Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to build a low pass filter for 1296 and have scaled a design out
of the handbook. I would like to use chip inductors and chip capacitors for the filter. I was looking at thin film chip inductors (Digi-Key) and they list the self resonant frequency. For an inductor passing 1296, what should the minimum self resonant frequency be? Is 10 GHz enough? The filter is a 5 element Chebyshev Low Pass Filter, inductive input (3 coils in series with a cap at each inner junction to ground), Fco=1290 MHz, F-20dB=2600 MHz. Any other component specs I need to be aware of? Scott N0EDV |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
I want to build a low pass filter for 1296 and have scaled a design out of the handbook. I would like to use chip inductors and chip capacitors for the filter. I was looking at thin film chip inductors (Digi-Key) and they list the self resonant frequency. For an inductor passing 1296, what should the minimum self resonant frequency be? Is 10 GHz enough? The filter is a 5 element Chebyshev Low Pass Filter, inductive input (3 coils in series with a cap at each inner junction to ground), Fco=1290 MHz, F-20dB=2600 MHz. Any other component specs I need to be aware of? Scott N0EDV 10Ghz would be *almost* an order of magnitude away from the frequency of interest. That should be more than sufficient. The higher the self-resonant frequency, the less parallel capacitance is involved which makes "trimming" the filter less involved. At this frequency your capacitors are going to be pretty small. Parasitic capacitances, such as in the inductor, can make things look pretty screwy in a big hurry. tim ab0wr |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
I want to build a low pass filter for 1296 and have scaled a design out of the handbook. I would like to use chip inductors and chip capacitors for the filter. I was looking at thin film chip inductors (Digi-Key) and they list the self resonant frequency. For an inductor passing 1296, what should the minimum self resonant frequency be? Is 10 GHz enough? The filter is a 5 element Chebyshev Low Pass Filter, inductive input (3 coils in series with a cap at each inner junction to ground), Fco=1290 MHz, F-20dB=2600 MHz. Any other component specs I need to be aware of? Scott N0EDV Inductance of the capacitors, capacitance of the inductors, and loss of both will all affect the quality of the filter. Parasitic inductances and capacitances in the connecting lines and mounting pads will play a role also. Your problem probably won't be so much getting decent response to 2600 MHz (although it won't be easy), but maintaining good attenuation for some range above that. Take a careful look at the highest frequency you have to reject and the required attenuation at that frequency, then decide whether your components will behave as expected up there. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the replies...I will probably give it a go and see what
happens. I will order values of inductors and capacitors on both sides of my calculated values and play with the circuit until (if) I can get it to work OK. Maybe an appropriate helical filter might be the way to go... Scott N0EDV Scott wrote: I want to build a low pass filter for 1296 and have scaled a design out of the handbook. I would like to use chip inductors and chip capacitors for the filter. I was looking at thin film chip inductors (Digi-Key) and they list the self resonant frequency. For an inductor passing 1296, what should the minimum self resonant frequency be? Is 10 GHz enough? The filter is a 5 element Chebyshev Low Pass Filter, inductive input (3 coils in series with a cap at each inner junction to ground), Fco=1290 MHz, F-20dB=2600 MHz. Any other component specs I need to be aware of? Scott N0EDV |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
I want to build a low pass filter for 1296 and have scaled a design out of the handbook. I would like to use chip inductors and chip capacitors for the filter. I was looking at thin film chip inductors (Digi-Key) and they list the self resonant frequency. For an inductor passing 1296, what should the minimum self resonant frequency be? Is 10 GHz enough? The filter is a 5 element Chebyshev Low Pass Filter, inductive input (3 coils in series with a cap at each inner junction to ground), Fco=1290 MHz, F-20dB=2600 MHz. Any other component specs I need to be aware of? Scott N0EDV Why not a microstrip filter? Is it that you must have response from DC all the way to 1296? Would a "no-tune" bandpass filter be more appropriate? -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott wrote: I want to build a low pass filter for 1296 and have scaled a design out of the handbook. I would like to use chip inductors and chip capacitors for the filter. I was looking at thin film chip inductors (Digi-Key) and they list the self resonant frequency. For an inductor passing 1296, what should the minimum self resonant frequency be? Is 10 GHz enough? The filter is a 5 element Chebyshev Low Pass Filter, inductive input (3 coils in series with a cap at each inner junction to