Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
.com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snip I served. You didn't. That's a fact. I served. Honorably. Prove it. Done already. That you wuss out on following up on the public resources provided is not my problem. Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did- serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't work now. You didn't. THAT is a fact. That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate. Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post your Honorable Discharge certificate. Sorry, Frankie...Any punk that can "brag" about two and a half promotions to Lance Corporal in ONE tour did not serve honorably. Again, that's your OPINION, and it's only YOUR opinion. And you're still a wuss for not following the resources you claim you know so well to verify my service. As I have said before (several times), you have just as many resources at your disposal as I do. And I can't find anything that verifies your alleged service. That you insinuate such a buddy-buddy relationship with Oliver North I never said I had any such relationship. You tried that tactic before. It didn't work then and it won't work now. yet can't seem to find a copy of the SNCO boards in back copies of Navy Times pretty well sets you up as the liar I claim you to be. Again. And again, I have no doubt that there was a Steven J. Robeson who served in the USMC for about 18 years. I also have no doubt, and I formally concede, that his name appears in the publications you cite. But once again, you have provide no proof that you are him. Your inability to comprehend such a simple concept is remarkable in that it demonstrates desperation in your evasiveness, as well as utter stupidity for thinking that anyone would actually believe such crap. Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ I'm getting tired of your old excuses -- got any new ones? Oh yeah..... who's your lawyer, Dud? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in . com: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns His "Feeble Five" Crown an old friend wrote: seems not Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to have defied common sense. Hence your familiarity with the phrase. But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself. Steve, K4YZ Who's your lawyer, Dud? Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?! Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time. Imaginary? His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an aparition. Why do you bring his wife and her sleeping habits into the fray? Do you think it's appropriate? It'll be interesting to see how well you do in court once he see's that you brought his wife into this. As I said...seems you are enjoying getting slapped around with your own stupidity. Speaking about stupidity... And you have a lot to spread around... Steve, K4YZ Yep, you sure spread it on thick. Talking about your attorney's wife in a forum like this? You just needed to show everyone how tight you're in with your new Upper Peninsula attorney and his wife, didn't ja? Always needing time with other people's wives, I see. So Steve, who's your attorney? |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lancer" wrote in message
news:8mset1dpm1ifovoqdaqp8rdvkno0t6u4s2@2355323778 ... There was a Steven J. Robeson, that was in charge of burning cans of ****. Could he be the same one? See how the government wastes our resources. There are countries wishing they had cans of **** and here we are burning it. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in .com: snip I served. You didn't. That's a fact. I served. Honorably. Prove it. Done already. That you wuss out on following up on the public resources provided is not my problem. Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did- serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't work now. It doesn't matter what YOU think. Oh...BTW...There was a pictorial article in the MAG-16 newspaper in 1988 for one of my CG Certificate's of Commendation for lifesaving...A Lance Corporal put his arm through a window and I managed to keep him from bleeding to death. You're welcome to find your OWN excuse as for how it happens to be the same "Steven J Robeson" that appears on my AOL and QRZ sites, Frankie. You didn't. THAT is a fact. That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate. Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post your Honorable Discharge certificate. Sorry, Frankie...Any punk that can "brag" about two and a half promotions to Lance Corporal in ONE tour did not serve honorably. Again, that's your OPINION, and it's only YOUR opinion. Obviously not. They wouldn't let you stay in the Corps. (Here comes FRANKIE'S excuses now...He's always alleging OTHERS have "excuses...Let's see his...) And you're still a wuss for not following the resources you claim you know so well to verify my service. As I have said before (several times), you have just as many resources at your disposal as I do. And I can't find anything that verifies your alleged service. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight............. .................................... That you insinuate such a buddy-buddy relationship with Oliver North I never said I had any such relationship. You tried that tactic before. It didn't work then and it won't work now. Sure you did. Why do you set yourself up as a li....Oh...wait...You already ARE a liar... Never mind. yet can't seem to find a copy of the SNCO boards in back copies of Navy Times pretty well sets you up as the liar I claim you to be. Again. And again, I have no doubt that there was a Steven J. Robeson who served in the USMC for about 18 years. I also have no doubt, and I formally concede, that his name appears in the publications you cite. But once again, you have provide no proof that you are him. Your inability to comprehend such a simple concept is remarkable in that it demonstrates desperation in your evasiveness, as well as utter stupidity for thinking that anyone would actually believe such crap. I understand fine. You make excuses then whine about people making excuses. I have no doubt that it was that whining that helped seal your fate in the Corps. I'm getting tired of your old excuses -- got any new ones? I don't need "excuses", Frankie. I have facts. That you try to pooh-pooh them off is YOUR "excuse". And, like you, a poor excuse it is, too. Steve, K4YZ |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in cut Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did- serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't work now. It doesn't matter what YOU think. obviously you care very much |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jan 2006 07:27:25 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
