Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:14:46 -0500, James wrote: I'm trying to decide whether I need to improve my antenna ground by adding a dynaplate (costly and requies the boat to be taken from the water for installation) or whether the range I am getting is decent. __________________________________________________ _______ I'd say your system is working pretty well. 50 feet is too long for a 20 meter antenna, however. Your auto tuner is correcting for it, but a shorter length will actually work better, since the auto tuner won't have to introduce as much correction and therefore will have lower loss in the tuner itself. The vertical part of a ground plane antenna (which is what you have) can be determined by the formula Feet=234/Freq, or for 14.3 MHz, 16.4 feet (rounded off). The exact footage depends on variables in the immediate environment, but that should be close enough. If you have to have a 50 foot overall wire because of the height of the boat's mast, just put an egg insulator at the 16.4 foot length to break it up. For multiple bands, figure the length of each section and put egg insulators where needed, and then to change bands, just connect a jumper wire across various eggs to get the correct length. Neat, huh? :-) Exactly what I was going to suggest. This will be easy to do if you have a pully on the top end so you can easily drop the wire to change the shorting straps. With the 50 foot wire, I would be concerned about getting high angle radiation on 10/15/20 metters. Dog bone insulators might put less capacitive loading on the top of the disconnected section. Tam/WB2TT Also, you can't have too much ground area, within reason. More aluminum foil or copper is always better. If you have access to an SWR analyzer such as the MFJ 259, so much the better. They are highly recommended for making and troubleshooting antennas. -- 73, Bill W6WRT |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Turner wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 06:35:49 GMT, 'Doc wrote: Will it be the 'best' possible antenna? Of course not, but it'll certainly be adequate... 'Doc __________________________________________________ _______ More cost, less performance. Amazes me what some people think is "adequate". I'd lose the tuner and spend the money on more goodies for the boat. Oh, well. -- Bill W6WRT How about adequate performance and convenience? Ever been aboard an ocean going sail boat when the waves hit 5 meters and the wind is howling like a freight train? If not you can't imagine the fury. I've been there. It's exhilirating but not easy to endure. In fact it's damned hard work. That is NOT the time to be playing with knobs and switches trying to tune for a particular band. Believe me, I will have more imporant things to do. But I do want to know that I can tranmsit immediately if something terrible happens by just keying the mic. No fuss. No offence but I've always been intrigued watching amateur enthusiasts wiggling knobs and waggling switches. Reminds me of a scene from the wizard of oz for some reason. Seems so unnecessary in this day and age. CONVENIENCE is a VERY good a reason as any to use a tuner. And they're not all that costly either. A few hundred bucks at best. Just my 2 cents worth. Jimmy |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Turner wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 06:35:49 GMT, 'Doc wrote: Will it be the 'best' possible antenna? Of course not, but it'll certainly be adequate... 'Doc __________________________________________________ _______ More cost, less performance. Amazes me what some people think is "adequate". I'd lose the tuner and spend the money on more goodies for the boat. Oh, well. -- Bill W6WRT How about adequate performance and convenience? Ever been aboard an ocean going sail boat when the waves hit 5 meters and the wind is howling like a freight train? If not you can't imagine the fury. I've been there. It's exhilirating but not easy to endure. In fact it's damned hard work. That is NOT the time to be playing with knobs and switches trying to tune for a particular band. Believe me, I will have more imporant things to do. But I do want to know that I can tranmsit immediately if something terrible happens by just keying the mic. No fuss. No offence but I've always been intrigued watching amateur enthusiasts wiggling knobs and waggling switches. Reminds me of a scene from the wizard of oz for some reason. Seems so unnecessary in this day and age. CONVENIENCE is a VERY good a reason as any to use a tuner. And they're not all that costly either. A few hundred bucks at best. Just my 2 cents worth. Jimmy |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill Turner wrote: If you're a purist, a simple L-network at the base will transform whatever impedance you have to exactly 50 ohms. L-networks of this type are quite broadbanded and one setting will usually cover the whole band. Tuners, begone! :-) -- Bill W6WRT In what world does an "L network" not equal exactly what a tuner does for a wire antenna? An autotuner is nothing more than a binary incremented L Network with autofeedback of directional power, and phase. You suggestion is the same thing with no feedback or incremental changes. Me |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bill Turner wrote: If you're a purist, a simple L-network at the base will transform whatever impedance you have to exactly 50 ohms. L-networks of this type are quite broadbanded and one setting will usually cover the whole band. Tuners, begone! :-) -- Bill W6WRT In what world does an "L network" not equal exactly what a tuner does for a wire antenna? An autotuner is nothing more than a binary incremented L Network with autofeedback of directional power, and phase. You suggestion is the same thing with no feedback or incremental changes. Me |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
James wrote: Thanks for the feedback folks. Doc is on the right track. THe tuner works really well (way to go SGC, nice product!) and the antenna length doesn't seem to be impeding transmission distance. Furthermore, the length, although not electrically correct for all frequencies, is convenient physically for a sail boat. Glad to hear that the 1000 mile distance I attained was acceptable performance. My actual planned use is for keeping in touch with other vessels (friends) that are within a couple of thousand miles tops. Hopefully it will do the trick. Thanks for the feedback folks. Muuch appreciated. Jimmy With a 50' antenna length and an adiquate RF Ground, one could consider that a respectable Marine Radio Installation. One thing that needs to be understood is that ALL Autotuners have a REALLY BIG difficency that is inherent in their design. They can NOT tune wires at the Half Wavelength point and 50Khz on each side. At this point antenna impedance becomes Infinite and can't be tuned. so a boater must make sure that he never intends to transmit on the frequency that is at the electrical Half Wavelength of the antenna. He may need to lengthen ot shorten the wire to adjust for this condition. Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
