Danny Richardson wrote in
:

On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:48:44 -0800, Bill Turner
wrote:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:19:07 -0800, "Caveat Lector"
wrote:

Maybe this will help(a little) to get rid of the off topic posts

For what this News Group is about and applicable guide lines see URL:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/personal-intro/

Thanks for reading
73 CL


------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Dream on, CL. These guys already know that and they don't care. It's
been that way forever. It's the Curse of Usenet.

Bill, W6WRT

After years of resisting I'm ready for a moderated antenna group. I've
used my kill filter more times in the last three months than I've ever
done in the previous ten years.

I, for one, am sick and tired of the foul-mouth off topic postings
and, if that requires a moderated group to get rid of them it would be
a very small price to pay.

Danny,


I know what you mean Dan. With the anticipation that ham radio is going
to get dumbed down again real soon, the dumb-it-downers like Lenny,
Markie, Opus and a few others are really trashing the groups with anti
code test hate. We can only hope the code requirement is retained and
increased so that they can't get on HF and mess that up too.

SC

Slow Code wrote:
Danny Richardson wrote in
:

On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:48:44 -0800, Bill Turner
wrote:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:19:07 -0800, "Caveat Lector"
wrote:

Maybe this will help(a little) to get rid of the off topic posts

For what this News Group is about and applicable guide lines see URL:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/personal-intro/

Thanks for reading
73 CL


------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Dream on, CL. These guys already know that and they don't care. It's
been that way forever. It's the Curse of Usenet.

Bill, W6WRT

After years of resisting I'm ready for a moderated antenna group. I've
used my kill filter more times in the last three months than I've ever
done in the previous ten years.

I, for one, am sick and tired of the foul-mouth off topic postings
and, if that requires a moderated group to get rid of them it would be
a very small price to pay.

Danny,


I know what you mean Dan.

No you don't. You're one of the foul-mouthed off-topic posters that
Dan is complaining about.

With the anticipation that ham radio is going
to get dumbed down again real soon, the dumb-it-downers

It got "dumbed-down" when a license was issued to you.

BTW, what is your call?

wrote in message
ps.com...

Slow Code wrote:
Danny Richardson wrote in
:

On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:48:44 -0800, Bill Turner
wrote:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:19:07 -0800, "Caveat Lector"
wrote:

Maybe this will help(a little) to get rid of the off topic posts

For what this News Group is about and applicable guide lines see URL:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/personal-intro/

Thanks for reading
73 CL


------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Dream on, CL. These guys already know that and they don't care. It's
been that way forever. It's the Curse of Usenet.

Bill, W6WRT

After years of resisting I'm ready for a moderated antenna group. I've
used my kill filter more times in the last three months than I've ever
done in the previous ten years.

I, for one, am sick and tired of the foul-mouth off topic postings
and, if that requires a moderated group to get rid of them it would be
a very small price to pay.

Danny,


I know what you mean Dan.

No you don't. You're one of the foul-mouthed off-topic posters that
Dan is complaining about.

With the anticipation that ham radio is going
to get dumbed down again real soon, the dumb-it-downers

It got "dumbed-down" when a license was issued to you.

BTW, what is your call?

What is YOUR call, Billy? Which part of Ohio do you live in? Cincinnati
maybe?

wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

I know what you mean Dan.

No you don't. You're one of the foul-mouthed off-topic posters that
Dan is complaining about.

I guess he's in good company then, Brain...There's you, Morkie,
Lennie, Frankie, and Toiddie to keep him warm!

With the anticipation that ham radio is going
to get dumbed down again real soon, the dumb-it-downers

It got "dumbed-down" when a license was issued to you.

Pot / Kettle / Black

BTW, what is your call?

What does it matter, Brain?

You don't sign YOUR call here!

You unceremoniously dropped your "billybeeper" personna for
"hot-ham-and-cheese", trying to hide your identity until your ego
overcame situational awareness and you did sign a post.

I can't help but wonder which one of the other annonnies may be you
right now...Afterall, that is your MO.

No matter...You'll do it again...You'll let your ego get ahead of
your common sense and you'll out yourself again. You always do.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote in
ps.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Danny Richardson wrote in
:

On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:48:44 -0800, Bill Turner
wrote:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:19:07 -0800, "Caveat Lector"
wrote:

Maybe this will help(a little) to get rid of the off topic posts

For what this News Group is about and applicable guide lines see
URL:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/radio/personal-intro/

Thanks for reading
73 CL


------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Dream on, CL. These guys already know that and they don't care. It's
been that way forever. It's the Curse of Usenet.

Bill, W6WRT

After years of resisting I'm ready for a moderated antenna group.
I've used my kill filter more times in the last three months than
I've ever done in the previous ten years.

I, for one, am sick and tired of the foul-mouth off topic postings
and, if that requires a moderated group to get rid of them it would
be a very small price to pay.

Danny,


I know what you mean Dan.

No you don't. You're one of the foul-mouthed off-topic posters that
Dan is complaining about.

With the anticipation that ham radio is going
to get dumbed down again real soon, the dumb-it-downers

It got "dumbed-down" when a license was issued to you.

BTW, what is your call?


Don't worry about my callsign. Just keep practicing CW. No matter how fast
and good you already are at it you can always improve your skills.

SC