Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
c schrieb:
Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... c schrieb: Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! Please be a bit creative yourself. And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... Rene |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... c schrieb: Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! Please be a bit creative yourself. And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... Rene |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rene schrieb:
That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rene schrieb:
That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!!
I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Peter Völpel wrote: Rene schrieb: That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!!
I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Peter Völpel wrote: Rene schrieb: That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Shrader wrote:
I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!! I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Right Dave, And that page failed the W3C makeup validation just from the beginning... Peter,DF3KV |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Shrader wrote:
I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!! I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Right Dave, And that page failed the W3C makeup validation just from the beginning... Peter,DF3KV |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... Rene schrieb: And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Yes. I know that. It has a nice religious feel around it, bashing Microsoft. Rene |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
6/2/70/23 vertical Diamond antennas (information). | Antenna |