie received mandatory court ordered treatment for his mental
instability resulting in crimes against children and the state.

The law prohibits stalking or harassing


someone repeatedly through electronic


means, such


as by e-mail,



Cool,,,,I knew I saved all the threats he made for a reason.

web chat room, or message board.



Those too.

Posting false information on the Internet to


cause another person to stalk an individual is


.also illegal.



LOL,,,,y'all should be shaking in your fairie boots right about now with
such an overwhelming amount of evidence against Dogie.

(The Ohio Domestic Violence Benchbook - A


Practical Guide to Competence for Judges &


Magistrates,


Second


Edition, Family Violence Prevention Center,


Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services.)


Now,,if only you could cite a single source that claims "law" as a
definition of "tangible"...LMFAO!



I AmnotGeorgeBush May 4th 05 11:54 PM

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:427-4278F4CB-25
@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
Just what did you consider the threats Dogie posted? Oh, that's right,
you claim you can't be sure it's him, but you can be sure it's
Mopar..lol.
Listen real close assjuice,



Keep your mother's bodily fluids out of the topic and you'll do fine.

moped has pictures of someones house he


went to that is a known fact,



Fact #1..he was invited there.
Fact#2...it is not illegal to take pictures. See paparazzi.

the persons house he went to may not have


made those posts.


Fact #3..the person who took those pictures may not be Moparholic.
Fact #4..the person who posted those pics may no be moparholic.

That is also fact,



Nope. Your useof the term "may" excludes it from being a fact. A fact is
certain, you are not.

now go wash off


Yes, you may now go wash off or whatever it is you do after the behavior
that has you preoccupied with
the term 'ass' and a penchant for speaking of bodily fluids when
speaking to other men.




I AmnotGeorgeBush May 4th 05 11:57 PM

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
You have no clue if this person is actually n8


because if your evidance is the same as when
you say i am wa3moj you guys are in a world


of hurt.


See what you can be taught by cbers when they tell you those you libel
on the web could have set you up like a bowling pin. Again, your posts
continue to reinforce just who has a clue. You've been a flaming failure
for years on this group.


Steveo May 5th 05 01:53 AM

(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From:
pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
"John Smith" wrote in
:
I said "I am not a lawyer", at this point, if it were me, I'd be
consulting one....
John

John he is no lawyer either thats why his


advise sucks wind.


No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to
talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes
stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think
about such things.

Nad and dogie are all up in arms now, Twist. They thought they could
run their pie-holes behind a keyboard without consequence.

When the buzzards start circling they run to the law. This ain't
the first time Ive seen a dogie who's bark is -much- bigger than
his bite.

He won't be at the convention either.

Steveo May 5th 05 01:59 AM

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:427-4278F4CB-25
@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:

Just what did you consider the threats Dogie posted? Oh, that's right,
you claim you can't be sure it's him, but you can be sure it's
Mopar..lol.


Listen real close assjuice, moped has pictures of someones house he went
to that is a known fact, the persons house he went to may not have made
those posts. That is also fact, now go wash off.

The new pope might not be catholic too. You haven't seen all the emails
with his addy on them yet either, chrissy. Disgusting **** man.

Steveo May 5th 05 02:01 AM

(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From:
pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:427-4278F4CB-25
@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
Just what did you consider the threats Dogie posted? Oh, that's right,
you claim you can't be sure it's him, but you can be sure it's
Mopar..lol.
Listen real close assjuice,


Keep your mother's bodily fluids out of the topic and you'll do fine.

moped has pictures of someones house he


went to that is a known fact,


Fact #1..he was invited there.
Fact#2...it is not illegal to take pictures. See paparazzi.

the persons house he went to may not have


made those posts.


Fact #3..the person who took those pictures may not be Moparholic.
Fact #4..the person who posted those pics may no be moparholic.

That is also fact,


Nope. Your useof the term "may" excludes it from being a fact. A fact is
certain, you are not.

now go wash off


Yes, you may now go wash off or whatever it is you do after the behavior
that has you preoccupied with
the term 'ass' and a penchant for speaking of bodily fluids when
speaking to other men.

Chrissy sees the same buzzards. The 'another keyboard coward' club (AKC)
is all up in arms now. hehehe

[email protected] name May 5th 05 05:29 AM

(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From:
pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
"John Smith" wrote in
:
I said "I am not a lawyer", at this point, if it were me, I'd be
consulting one....
John

John he is no lawyer either thats why his


advise sucks wind.


No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to
talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes
stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think
about such things.

Nad and dogie are all up in arms now, Twist. They thought they could
run their pie-holes behind a keyboard without consequence.


What "consequence"? Digital photos? LOL


mopathetic is scared of the AKC May 5th 05 03:37 PM


IAmnotGeorgeBush (bka twitlips)meweled:
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in

news:427-4278F4CB-25
@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
Just what did you consider the threats Dogie posted? Oh, that's

right,
you claim you can't be sure it's him, but you can be sure it's
Mopar..lol.
Listen real close assjuice,

twitlips is retarded, he can't listen to anything but his lusts.

Keep your FUGGLY's bodily fluids out of your mouth and you'll do fine,
twitlips.

mopathetic has pictures of someones house he


went to that is a known fact,



Fact #1..he was invited there.


He got told what would happen if he stepped in the door. You and FUGGLY
just want him so much you will say anything to hump his leg.

Fact#2...it is not illegal to take pictures. See paparazzi.

Nobody cares.

the persons house he went to may not have


made those posts.


Fact #3..the person who took those pictures may not be Mopathetic.
Fact #4..the person who posted those pics may no be mopathetic.

Baloney, he has publicly admitted it. Of course, if the main thesis is
that he is a slimy lying garbage sack, then your words make sense. You
and FUGGLY musta wore Dweebo out, now you are slobbering over
mopathetic.

This whole deal is twithed's way of trying to deflect light from the
fact that his boyfriend mopathetic won't say where he is camping at
Dayton. Either it is cuz mopathetic is scared of the AKC, or they are
both afraid the AKC will do some photo work of their own and catch them
and FUGGLY in an intimate moment. Six one, 1/2 dozen of other...no
biggie. Likely it is both.


mopathetic is scared of the AKC May 5th 05 03:40 PM

so where are you camping, limpwrist? And OH YESSSS...the AKC will be at
Dayton. Absolutely.

Where are you camping? If Uhl tell us we will come introduce ourselves.
Your lies can't change that.


mopathetic is scared of the AKC May 5th 05 03:40 PM

Yeah, mopathetic has to take pictures...he aint too good at text.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com