.com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in .com: Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in .com: snip I served. You didn't. That's a fact. I served. Honorably. Prove it. Done already. That you wuss out on following up on the public resources provided is not my problem. Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did- serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't work now. It doesn't matter what YOU think. Yet you are compelled to reply to my posts. Quite the paradox, Dud. Oh...BTW...There was a pictorial article in the MAG-16 newspaper in 1988 for one of my CG Certificate's of Commendation for lifesaving...A Lance Corporal put his arm through a window and I managed to keep him from bleeding to death. Gee, let me stroll on down to 7-11 and see if they have it on the rack..... You're welcome to find your OWN excuse as for how it happens to be the same "Steven J Robeson" that appears on my AOL and QRZ sites, Frankie. You make more than enough excuses for your ignorance about your alleged MOS and lack of any proof of your alleged service. You didn't. THAT is a fact. That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate. Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post your Honorable Discharge certificate. Sorry, Frankie...Any punk that can "brag" about two and a half promotions to Lance Corporal in ONE tour did not serve honorably. Again, that's your OPINION, and it's only YOUR opinion. Obviously not. They wouldn't let you stay in the Corps. (Here comes FRANKIE'S excuses now...He's always alleging OTHERS have "excuses...Let's see his...) Excuse for what? Your ignorance about the information on a DD-214 (after you claimed to have several of them)? And you're still a wuss for not following the resources you claim you know so well to verify my service. As I have said before (several times), you have just as many resources at your disposal as I do. And I can't find anything that verifies your alleged service. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight............ ..................................... Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeft.......... Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiight.......... Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeft.......... Quick-time, harch! That you insinuate such a buddy-buddy relationship with Oliver North I never said I had any such relationship. You tried that tactic before. It didn't work then and it won't work now. Sure you did. We've been through this before, Dud. Your excuse -then- was that I "implied" such a relationship existed, yet you never did respond to my reply where I quoted my own post on the subject. Maybe your ISP sucks and you didn't get the post -- shall I post it again? Why do you set yourself up as a li....Oh...wait...You already ARE a liar... Never mind. yet can't seem to find a copy of the SNCO boards in back copies of Navy Times pretty well sets you up as the liar I claim you to be. Again. And again, I have no doubt that there was a Steven J. Robeson who served in the USMC for about 18 years. I also have no doubt, and I formally concede, that his name appears in the publications you cite. But once again, you have provide no proof that you are him. Your inability to comprehend such a simple concept is remarkable in that it demonstrates desperation in your evasiveness, as well as utter stupidity for thinking that anyone would actually believe such crap. I understand fine. Yet you obfuscate the issue as follows: You make excuses then whine about people making excuses. I have no doubt that it was that whining that helped seal your fate in the Corps. Obviously you -don't- understand. I'm getting tired of your old excuses -- got any new ones? I don't need "excuses", Frankie. I have facts. Where? That you try to pooh-pooh them off is YOUR "excuse". And, like you, a poor excuse it is, too. My only "excuse" is that your "facts" can't be verified. Feel free to spin that any way you want. Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ Who's your lawyer, Dud? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 9:09 am On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in Frankie of Silliland wrote: On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Who's your lawyer, Dud? Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?! Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time. Imaginary? His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an aparition. "apparition" Ghoul friend? :-) He'll be ****ed when he sees that his newest client is discussing his new wife and her sleeping habits on the web. Hi! Steve really is stupid. Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the FACT that you were AGAIN wrong. Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that you never served at all. But WAIT a minute... YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the service...?!?! Seems you're very confused. Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and so was your response. If Dud's response was any more outraged, he would have to outsource the outrage to handle it all... :-) May I suggest India? Their post-docs do "outraged" better than anyone I've ever seen. Most liars of your character are, though. And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of military matters as you, NOT factual. Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system. The only "KY" that Dud knows is a jelly... Steve always forgets; the powder goes inside the glove, the KY goes on the outside of the glove. It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never fail to amuse. Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie... Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very existence. They DO threaten his imaginary existance! :-) Dudly has been living his USMC LIE so long that he MUST keep up the pretense in order to (in his world) "save face." I saw an article in the USA Today last week about a former USMC lance corporal who has been telling folks he was a Colonel for about 50 years. So he was asked to speak at an engagement, and someone there began to question this guy's credentials. Now he's faced with 5 years of imprisonment and $10,000 fine. And I'm still curious about Robeson's seven (7) hostile actions. When and where for starters. No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it. I served. You didn't. That's a fact. All that Dudly produces for "proof of his active-duty service" is a lot of blustery name-calling of his challengers. He hopes to keep all thinking about his "lying challengers" in order to weasel out of producing any tangible proof. His DD-214 copy is nowhere to be seen. Anything in the way of photographs of 18 years of "service" is nowhere to be seen. Anything in the way of other documentation of those 18 years of "service" is nowhere to be seen. Steve was probably one of those "Nowhere to be seen" soldiers who always was someplace else when the going got tuff. I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own stupidity by now... "Stupidity?" Not really. A check of USMC units shows which ones are the Reserves and which are the Active-duty. Dudly wasn't in any named Active-duty unit. Nowhere to be seen. Who's your lawyer, Dud? He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-) Yet Steve seems to know who a newlywed attorneys wife is sleeping with. Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes? Dudly keeps on insulting those who challenge his truthfulness. He offers NO proof, only those personal insults. He lost credibility in here years ago...but the "CW" Extras in here all condone his activity. Who woulda thought it? Welp, I recall Jim Miccolis asking him why he keept replying to you, and more recently Jim Hampton asked him to refrain from posting. All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with his despicable claims. Then he needs to refrain from grossly off topic stuff such as who Mark sleeps with or who his new attorney's wife is sleeping with, dialing..., rocks through , slashed tires, and terrorized wives, homosexuality, pedophilia, and outrageous claims of what a macho marine he was (if he ever was a marine). How you been, Len? bb |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|