Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mensch Meier,
da hat jemand mit einem Beitrag, den man einfach wegclicken konnte fasst genau soviel Beisser und Beller wachgemacht, wie Nils. Heiner, der ganz schnell in den Keller muss, da ist ne Schüppe umgefallen (Top1). |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gee! I wonder if that's because I just downloaded Netscape 7.1??
BTW: it works great! Deacon Dave, W1MCE Fluxuated wrote: Well you may want to get a new browser, Netscape Laid off about half it's people last week. "Dave Shrader" wrote in message news:gMaSa.97008$N7.12123@sccrnsc03... I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!! I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Peter Völpel wrote: Rene schrieb: That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gee! I wonder if that's because I just downloaded Netscape 7.1??
BTW: it works great! Deacon Dave, W1MCE Fluxuated wrote: Well you may want to get a new browser, Netscape Laid off about half it's people last week. "Dave Shrader" wrote in message news:gMaSa.97008$N7.12123@sccrnsc03... I have been a Netscape user for almost 8 years. I refuse to use IE!! I spent years writing HTML based web pages in HTML!! And, I always Beta tested my pages against all available browsers. The current software for designing web sites is compliant with the Bill Gates world, but, the world is bigger than Bill Gates. Deacon Dave, W1MCE Peter Völpel wrote: Rene schrieb: That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph A. Schmid, DK5RAS wrote:
"c" wrote: If a antenne does not do what it is expect to do we can claim the money back. I never would buy a diamond antenna if there are better alternatives available, and in most cases there are! Name one? Welche? Ich meine jetzt nur VHF/UHF Omnis... auf KW gibt es sicherlich Alternativen :-) 73, Ekki, DF4OR |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph A. Schmid, DK5RAS wrote:
"c" wrote: If a antenne does not do what it is expect to do we can claim the money back. I never would buy a diamond antenna if there are better alternatives available, and in most cases there are! Name one? Welche? Ich meine jetzt nur VHF/UHF Omnis... auf KW gibt es sicherlich Alternativen :-) 73, Ekki, DF4OR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
6/2/70/23 vertical Diamond antennas (information). | Antenna |