ground), Fco=1290 MHz, F-20dB=2600 MHz. Any other component specs I need to be aware of? Scott N0EDV Adding to what others have already posted, you can simulate the filter, with parasitic resistances and reactances and the inevitable transmission line effects, in the freeware RFSim99. You have to be careful to think about the physical layout, and see everything longer than a couple millimeters as a transmission line. The data sheets on the discrete parts should give you a decent idea about the parasitic R/L/C of each package. RFSim99 includes the ability to model self-resonance and Q in inductors and capacitors without adding more parts to the schematic; just check the "use physical model" box for those parts you want to specify for Q and SRF. And I'd echo what Tim wrote, too: you might want to consider a distributed filter, especially if you can make a PC board with reasonable accuracy. Also, if the goal is to kill harmonics of a single narrow band, you may do better with notches at the harmonic frequencies. Cheers, Tom |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, it might, but I'm not 100% sure how to determine the lengths and
widths of the microstrips. (On my present project, I'm trying an open 1/4 wavelength 50 ohm stripline that I can trim down in length in an attempt to make that line a "short" at the 2nd harmonic.) The filter only needs to pass from about 1296 to 1300 MHz. I like the idea of a helical filter (except for the cost!) with steep skirts and since my I.F. will be 432 MHz, it will be far enough away so the image will be quite a ways removed and should be way down in level after the filter. Scott N0EDV Tim Wescott wrote: Why not a microstrip filter? Is it that you must have response from DC all the way to 1296? Would a "no-tune" bandpass filter be more appropriate? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's exactly what I'm trying on my present project at 902. I have a
50 microstrip line on the circuit board where the RF connector hooks up. I will etch it to be a 1/4 wavelength at 1802 MHz (2nd harmonic) and see how that works. If it works OK, I may try the same at 1296...I might also go with a helical filter...they work nice but can be a bit pricey! Scott N0EDV K7ITM wrote: Also, if the goal is to kill harmonics of a single narrow band, you may do better with notches at the harmonic frequencies. Cheers, Tom |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
That's exactly what I'm trying on my present project at 902. I have a 50 microstrip line on the circuit board where the RF connector hooks up. I will etch it to be a 1/4 wavelength at 1802 MHz (2nd harmonic) and see how that works. If it works OK, I may try the same at 1296...I might also go with a helical filter...they work nice but can be a bit pricey! Isn't it possible to make a helical resonator with a helix of wire inside a box made from soldered-together pieces of PC board?(*) A filter could be made from a series of these. The Q might not be optimum, but should be good enough for a lot of purposes. (*) I actually made a two-resonator filter for 450 MHz using this method long ago, but it didn't work well. I came across it recently and checked it with a network analyzer -- I had no decent test equipment back when I made it -- and found that the sections were severely undercoupled. But I haven't tried modifying it to see if it could have been made to work as intended. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, that's all a helical filter appears to be...a coil inside a metal
box. I have no idea how many turns, turn spacing and anything else that might be important to the design of one. Fortunately, Downeast Microwave sells a bunch of different helicals for a LOT less than Digikey, but I need the 1305 MHz set and I don't see them at DEMI, so I'll have to fork out $26 each from Digikey (and probably will end up using two) ;( Scott N0EDV Roy Lewallen wrote: Scott wrote: That's exactly what I'm trying on my present project at 902. I have a 50 microstrip line on the circuit board where the RF connector hooks up. I will etch it to be a 1/4 wavelength at 1802 MHz (2nd harmonic) and see how that works. If it works OK, I may try the same at 1296...I might also go with a helical filter...they work nice but can be a bit pricey! Isn't it possible to make a helical resonator with a helix of wire inside a box made from soldered-together pieces of PC board?(*) A filter could be made from a series of these. The Q might not be optimum, but should be good enough for a lot of purposes. (*) I actually made a two-resonator filter for 450 MHz using this method long ago, but it didn't work well. I came across it recently and checked it with a network analyzer -- I had no decent test equipment back when I made it -- and found that the sections were severely undercoupled. But I haven't tried modifying it to see if it could have been made to work as intended. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Klingenfuss 2005 Super Frequency List CD-ROM Question | Shortwave | |||
STARTEK 15-BG FREQUENCY COUNTER QUESTION... | Swap | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna |