The FCC friday affirmed Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine. You can read the
article he

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/12/02/101/?nc=1

Todd N9OGL

Man that Gerritsen guy sounds like a psycho

N9OGL wrote:
The FCC friday affirmed Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine. You can read the
article he

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/12/02/101/?nc=1

This guy is an idiot and a loser, but having lived in that area I
can attest to the crapola that manifests in that area and that punks
like him are a dime-a-dozen. The infamous "W6NUT" repeater on 147.435
makes RRAP's worst day look like a Lady's Tea at Church on Sunday...

73

Steve, K4YZ

Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????

We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing
the fish!

Anon wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????

AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you!


We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters, but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are disturbing
the fish!

You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty.

Take your Lithium Woger.

Vertially challenged Boy.

ROTFLMAO!

Anon wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

You should be able to assimilate yourself quite well with the likes of
"2Test" AB8MQ and some of his brother jammers and malcontents.
Does the below look familiar, Mr. Bailey????

AB8MQ never got a fine, dumbass Davies. Unlike you!


We, at the LPWS have often been accused of being jammers, but this is far
from the truth. Admittedly, there is the playing of music on repeaters,
but
these are usually idle until one of our members comes along with a jolly
tune (see the selection for download!).
An analogy of what occurs could be the following:- You stand on a river
bridge calmly throwing stones into the water, a few anglers a mile or so
away hear this and pack up and walk down to the area of the river beneath
the bridge and set up their rods. They then complain that you are
disturbing
the fish!

You jam the Huntsville and Athens, Alabama repeaters, fatty.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
Who said anything about a fine, Roger? We know Riley didn't fine you. He
merely warned you in writing about malicious interference and mandated (not
'invited') that you retest.
Any Google search of AB8MQ will show that.

wrote:

Oh my God...... I have finally found 'The Land Of Misfit Hams'........
I think I'll pull up a chair and make myself comfy.

You poor, poor sods!

Yes...the rowdy and the reckless.

But beware the "Feeble Five."

Leonard H. "Lennie" Anderson. Allegedly an electronics "engineer"
and "radio professional". Not a licensed Amateur, but has spent almost
a decade telling Amateurs how they SHOULD be conducting their business.
Has literally spammed the FCC ECFS with multiple "reply comments" that
are nothing more than verbose personal attacks on anyone who Lennie
remotely deems as having made a good presentation of facts on issues he
holds a contrary opinion. (Search ECFS for "Leonard H. Anderson" and
see what I mean). He spent one tour in post WW2 Japan as an Army radio
mechanic and now knows all there is to know about "HF
operating"...Don't believe me? Just ask him! He's also an "expert" on
WW2 civil defense, child rearing, emergency communications, aerial
navigation, medical terminology and practice, and now real estate
zoning. Hint: He's too young to have served in CD, has no children,
is not involved in REACT, let alone any "emcomm", is not a pilot, does
not now nor ever held a medical or nursing license, and does not hold a
relators license. Lennie's list of what he "isn't" is lengthy,
considered his many profound pontifications on those "isn'ts".

Frank Gilliland. Frankie's not an Amateur either, but he was a
"amateur" Marine. Seems his only purpose in THIS forum is to try and
undermine anything I have to say or do by claiming that since he spent
one tour in the USMC himself, he "knows" all about other
Marines...However Frankie didn't make it through his one and only tour
unscathed...Seems Frankie was a discipline problem the whole time he
was in and was court martialed not once, but twice. Two court martials
in one four-year enlistment. For one who was in the Corps and knows how
many other "non-judicial" and other "local" punishments there are for
minor infractions, I am impressed as to just how big a PITA Frankie
must have been that they used court martials rather than those
alternatives. he continues his PITA conduct into his USENET life.
This is his one and only opportunity to "take a swing" at a Staff NCO
and not get a THIRD court martial in his SRB. Frankie claims to be a
close friend of LtCol Oliver North and to have "resources you don't
even begin to understand" when it comes to the Armed Forces, yet can't
seem to follow simple references to public information. Frankie's the
RRAP version of the drunk at the end of the bar at the VFW or American
Legion post.

Brian "The Brain" P. Burke, N0IMD. Brian is Lennie's puppet boy.
Lennie says "dance" and Brain is all too happy to let him pull the
strings and follow his lead. Has publically expressed "admiration" and
"support" for Lennie despite Lennie's countless documented lies and
intentionally deceitful anti-Amateur Radio rhetoric. Brain also claims
to have operated from Somalia during operation "Restore Hope" in the
90's, however can't seem to come up with a single callsign or QSL card
from anyone he "worked". In any case, he may have worked them, however
not legally. He had no authorization to do so. Brain is also known
for such trivial radio discussion "faux pas" as "unlicensed devices
play the major role in emergency comms" and "ARES won't be able to
respond to a major disaster", among other silliness. he claims to have
been in the USAF MARS program, yet can't seem to figure out how to take
my old callsign to verify my past participation...Of course anytime any
of the Feeble Five are provided some readily researchable reference to
prove what they've been told, they then demand that others "scan" a
copy of documents to "prove" it.

Todd "Toiddie" Daugherty, N9OGL. Todd is a combination of a
"Saturday Night Live" version of Howard Stern on the Amateur airways,
with just a bit of PeeWee Herman thrown in for flavor. He purports to
operate an "information bulletin" station yet refers to all of his
broadcasting as "shows", and clearly uses these to broadcast his
personal opinion and rhetoric, not "information". Almost 40, he's
living at home and sopping up all the resources he can from mumsy and
pops while they are still able to do it. Todd's biggest rants center
around (1) his inability to obtain an LPFM license for his non-existant
"company", (2) his illegal use of the Amateur service to take the place
of the LPFM license he didn't get, and now (3) his BBS sites for the
promulgation of kiddy-porn anime. I wish him well since there's a
recent news release of a guy sentenced by a FEDERAL court for
promulgating cartoon-style kiddy-porn. Of course like all
kiddy-porners, he claims it's his "Constitutional" right to promulgate
kiddy-porn.

Lastly there's Mark C."i ma not a lier" Morgan, KB9RQZ. Mark is a
very troubled, disturbed fellow with numerous anger management and
perversion issues that are unresolved. He's an admitted former mental
health patient, and frankly he needs to be a CURRENT patient. His
posts are legend for his butchering of the English language and his
stubborn refusal to use a spellchecker. He does, however, claim an IQ
of over 248. Mark also brags on his use of intentional deceit and lies
as "natural and normal" and insists that lying and deceit are traits to
be taught to children. His grandest use of this was his insistence
that he was a drafted officer (a Colonel, no less...) in the US Army
Chemical Corps, and that despite his avowed sexual perversions was not
allowed to "retire" or "resign" from his unit. The story unravels
before it really gets going because Markie would have only been 7 or 8
years old as the last Viet Nam era conscriptees were being mustered OUT
(not in). All of this in order to try and gain some "points" in this
USENET forum since he knows I am prior service enlisted USMC. He
"figured" I'd be "impressed" by a functionally illiterate draftee
officer (uhhhh...yeah...right...). Since then we've been subjected to
threads of alleged stalking, death threats, "elder abuse", etc. Markie
just completed a seven day stretch wherein he loaded the NG with just
under 400 such threads or reply threads. He is now forging e-mail
addresses in order to manufacture extra 'accounts' with which to get
around Google's posting limits and spam the NG even more. He's
presently manufacturing posts in this forum with my callsign and that
of my wife, Amy, W5AMY.

I am sure their responses to/about me will be predictable.

73 and welcome to USENET Amateur Radio Hell!

Steve, K4YZ

Todd "Toiddie" Daugherty, N9OGL. Todd is a combination of a
"Saturday Night Live" version of Howard Stern on the Amateur airways,
with just a bit of PeeWee Herman thrown in for flavor. He purports to
operate an "information bulletin" station yet refers to all of his
broadcasting as "shows", and clearly uses these to broadcast his
personal opinion and rhetoric, not "information".

Nice, coming from someone who has NEVER heard my bulletin. If you think
(which I really doubt you do) it's illegal then bitch to the FCC, if
you aren't going to complain then shut the HELL up.