James wrote: Thanks for the feedback folks. Doc is on the right track. THe tuner works really well (way to go SGC, nice product!) and the antenna length doesn't seem to be impeding transmission distance. Furthermore, the length, although not electrically correct for all frequencies, is convenient physically for a sail boat. Glad to hear that the 1000 mile distance I attained was acceptable performance. My actual planned use is for keeping in touch with other vessels (friends) that are within a couple of thousand miles tops. Hopefully it will do the trick. Thanks for the feedback folks. Muuch appreciated. Jimmy With a 50' antenna length and an adiquate RF Ground, one could consider that a respectable Marine Radio Installation. One thing that needs to be understood is that ALL Autotuners have a REALLY BIG difficency that is inherent in their design. They can NOT tune wires at the Half Wavelength point and 50Khz on each side. At this point antenna impedance becomes Infinite and can't be tuned. so a boater must make sure that he never intends to transmit on the frequency that is at the electrical Half Wavelength of the antenna. He may need to lengthen ot shorten the wire to adjust for this condition. Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:14:46 -0500, James
wrote: Can anyone comment? Hi James, Well, as to the DX range, that has been responded to. So, to add to all the comments in regard to height of antenna, tuners, automatic tuners and the rest - another comment. Take a fishing reel full of the Wireman's Flex weave (no doubt this will provoke comments about wire corrosion) and drive it. Use your hoist to pull out the correct height for any band. I do take note of your admonition about fumbling with knobs, dials, switches when a rogue wave is overtaking you. Your knottage may vary. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:14:46 -0500, James
wrote: Can anyone comment? Hi James, Well, as to the DX range, that has been responded to. So, to add to all the comments in regard to height of antenna, tuners, automatic tuners and the rest - another comment. Take a fishing reel full of the Wireman's Flex weave (no doubt this will provoke comments about wire corrosion) and drive it. Use your hoist to pull out the correct height for any band. I do take note of your admonition about fumbling with knobs, dials, switches when a rogue wave is overtaking you. Your knottage may vary. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Turner wrote:
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:51:01 -0500, James wrote: Ever been aboard an ocean going sail boat when the waves hit 5 meters and the wind is howling like a freight train? If not you can't imagine the fury. I've been there. It's exhilirating but not easy to endure. In fact it's damned hard work. That is NOT the time to be playing with knobs and switches trying to tune for a particular band. __________________________________________________ _______ Your point is well taken, but this is also NOT the time for equipment failure. If that nifty tuner gets dunked with a dollop of salt water, you are dead, RF wise. The KISS principle is your friend. Anyone who can do a sail change or heave to in 5 meter waves can clip or unclip a jumper, or better yet, will have the jumper set beforehand. To each his own. -- Bill W6WRT Thanks for the words of wisdom Bill. In fact I made a point of purchasing a tuner that comes in a water tight (read that water PROOF according to the manfacturer) case. It's high up mounted in a lazerette that "theoretically" stays dry. The ground and antenna stud are both 316 Stainless (highly corrosion resistant and intended for use in salt air). Furthermore, the electrical connection between antenna stud and wire is soldered, crimped, and then heat shrunk with adhesive lined shrink. Instead of using high tension wire for the antenna connection to the backstay wire, I used tinned copper heavy gauge insulated electrical wire. The environment that I live in is so corrosive that, believe it or not I had to strip back the jacket to expose the tinned copper wire, and then seal the cut edge of the jacket to prevent salt water ingress between jacket and wire. If that isn't done even tinned copper wire will corrode. Salt water will creep under the jacket and corrosion will occur for a few feet distance from the stripped jacket. All connections (RF, power and control) between tuner and radio are made with crimp and solder, then sealed with liquid electrical tape, then adhesive lined heat shrink. I bought really big insulators to go at both ends of the wire antenna too. Salt water is conductive and the larger insulator with heavy ribbing will hopefully reduce the surface coating of salty water to a level that precludes conductivity. Hopefully. the copper wire I ran up the mast is on it's own pulley (well it will be when I find time to go up the mast) and is already a lovely shade of green. I have a spare, and hope this one lasts a year before needing replacement. Even so, I expect to have to service the connections about once a year or so. And you thought putting a beam on a tower was hard! Just thought you'd find the lengths we have to go to in the ocean environment interesting. The KISS principle is followed where ever I can too. I sincerely agree. When things go badly on board, it's rarely one big bad thing that bites ya. It's a string of small problems that...when combined, lead to a bad day. I guess that's true in a lot of endeavors come to think of it. Last time I was in a bad storm (a really bad one at that) I was on the radio seeking information from someone else who had radar (I do not). My autohelm had failed (a lousy 25 cent pin broke) and so I had to hand steer in heavy seas. I couldn't leave the wheel. Fortunately the mic on my marine VHF radio ~just~ reached the wheel from inside. Unfortunately that is when I discovered that if I pulled on the mic cable it became very intermittent. And that led to me spending a half hour trying to raise a nearby boat with radar to ask which way the storm appeared to be moving. Then the lightning started hitting the water all around me...from there...well...let's just say it went downhill some. Simple is good. Thanks again for the feedback. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TX Distance question | Antenna | |||
Stacking Distance Question. More Information | Antenna | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
Question about attenuators ... | Antenna |