Almost 40, he's living at home and sopping up all the resources he can from mumsy and
pops while they are still able to do it.

Yeah right steve, lying again

Todd's biggest rants center around (1) his inability to obtain an LPFM license for his non-existant
"company",

Steve, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM, get your fact right before
posting. As for my "company" who said it's non-exisant? you a little
nobody. RIGHT!

(2) his illegal use of the Amateur service to take the place of the LPFM license he didn't get,

Dam right, and there's NOTHING yo can do about it Bwahahaha

and now (3) his BBS sites for the promulgation of kiddy-porn anime. I wish him well since there's a recent news release of a guy sentenced by a FEDERAL court for promulgating cartoon-style kiddy-porn.

The truth steve is the guy was found guilty of possession REAL child
porn, animation porn is in fact legal (Below is the Federal Law)

SSEC. 502. IMPROVEMENTS TO PROHIBITION ON VIRTUAL CHILD
PORNOGRAPHY.
(a) Section 2256(8) of title 18, United States Code, is amended-
(1) so that subparagraph (B) reads as follows:
''(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer
image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable
from, that of a minor engaging in sexually
explicit conduct; or'';
(2) by striking ''; or'' at the end of subparagraph (C) and
inserting a period; and
(3) by striking subparagraph (D).
(b) Section 2256(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended
to read as follows:
''(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), 'sexually
explicit conduct' means actual or simulated-''(i) sexual
intercourse, including genital-genital, oralgenital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons
of the same or opposite sex;
''(ii) bestiality;
''(iii) masturbation;
''(iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
''(v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area
of any person;
''(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) of this section, 'sexually
explicit conduct' means-
[next page]
''(i) graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital,
oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether
between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious
simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast,
or pubic area of any person is exhibited;
''(ii) graphic or lascivious simulated;
''(I) bestiality;
''(II) masturbation; or
''(III) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
''(iii) graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the
genitals or pubic area of any person;''.
(c) Section 2256 is amended by inserting at the end the following
new paragraphs:
''(10) 'graphic', when used with respect to a depiction of
sexually explicit conduct, means that a viewer can observe
any part of the genitals or pubic area of any depicted person
or animal during any part of the time that the sexually explicit
conduct is being depicted; and
''(11) the term 'indistinguishable' used with respect to a
depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction
is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction
would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged
in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply
to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or
paintings depicting minors or adults.''.
(d) Section 2252A(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended
to read as follows:
''(c) It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating
paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) that-
''(1)(A) the alleged child pornography was produced using
an actual person or persons engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
and
''(B) each such person was an adult at the time the material
was produced; or''(2) the alleged child pornography was not
produced using any actual minor or minors.
No affirmative defense under subsection (c)(2) shall be available
in any prosecution that involves child pornography as described
in section 2256(8)(C). A defendant may not assert an affirmative
defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or
(5) of subsection (a) unless, within the time provided for filing
pretrial motions or at such time prior to trial as the judge may
direct, but in no event later than 10 days before the commencement
of the trial, the defendant provides the court and the United States
with notice of the intent to assert such defense and the substance
of any expert or other specialized testimony or evidence upon which
the defendant intends to rely. If the defendant fails to comply
[NEW PAGE VerDate 11-MAY-2000 21:52 May 02, 2003 Jkt 019139 PO 00021
Frm 00031 Fmt 6580 Sfmt 6581 E:\PUBLAW\PUBL021.108 APPS24 PsN: PUBL021
117 STAT. 680 PUBLIC LAW 108-21-APR. 30, 2003]
with this subsection, the court shall, absent a finding of
extraordinary
circumstances that prevented timely compliance, prohibit
the defendant from asserting such defense to a charge of violating
paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) or presenting
any evidence for which the defendant has failed to provide proper
and timely notice.''.



Of course like all kiddy-porners, he claims it's his "Constitutional" right to promulgate kiddy-porn.

Animation Porn, even lolicon is LEGAL and in 2001 the US Supreme Court
ruled that "virtual child porn" (which includes animation lolicon) WAS
protected by the First Amendment. Beside what are going to do about
it??? NOTHING, grow up steve you little worm

Todd N9OGL